Jordan Crouse wrote:
> On 16/11/07 14:58 -0800, Steve Isaacs wrote:
> > Jordan Crouse wrote:
> >> Well, first and foremost, because the tiny kernel already knows how to
> >> do
> >
> > I'm sorry, can someone enlighten me as to what a "tiny kernel" is? Is
> > that anything similar to this? http://ww
http://www.vibelights.com/elwirebyfoot.html
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
modify linuxbios early setup to route all memory requests from socket
0 to socket 1. Bypass (i.e. skip) memory setup code.
I don't think it's too hard.
intriguing project. Where are you from?
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/lin
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 01:27:12AM +0200, Fridel Fainshtein wrote:
> VxWorks "bootrom" is an example of such a tiny-kernel as well as I understand.
>
> But in my case LAB's solution is the only way. So, debug is the only
> way in the nearest future.
>
> ... and then the tiny-kernel
Look at build
VxWorks "bootrom" is an example of such a tiny-kernel as well as I understand.
But in my case LAB's solution is the only way. So, debug is the only
way in the nearest future.
... and then the tiny-kernel
And whether the linuxbios would have AMD K10 support the world would
be perfect and smiling
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
meta-comment: let's leave phase 1 in for now. I am not convinced we
will never need it. yet.
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On 16/11/07 14:58 -0800, Steve Isaacs wrote:
> Jordan Crouse wrote:
>> Well, first and foremost, because the tiny kernel already knows how to do
>
> I'm sorry, can someone enlighten me as to what a "tiny kernel" is? Is that
> anything similar to this? http://www.selenic.com/linux-tiny/
Well, typi
Jordan Crouse wrote:
> Well, first and foremost, because the tiny kernel already knows how to do
I'm sorry, can someone enlighten me as to what a "tiny kernel" is? Is
that anything similar to this? http://www.selenic.com/linux-tiny/
Steve
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http:
Corey, your responses to these answers are good and I wonder if they
might go as comments in the code.
In general, if a register setting is so confidential we can't talk
about it, we could just
tag the block with
/* NDA required */
/* Done NDA required */
or some such couldn't we?
On Nov 16, 200
On 17/11/07 00:09 +0200, Fridel Fainshtein wrote:
> Usb boot loader would be just a nice feature to have in an existent
> application.
>
> Why should one use "tiny kernel + kexec", if there are such a wonderful things
> like linuxbios and filo?
Well, first and foremost, because the tiny kernel a
Usb boot loader would be just a nice feature to have in an existent application.
Why should one use "tiny kernel + kexec", if there are such a wonderful things
like linuxbios and filo?
On Nov 16, 2007 8:07 PM, yhlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 16, 2007 4:42 AM, Fridel Fainshtein <[EMAIL PR
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:11:27PM -0700, Myles Watson wrote:
> > If I disable CONFIG_COMPRESSED_PAYLOAD_LZMA and
> > CONFIG_PRECOMPRESSED_PAYLOAD
> > in Config.lb and disable the LZMA compression in buildrom's kconfig the
> > Etherboot payload works just fine.
>
> I just tried it with serengeti_c
>> THOSE adapters only reroute some signals. they leave the vcore
>> generation completely untouched and you can easily burn your board's
>> regulators.
>
> How? I thought FC-PGA2's have a lower voltage requirment than FC-PGA's.
yes, lower voltage but HIGHER current. the problem is that the mosfe
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:43:49AM -0700, Myles Watson wrote:
>
>
> > This needs to be added on top of your big patch to make the m57sli-s4
> > build:
> >
> > --- config/platforms/m57sli.conf-orig 2007-11-22 11:11:08.0 -
> > 0500
> > +++ config/platforms/m57sli.conf2007-11-22 1
I'm a student researching digital forensics and acquisition of memory using
hardware. I had a few ideas I'm hoping is ok that I run by everyone here.
I have Tyan s2891 motherboard with one dual core Opteron and an fpga in the
second cpu socket. I would like to research two things that I would l
Well...yes there is a reason the GA-M57SLI doesn't really work for me. To
see why take a look at Ward's tutorial at
http://linuxbios.org/GIGABYTE_GA-M57SLI-S4_Build_Tutorial
The obstacles are obvious from the tutorial.
If somebody could make these modifications and ship me a working board, I
c
On Nov 16, 2007 4:42 AM, Fridel Fainshtein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Etherboot does not work with gcc 4. At least filo part.
> As I remember, I found a few strange things like
> #if 0 <-- original
> #define isdigit(c) ((c & 0x04) != 0)
> #define islower(c) ((c & 0x02) != 0)
> //#define
> This needs to be added on top of your big patch to make the m57sli-s4
> build:
>
> --- config/platforms/m57sli.conf-orig 2007-11-22 11:11:08.0 -
> 0500
> +++ config/platforms/m57sli.conf2007-11-22 10:55:47.0 -
> 0500
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_TARGET_64BIT)
This needs to be added on top of your big patch to make the m57sli-s4 build:
--- config/platforms/m57sli.conf-orig 2007-11-22 11:11:08.0 -0500
+++ config/platforms/m57sli.conf2007-11-22 10:55:47.0 -0500
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
ifeq ($(CONFIG_TARGET_64BIT),y)
$(error You must
Quoting popkonserve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I beg to differ Holger, I have bought these on ebay cheap, and they work
>> just fine on boards that support them.
>>
>> http://cgi.ebay.com/New-370-CPU-Celeron-3-Converter-Socket-for-Tualatin_W0QQitemZ230192200737QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item230192200737
>>
Etherboot does not work with gcc 4. At least filo part.
As I remember, I found a few strange things like
#if 0 <-- original
#define isdigit(c) ((c & 0x04) != 0)
#define islower(c) ((c & 0x02) != 0)
//#define isspace(c)((c & 0x20) != 0)
#define isupper(c) ((c & 0x01) != 0)
#else <
Author: hailfinger
Date: 2007-11-16 12:17:57 +0100 (Fri, 16 Nov 2007)
New Revision: 510
Modified:
LinuxBIOSv3/arch/x86/stage1.c
LinuxBIOSv3/lib/stage2.c
LinuxBIOSv3/mainboard/adl/msm800sev/stage1.c
LinuxBIOSv3/mainboard/emulation/qemu-x86/stage1.c
Log:
Improve printk documentation to m
* yhlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071116 06:31]:
> On Nov 15, 2007 7:38 AM, Corey Osgood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Fridel Fainshtein wrote:
> > > I compared to etherboot and it works there.
> > > In Etherboot there are 2 set of bswap functions:
> > > 1) little
> > > 2) big
> > >
> so any reason for
On 16.11.2007 01:17, Peter Stuge wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 06:13:41PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>
>> Improve printk documentation to match code realities.
>>
>
> Nak, for some hunks.
>
> At some point I hope that LB printk will end up in the kernel message
> buffer. Then,
Cleanup printk usage and documentation.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
--- LinuxBIOSv3/device/device.c 2007-11-15 17:50:20.0 +0100
+++ LinuxBIOSv3/device/device.c 2007-11-15 20:41:32.0 +0100
@@ -692,14 +692,14 @@
*
* Starting at the first device
Update the design doc to match a mixture of wishful thinking and reality.
* We use LAR and not CPIO
* printk() can be called from stage 1 without ill effects
* stage 2 phase 1 is without purpose
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Index: LinuxBIOSv3/doc/design/newboot.ly
> I beg to differ Holger, I have bought these on ebay cheap, and they work
> just fine on boards that support them.
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/New-370-CPU-Celeron-3-Converter-Socket-for-Tualatin_W0QQitemZ230192200737QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item230192200737
>
>
>
> Here is one for 15$
THOSE adapters
* Fridel Fainshtein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071114 20:03]:
> Hello all,
>
> It seams that the USB code was taken from the previous version of FILO
> but never have been tested.
>
> Some symptoms are
> 1)
> malloc_diag: alloc: 4208 bytes (8 blocks), free: 61320 bytes (1 blocks)
> malloc_check: sizes
28 matches
Mail list logo
