quoth Kurt Wall:
| "Linux users brag about how long their systems stay up; Window
| users know it's only a temporary condition."
"Now! Viagra for Windows! Get it up, keep it up!"
also
"Now! Monica for Linux. When you *want* your computer to go down!"
--
dep
http://www.linuxandmain.com -- outs
I have the following error on boot into a new built system. iptabelw 1.2.8
invalid mask 70 specified. Any body know and tell me what I need to do to fix
this. I basicly just down loaded and installed. Any help appreciaated
cheers
--
Rick Sivernell
Dallas, Texas 75287
972 306-2296
[EMAIL
Quoth Ben Duncan:
> Hmmm .. I think we just came up with a GOOD sig:
>
> Linux users brag on how long their system stays up,
> Window users assume it's a temporary condition ...
Added to my fortune source file as:
"Linux users brag about how long their systems stay up; Window users
know it's onl
Quoth Michael Hipp:
> Bill Campbell wrote:
> In addition to job security these
> > MCSEs are afraid they might have to learn something more than the 3 Rs
> > of Microsoft, Reboot, Reboot, Reinstall.
>
> Hehe. Actually, those of us that have been around a while know it to be
> the 4 Rs:
>
> Reboo
> 5, five rules to the Spanish Inqu... uh, Microshaft.
>
> Reboot, Reboot, Reinstall, Replace (hardware), Repurchase (upgrade
> software)
Exactly I work at a riotinto company and we just got w2k installed and
then they move to XP... net result no improvement in functionality... but
it made the ma
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Michael Hipp wrote:
> Bill Campbell wrote:
> In addition to job security these
> > MCSEs are afraid they might have to learn something more than the
> 3 Rs > of Microsoft, Reboot, Reboot, Reinstall.
>
> Hehe. Actually, those of us that have been around a while know it to
> be the 4 Rs:
>
> Rebo
Bill Campbell wrote:
In addition to job security these
> MCSEs are afraid they might have to learn something more than the 3 Rs
> of Microsoft, Reboot, Reboot, Reinstall.
Hehe. Actually, those of us that have been around a while know it to be
the 4 Rs:
Reboot, Reboot, Reinstall, Replace ... with
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:52:55PM -0400, dep wrote:
>quoth Bill Campbell:
>
>| Hackers aren't the only thing that cause serious economic loss.
>| The lost productivity waiting for Windows systems to reboot, even
>| if there's no data loss, I did some rough calculations after
>| reading an articl
quoth Bill Campbell:
| Hackers aren't the only thing that cause serious economic loss.
| The lost productivity waiting for Windows systems to reboot, even
| if there's no data loss, I did some rough calculations after
| reading an article that said United Parcel Service had about
| 160,000 Windo
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
> Hackers aren't the only thing that cause serious economic loss. The lost
> productivity waiting for Windows systems to reboot, even if there's no data
> loss, I did some rough calculations after reading an article that said
> United Parcel Service had a
Bill Campbell wrote:
> I've always that the directors and officers of any public company are
> guilty of malfeasance if they entrust sensitive data to Windows. What
> would happen if bankers left the vault and doors unlocked?
No one would put money *into* that bank.
In Harmony's Way, and In A C
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:24:52PM -0400, dep wrote:
>quoth Bill Campbell:
>
>| I've always that the directors and officers of any public company
>| are guilty of malfeasance if they entrust sensitive data to
>| Windows. What would happen if bankers left the vault and doors
>| unlocked?
>
>they wo
quoth Bill Campbell:
| I've always that the directors and officers of any public company
| are guilty of malfeasance if they entrust sensitive data to
| Windows. What would happen if bankers left the vault and doors
| unlocked?
they would be held accountable, or should be -- but that should in n
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:05:57PM -0400, dep wrote:
>quoth Bill Campbell:
>
>| Aren't you targeting the wrong folks? Shouldn't you be heading
>| for my neighbor in Redmond?
>
>well, they bear some responsibility, sure, but leaving locks off the
>doors only makes the burglar's job easier -- it do
quoth Joel Hammer:
| your_details.zip
|
| Does anyone know what this email attachment is? This is a zip file
| which contains a pif file. It seems to be a windows targeted nasty.
http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/virus/story/0,10801,82512,00.html?nas=AM-82512
"The worm affects
Actually, it probably just distributes itself to a bunch of other
people. And it presumably installs a limited backdoor on the system that
someone can use for DDoS or untraceable hacking. Seems like most of the
nasty things viruses do to infected machines these days are either because
they ar
Not here. Still, the expression on some people's face when I mention that
there are no Windows machines on my network... it's priceless.
I just had a supervisor from a large firm ask me what kind of freeware existed
for flowcharting. Apparently he deems me some sort of expert on Freeware. I
expl
I agree. One positive move by the KDE team is creating their own GUI tools.
These are neither vendor- or version-specific (except of course the first
release :)
David's point is, of course, very valid. People don't want to know what
they're doing, they just want it to work (for a little while).
Quoth Chong Yu Meng:
> Same here. But I have found myself wondering, recently, what this
> particular virus does. Kind of like survivor guilt. Strange huh ?
Strange, yes. In this particular case, though, I haven't felt a
twinge of survivor guilt. More like gratitude it's someone else.
;-)
Kurt
quoth Bill Campbell:
| Aren't you targeting the wrong folks? Shouldn't you be heading
| for my neighbor in Redmond?
well, they bear some responsibility, sure, but leaving locks off the
doors only makes the burglar's job easier -- it doesn't excuse the
burglar.
--
dep
http://www.linuxandmain.
>http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6956 -- Ian Lance
Extracted:
"I asked a couple of times why SCO was being so secretive about everything.
The answers were not particularly convincing. SCO said it was keeping its
evidence secret because it is part of a legal action. The evidence wi
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 10:31:57AM -0400, dep wrote:
>quoth Kurt Wall:
>| Quoth David A. Bandel:
>|
>| > Sorry you folks have to deal with or even worry about it. They
>| > don't seem to affect any of my systems. ;-)
>|
>| Nope. Nothing here at KurtWerks seems to mind. :-)
>
>it's simply the fact
*** eSafe detected a hostile content in this email. ***
Time: 10:57:51 06/26/03
Scan result: Mail modified to remove malicious content
Protocol: SMTP in
File Name / Mail Subject: D:\Program Files\eSafe\eSafeCR\SPOOL\1055932066
Source: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Destination: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Details: your
quoth Kurt Wall:
| Quoth David A. Bandel:
|
| > Sorry you folks have to deal with or even worry about it. They
| > don't seem to affect any of my systems. ;-)
|
| Nope. Nothing here at KurtWerks seems to mind. :-)
it's simply the fact that these bozos are making the *attempt.* which
so far as i'
Same here. But I have found myself wondering, recently, what this
particular virus does. Kind of like survivor guilt. Strange huh ?
Regards,
pascal chong
Kurt Wall wrote:
Nope. Nothing here at KurtWerks seems to mind. :-)
KUrt
___
Linux-users m
Quoth David A. Bandel:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 07:45:10 -0400
> dep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > quoth Joel Hammer:
> > | your_details.zip
> > |
> > | Does anyone know what this email attachment is? This is a zip file
> > | which contains a pif file. It seems to be a windows targeted nasty.
> >
spam?
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Joel Hammer wrote:
> your_details.zip
>
> Does anyone know what this email attachment is? This is a zip file which
> contains a pif file. It seems to be a windows targeted nasty.
>
> Joel
>
> ___
> Linux-users mailing list
> [
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 07:45:10 -0400
dep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> quoth Joel Hammer:
> | your_details.zip
> |
> | Does anyone know what this email attachment is? This is a zip file
> | which contains a pif file. It seems to be a windows targeted nasty.
>
> a standard outlook rip. whole new batc
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 15:10:00 +1000 (EST)
"James McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Shawn L Johnston wrote:
> >> Has anyone used the Red Hat Workstation? Does it seem good, bad, or
> >just> a basic Red Hat product with a higher price tag?
> >
> > Yes, to the 2nd question.
quoth Joel Hammer:
| your_details.zip
|
| Does anyone know what this email attachment is? This is a zip file
| which contains a pif file. It seems to be a windows targeted nasty.
a standard outlook rip. whole new batch of 'em the last few days. i'm
fast reaching the point that i would take pleasu
Quoth Joel Hammer:
> your_details.zip
>
> Does anyone know what this email attachment is? This is a zip file which
> contains a pif file. It seems to be a windows targeted nasty.
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kurt
--
"... all the modern inconveniences
your_details.zip
Does anyone know what this email attachment is? This is a zip file which
contains a pif file. It seems to be a windows targeted nasty.
Joel
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs
33 matches
Mail list logo
