On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 08:46:44 -0500
"Bill Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> using apache a proxy to "masquerade" you internal boxes..? I know
> ipchains are a thing of the past. but there is a very good reliable
> firewall/masquerade program call PMFirewall. I have used it for a long
> time with
r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:14 AM
Subject: Re: httpd proxy
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:57:47 +0800
> "m.w.chang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am using squid... havne't checked out the apac
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:57:47 +0800
"m.w.chang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using squid... havne't checked out the apache possibility. thanks
> for the info. still quite afraid to compile apaache + mods...
It doesn't bite.
--
++===
I am using squid... havne't checked out the apache possibility. thanks
for the info. still quite afraid to compile apaache + mods...
>>you meant squid? ignore me if it was not.
>
> No. I currently use Apache as a proxy. Always have. Works nice. It is only
> a proxy for internal boxes accessing t
gnored.
>
> Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
> > I always used to use Apache as an httpd proxy. However, what experience
> > has anyone had with alternatives? Good bad things. Gottchas.
>
> --
> Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust.
>
you meant squid? ignore me if it was not.
Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
> I always used to use Apache as an httpd proxy. However, what experience
> has anyone had with alternatives? Good bad things. Gottchas.
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we
I always used to use Apache as an httpd proxy. However, what experience
has anyone had with alternatives? Good bad things. Gottchas.
I know about squid, but I am not really looking for an intelligent cache.
Just a proxy. It should handle ftp and https as well.
Any suggestions
