Re: [LinuxBIOS] different versions of the GA-M57SLI-S4 (PLCC vs SPI)

On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 09:17:14PM +0200, todthgie wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Peter Stuge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 19:55 > > > The only signal we can work with is CS# > > how about #HOLD ? It's not good enough on it's own. Check out

[LinuxBIOS] http://linuxbios.eu/

I don't know if I am supposed to mention this, but time is running short for those of you who might need to make plans. If you can hold these dates open, I will try to find out if it is on or not. Also, there will likely be a linuxbios symposium in denver, CO, USA, next april. ron -- linuxbios

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [RFC] ADLO2

Hi, Do you think this new version of ADLO is able of booting Windows XP the way it is? Should I add my modifications to it ? (xpboot.diff) On 9/5/07, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > can someone with an XP license try to recreate Alex's fine work? The > more people we get to try this,

Re: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBIOS - Booting Windows XP

Hi Myles, in the xpboot.diff the following alterations should be made: In the file: util/ADLO/loader.s comment out or remove the lines 177 until 180: ;mov al, #0x3d ;; cmos_reg ;out 0x70, al ;mov al, #0x02 ;; val (hdd) ;out 0x71, al In the file: util/ADLO/bochs/bios/rombios.c uncomment l

[LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] v3: Add support for building on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD

See patch. The hostname/dnsdomainname stuff might need to be reworked a bit, I'll post another patch for that later... Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org Add support for building LinuxBIOSv3 o

Re: [LinuxBIOS] PATCH: add the pcengines ALIX1

Hi, the vendor requested ALIX1 but I will go back and ask. Sorry for the screwup on the name. As for "what works", I tried to make the Config.lb match "what works" thanks, I will repost the patch. ron -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/l

Re: [LinuxBIOS] PATCH: add the pcengines ALIX1

On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 12:58:44PM -0700, ron minnich wrote: > This is the initial config for the ALIX1 > Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nice, but needs some fixing I think: $ ./buildtarget pcengines/ALIX1 build_dir=pcengines/ALIX1/ALIX1 No linuxbios config script found. Reb

[LinuxBIOS] Another SPI Programmer

We're still working on the PLAICE but I came across this if someone wants to try it. It's an inexpensive in-circuit PC Parallel Port SPI Flash Programmer design. It could be used along with the clip-on adapters we are going to use for the PLAICE http://flash-plaice.wikispaces.com/ Simple PC Pa

[LinuxBIOS] PATCH: add the pcengines ALIX1

Attached: ron welcome PC Engines! This is the initial config for the ALIX1 Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: src/mainboard/pcengines/ALIX1/Config.lb === --- src/mainboard/pcengines/ALIX1/Config.lb (revision

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Status of the via vt82c686 southbridge?

im working on a board with this one ... here it is also the supreio ! my findings: - early_serial works - early_smbus is missing (i added it here and what i added works ... i will post patches soon) - ide is also missing im adding this right now - i could not test the rest yet - Origina

Re: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBIOS - Booting Windows XP

> http://www.linuxbios.org/Booting_Windows_using_LinuxBIOS > Feel free to test it and give some feedback!! I can get it to find my CD-ROM drive, but it fails with code: 0003. According to http://bochs.sourceforge.net/doc/docbook/user/bios-tips.html that means: For this error, the cdrom suppor

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r2758 - in trunk: LinuxBIOSv2/util util

On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 08:36:59PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > This commit removed probe_superio from v2. It has not been referenced as > svn:externals, so none of the v2 and v3 trees have probe_superio or > superiotool. Yes, and that was by design. I don't think we _really_ need them i

Re: [LinuxBIOS] different versions of the GA-M57SLI-S4 (PLCC vs SPI)

how about #HOLD ? - Original Message - From: "Peter Stuge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 19:55 Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] different versions of the GA-M57SLI-S4 (PLCC vs SPI) > On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 03:20:08PM +0200, ST wrote: >> > > Is the modification no

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r2758 - in trunk: LinuxBIOSv2/util util

Hi, On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 21:01 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 02:37:56AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > > > Wrote LinuxBIOS table at: 0x0500 - 0x0a54 checksum 401f > > > Show all devs... > > > cpus: Unknown device path type: 0 > > > Stage2 code done. > > > LA

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r2758 - in trunk: LinuxBIOSv2/util util

On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 02:37:56AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > > Wrote LinuxBIOS table at: 0x0500 - 0x0a54 checksum 401f > > Show all devs... > > cpus: Unknown device path type: 0 > > Stage2 code done. > > LAR: Attempting to open 'normal/payload'. > > LAR: Attempting to open 'no

Re: [LinuxBIOS] M57SLI Revision 2 SPI

Hmmm.. When you took contact with Gigabyte, did you clearly told them that you have a SPI revision of their board? For my part, I desoldered the SPI flash chip on my board and took a look at it with a powerfull glass and found that, in fact, they use a MX25L4005A chip from MXC. But that doesn't

[LinuxBIOS] r2763 build service

Dear LinuxBIOS readers! This is the automated build check service of LinuxBIOS. The developer "uwe" checked in revision 2763 to the LinuxBIOS source repository and caused the following changes: Change Log: Get superiotool via svn:externals into v2. Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [LinuxBIOS] NVidia southbridge question

On 9/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > Just some little newbee questions: > * What is the "romstrap" section? Does it have to be located @ a fixed > physical > address? > * What is a "SIP table"? you need to access Nvidia NDA info about that... YH -- linuxbios ma

Re: [LinuxBIOS] quadcore opteron

On 9/7/07, Fridel Fainshtein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Does quad core opteron needs some special software? > If yes, is there any supporting open source code? > (May be just first steps, cache as ram etc.) before I was leaving AMD, 1. the code works well in simulator even with 64node...

[LinuxBIOS] Status of the via vt82c686 southbridge?

What is the current status of the via vt82c686 southbridge? -Adam -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

[LinuxBIOS] r495 - LinuxBIOSv3/util

Author: uwe Date: 2007-09-07 19:53:47 +0200 (Fri, 07 Sep 2007) New Revision: 495 Modified: LinuxBIOSv3/util/ Log: Get superiotool via svn:externals into v3. Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Property changes on: LinuxBIOSv3/util __

[LinuxBIOS] r2763 - trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/util

Author: uwe Date: 2007-09-07 19:52:37 +0200 (Fri, 07 Sep 2007) New Revision: 2763 Modified: trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/util/ Log: Get superiotool via svn:externals into v2. Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Property changes on: trunk/LinuxBIOSv

[LinuxBIOS] M57SLI Revision 2 SPI

Gigabyte have told me that the BIOS chip is made by SST, and the model name is SST25LF040A BIOS ROM which is PLCC32 type. The data sheet and details are at http://www.sst.com/products.xhtml/serial_flash/25/SST25LF040A I am now very confused because I have PLCC32 sockets and these are nothing

Re: [LinuxBIOS] bcc and ADLO

> Where can I get the bcc that's required to compile ADLO? In a package called dev86. -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

[LinuxBIOS] quadcore opteron

Hi, Does quad core opteron needs some special software? If yes, is there any supporting open source code? (May be just first steps, cache as ram etc.) Thanks -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Re: [LinuxBIOS] bcc and ADLO

Where can I get the bcc that's required to compile ADLO? I just used your images, but if I need to change something then bcc will come in handy. Thanks, Myles -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [RFC] ADLO2

> Hi, > > > > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 21:23 -0700, ron minnich wrote: > > > > can someone with an XP license try to recreate Alex's fine work? The > > > > more people we get to try this, the better! > > > > I'm interested in trying this on my machine, but I have a couple of > > questions for you.

[LinuxBIOS] NVidia southbridge question

Hi all, Just some little newbee questions: * What is the "romstrap" section? Does it have to be located @ a fixed physical address? * What is a "SIP table"? thanks in advance for your answers, Florentin -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinf

Re: [LinuxBIOS] different versions of the GA-M57SLI-S4 (PLCC vs SPI)

Quoting ST <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > But well i don't have a new board and i don't know SPI stuff. But you should > try to measure all the pins i used for my stuff. Probably there is a > connection... or the CS# of both SPI chips is connected to different pins of > the SuperIO? No, the second SPI CS

Re: [LinuxBIOS] different versions of the GA-M57SLI-S4 (PLCC vs SPI)

Hi > > Mh, i don't know anything about SPI, but i think if they also have > > #init pins it should work. > They don't. Not good. If i remember correctly on my v1.0 M57SLI-S4 there have been SPI pins within the PLCC connectors. These pins where not connected to any of the open presumably SPI pins

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] pci_rom.c checksum extension rom

Hi, On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 04:29 +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > * Alex Beregszaszi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070904 13:17]: > > Hi, > > > > the attached patch adds code to checksum the pci extension rom and stop > > if the stored and calculated checksum differ. > > Is this checksum reliably correct?