Re: glibc - what is the stable release?

2003-03-26 Thread Klaus-Peter Schrage
Net Llama! wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Collins Richey wrote: See http://www.winehq.org/news/?view=155 Too bad this is a private server: "Forbidden You don't have permission .." it was working fine yesterday. i read the article, and it was mostly Marcus Meissner debating how to fix wine horkage

Re: glibc - what is the stable release?

2003-03-26 Thread Net Llama!
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Collins Richey wrote: > On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:57:03 -0500 > Klaus-Peter Schrage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Net Llama! wrote: > > > > >>Now, Red Hat 8.0 already has 2.3.2 (-4.80) via up2date, which is a > > >big>nuisance to the wine people (and me as a wine addict): wine

Re: glibc - what is the stable release?

2003-03-25 Thread Klaus-Peter Schrage
Collins Richey wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:57:03 -0500 Klaus-Peter Schrage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Net Llama! wrote: Now, Red Hat 8.0 already has 2.3.2 (-4.80) via up2date, which is a big>nuisance to the wine people (and me as a wine addict): wine simply won't>run under glib 2.3.x, and it s

Re: glibc - what is the stable release?

2003-03-25 Thread Collins Richey
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:57:03 -0500 Klaus-Peter Schrage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Net Llama! wrote: > > >>Now, Red Hat 8.0 already has 2.3.2 (-4.80) via up2date, which is a > >big>nuisance to the wine people (and me as a wine addict): wine > >simply won't>run under glib 2.3.x, and it seems to b

Re: glibc - what is the stable release?

2003-03-25 Thread Klaus-Peter Schrage
Net Llama! wrote: Now, Red Hat 8.0 already has 2.3.2 (-4.80) via up2date, which is a big nuisance to the wine people (and me as a wine addict): wine simply won't run under glib 2.3.x, and it seems to be quite a hassle to make it run under the new glibc. do you know why it won't run? i use wine

Re: glibc - what is the stable release?

2003-03-25 Thread Net Llama!
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote: > Tim Wunder wrote: > > > > > FWIW, Red Hat Linux 9 will have 2.3.1 > > Now, Red Hat 8.0 already has 2.3.2 (-4.80) via up2date, which is a big > nuisance to the wine people (and me as a wine addict): wine simply won't > run under glib 2.3.x, and it se

Re: glibc - what is the stable release?

2003-03-25 Thread Klaus-Peter Schrage
Tim Wunder wrote: FWIW, Red Hat Linux 9 will have 2.3.1 Now, Red Hat 8.0 already has 2.3.2 (-4.80) via up2date, which is a big nuisance to the wine people (and me as a wine addict): wine simply won't run under glib 2.3.x, and it seems to be quite a hassle to make it run under the new glibc. Kla

Re: glibc - what is the stable release?

2003-03-24 Thread Ben Duncan
I second THAT !!! Downgraded to SuSe 8.0 after the system went totally down the toilet on SuSe 8.1 Same for Redhack 8.0 .. dep wrote: begin Net Llama!'s quote: | ahhh...ok, thanks. so, has anyone upgraded a box from a 2.2.x | version to a 2.3.x version and lived to tell the tale?

Re: glibc - what is the stable release?

2003-03-24 Thread dep
begin Net Llama!'s quote: | ahhh...ok, thanks. so, has anyone upgraded a box from a 2.2.x | version to a 2.3.x version and lived to tell the tale? is the | procedure for building 2.3.x the same as the one for 2.2.x? didn't suse 8.1 go to 2.3.0 or 2.3.1? whatever they went to, it broke every

Re: glibc - what is the stable release?

2003-03-24 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Bill Campbell wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 05:20:29PM -0500, Net Llama! wrote: > ... > >> AFAIK, they don't follow the same stable/unstable convention that the > >> kernel follows, so 2.3.1 is s'posed to be the latest stable release. > > > >ahhh...ok, thanks. so, has anyon

Re: glibc - what is the stable release?

2003-03-24 Thread Bill Campbell
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 05:20:29PM -0500, Net Llama! wrote: ... >> AFAIK, they don't follow the same stable/unstable convention that the >> kernel follows, so 2.3.1 is s'posed to be the latest stable release. > >ahhh...ok, thanks. so, has anyone upgraded a box from a 2.2.x version to >a 2.3.x vers

Re: glibc - what is the stable release?

2003-03-24 Thread Net Llama!
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Tim Wunder wrote: > On 3/24/2003 4:48 PM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote: > > I'm trying to figure out what the latest stable release of glibc is. I > > see a 2.2.5 and i see a 2.3.1. According to the (g)libc website: > > http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/ > > > > 2.3

Re: glibc - what is the stable release?

2003-03-24 Thread Tim Wunder
On 3/24/2003 4:48 PM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote: I'm trying to figure out what the latest stable release of glibc is. I see a 2.2.5 and i see a 2.3.1. According to the (g)libc website: http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/ 2.3.1 is the latest release, but they neglect to comment on whet

glibc - what is the stable release?

2003-03-24 Thread Net Llama!
I'm trying to figure out what the latest stable release of glibc is. I see a 2.2.5 and i see a 2.3.1. According to the (g)libc website: http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/ 2.3.1 is the latest release, but they neglect to comment on whether its considered to be a devel or stable release. anyone kn