Re: [LinuxBIOS] CONFIG_ROM_STREAM verus CONFIG_IDE_STREAM verus CONFIG_FS_STREAM?

2007-12-07 Thread Steve Isaacs
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:11 +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 10:59:21AM -0800, Steve Isaacs wrote: > > > > I found these in mainboard/momentum/apache and am wondering if I can use > > them as is for my board. > > Where is this from? There's no such board in LinuxBIOS, AFAICS. >

Re: [LinuxBIOS] CONFIG_ROM_STREAM verus CONFIG_IDE_STREAM verus CONFIG_FS_STREAM?

2007-12-07 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 10:59:21AM -0800, Steve Isaacs wrote: > I'm puzzled about the difference between these options. If I want to > boot using an IDE device does the following make sense? > > ## Boot linux from IDE > default CONFIG_IDE=1 > default CONFIG_FS_STREAM=1 > default CONFIG_FS_EXT2=1 >

Re: [LinuxBIOS] CONFIG_ROM_STREAM verus CONFIG_IDE_STREAM verus CONFIG_FS_STREAM?

2007-12-04 Thread Corey Osgood
Steve Isaacs wrote: > I'm puzzled about the difference between these options. If I want to > boot using an IDE device does the following make sense? > > ## Boot linux from IDE > default CONFIG_IDE=1 > default CONFIG_FS_STREAM=1 > default CONFIG_FS_EXT2=1 > default CONFIG_FS_ISO9660=1 > default CONF

[LinuxBIOS] CONFIG_ROM_STREAM verus CONFIG_IDE_STREAM verus CONFIG_FS_STREAM?

2007-12-04 Thread Steve Isaacs
I'm puzzled about the difference between these options. If I want to boot using an IDE device does the following make sense? ## Boot linux from IDE default CONFIG_IDE=1 default CONFIG_FS_STREAM=1 default CONFIG_FS_EXT2=1 default CONFIG_FS_ISO9660=1 default CONFIG_FS_FAT=1 default AUTOBOOT_CMDLINE=