On 04.12.2007 19:40, Corey Osgood wrote:
> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>
>> Absolute calls from initram were only working from the file which had
>> _MAINOBJECT #defined. Calls from all other files ended up in nirvana
>> because the compiler was not able to calculate the address of the
>> wrap
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Absolute calls from initram were only working from the file which had
> _MAINOBJECT #defined. Calls from all other files ended up in nirvana
> because the compiler was not able to calculate the address of the
> wrapper for the absolute call. The linker tried, but fai
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Absolute calls from initram were only working from the file which had
> _MAINOBJECT #defined. Calls from all other files ended up in nirvana
> because the compiler was not able to calculate the address of the
> wrapper for the absolute call. The linker tried, but fai
On 04.12.2007 04:03, Peter Stuge wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 03:39:58AM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>
>> -ret = execute_in_place(&archive, "normal/initram.o/segment0");
>> +ret = execute_in_place(&archive, "normal/initram/segment0");
>>
>
> This seems t
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 03:39:58AM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> - ret = execute_in_place(&archive, "normal/initram.o/segment0");
> + ret = execute_in_place(&archive, "normal/initram/segment0");
This seems to have snuck in from another patch?
//Peter
--
linuxbi
Absolute calls from initram were only working from the file which had
_MAINOBJECT #defined. Calls from all other files ended up in nirvana
because the compiler was not able to calculate the address of the
wrapper for the absolute call. The linker tried, but failed miserably.
Use the -combine flag a
