On 07/11/07 01:54 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 05:19:31PM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > > I would like any BIOS compatibility to be opt-in, and to be
> > > uninteresting because of new shinyness offered by LB and
> > > understood by all. :)
> >
> > Except of course, the e8
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 05:19:31PM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > I would like any BIOS compatibility to be opt-in, and to be
> > uninteresting because of new shinyness offered by LB and
> > understood by all. :)
>
> Except of course, the e820 table parser in the kernel... :)
Not neccessarily. O
On 07/11/07 01:12 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 12:55:25AM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> > bios compatibility
>
> I would like any BIOS compatibility to be opt-in, and to be
> uninteresting because of new shinyness offered by LB and
> understood by all. :)
Except of course
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 12:55:25AM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> bios compatibility
I would like any BIOS compatibility to be opt-in, and to be
uninteresting because of new shinyness offered by LB and
understood by all. :)
//Peter
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.
