On 04.06.2007 07:01, Corey Osgood wrote:
> Corey Osgood wrote:
>
>> Yeah, working on that right now. Anyone know who svn user magnanisj is?
>> I think this person worked for Linux Networx or SuSE in late 2005, but I
>> could be wrong. If they can't be identified, I've got to rewrite a
>> couple
Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> Corey Osgood wrote:
>
>> The attached patch is a unified version of the current ports of the
>> i82801 series currently in LinuxBIOS. Since most of the ports are nearly
>> identical, I've taken for each file and chosen the cleanest or best
>> version of the code, then ch
Corey Osgood wrote:
> The attached patch is a unified version of the current ports of the
> i82801 series currently in LinuxBIOS. Since most of the ports are nearly
> identical, I've taken for each file and chosen the cleanest or best
> version of the code, then checked over the datasheets to *some
* Joseph Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070604 11:57]:
> > The header in acpi_tables.c says the port was done by Digital Design
> > Corporation, does that ring any bells for anyone? If not, I'll see if
> > they can dig up anything, it's the best lead I've come up with so far.
> >
> > -Corey
> >
> >
> I
Quoting Corey Osgood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Corey Osgood wrote:
>> Yeah, working on that right now. Anyone know who svn user magnanisj is?
>> I think this person worked for Linux Networx or SuSE in late 2005, but I
>> could be wrong. If they can't be identified, I've got to rewrite a
>> couple fil
Corey Osgood wrote:
> Yeah, working on that right now. Anyone know who svn user magnanisj is?
> I think this person worked for Linux Networx or SuSE in late 2005, but I
> could be wrong. If they can't be identified, I've got to rewrite a
> couple files.
Hmm, browsing trac a little more seems that
Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:34:26AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Looks great Corey! How soon can this be Acked??
>
> Pretty soon, I guess. I'm looking over it, but we need to be careful to
> not break any existing boards.
No boards will be broken, I don't intend to remo
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:34:26AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Looks great Corey! How soon can this be Acked??
Pretty soon, I guess. I'm looking over it, but we need to be careful to
not break any existing boards. Also, at the very minimum the proper
license headers have to be added/merged.
Quoting Corey Osgood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The attached patch is a unified version of the current ports of the
> i82801 series currently in LinuxBIOS. Since most of the ports are nearly
> identical, I've taken for each file and chosen the cleanest or best
> version of the code, then checked over
Corey Osgood wrote:
> Testing on other chips can be done at this point as well, this is tested
> and working on one model, the i82801aa.
Whoops, forgot to mention, usage is pretty straightforward. In your
mainboard's Options.lb, add
uses I82801_MODEL
uses I82801
default I82810_MODEL = I82801
th
The attached patch is a unified version of the current ports of the
i82801 series currently in LinuxBIOS. Since most of the ports are nearly
identical, I've taken for each file and chosen the cleanest or best
version of the code, then checked over the datasheets to *some* of the
series, including t
11 matches
Mail list logo
