Re: [LinuxBIOS] ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe

2007-09-12 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* yhlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070911 19:57]: > about uinitid setting when c51+mcp51 or c51+mcp55... > maybe Ed is on the receiver list too.. > > or Marc could send you the diff, becase he got my latest tree... This seems to be it: http://linuxbios.org/pipermail/linuxbios/2007-January/018045.html

Re: [LinuxBIOS] ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe

2007-09-11 Thread yhlu
On 9/11/07, Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yhlu wrote: > > some months ago, i sent out about one patch about it, but wonder if it > > is checked in...you may dig out from list. > > > > or let me find some time to compare the my local tree with public tree. > > > > YH > > > > > What wa

Re: [LinuxBIOS] ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe

2007-09-11 Thread Stefan Reinauer
yhlu wrote: > some months ago, i sent out about one patch about it, but wonder if it > is checked in...you may dig out from list. > > or let me find some time to compare the my local tree with public tree. > > YH > > What was the patch about? I can try to find and merge it... Stefan -- coresy

Re: [LinuxBIOS] ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe

2007-09-11 Thread yhlu
some months ago, i sent out about one patch about it, but wonder if it is checked in...you may dig out from list. or let me find some time to compare the my local tree with public tree. YH -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Re: [LinuxBIOS] ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe

2007-09-11 Thread Marc Jones
Stefan Reinauer wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on the Asus M2N32-SLI Deluxe and I started out with the > Gigabyte target as base. > > I had to disable ht optimization in the CAR code, or the machine would > not survive the reset. > > It gets to device enumeration now, but it seems it keeps loop

[LinuxBIOS] ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe

2007-09-11 Thread Stefan Reinauer
Hi, I am working on the Asus M2N32-SLI Deluxe and I started out with the Gigabyte target as base. I had to disable ht optimization in the CAR code, or the machine would not survive the reset. It gets to device enumeration now, but it seems it keeps looping on the devices on bus 0 until it runs o