On 08/01/08 14:20 -0700, Myles Watson wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Myles Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I went ahead and comitted this (v90), so that Ward could refactor his
patch against it.
Jordan
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbio
On 08/01/08 14:20 -0700, Myles Watson wrote:
> This patch is Jordan's buildrom patch with a few additions, so I'm including
> his original message:
>
> [BUILDROM] Expand linuxbiosv3 support
>
> Add more generic support for LinuxBIOSv3 - add specialized package
> for v3, and add support for using
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myles
> Watson
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 2:21 PM
> To: Jordan Crouse; Linuxbios
> Subject: Re: Expand linuxbiosv3 support
>
> This patch is Jordan's buildrom patch with a few additions, so I'm
>
On Dec 11, 2007 8:06 AM, Jordan Crouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is a very closed minded attitude. You may not see a reason for
> mkelfimage, but it still remains the only way to functionally boot a
> kernel under v2. When v3 has many more hours behind it and we can forget
> all about v2
On 10/12/07 21:22 -0800, ron minnich wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007 8:54 AM, Myles Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > further question, could we get rid of mkelfimage? I can't see why
> > > we're still using it.
> >
> > mkelfimage combines the kernel and the init.rd so it an be loaded by kexec.
>
>
On Dec 10, 2007 8:54 AM, Myles Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > further question, could we get rid of mkelfimage? I can't see why
> > we're still using it.
>
> mkelfimage combines the kernel and the init.rd so it an be loaded by kexec.
we have initramfs now. initrd is so 20th century :-)
and
On 10/12/07 13:52 -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
> Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > On 07/12/07 22:51 -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
> >
> >> Jordan Crouse wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> HOST_CC=gcc
> >>> -HOST_CFLAGS=
> >>> +HOST_CFLAGS=$(STACKPROTECT)
> >>>
> >
> >
> >> Okay, there's reason that I'
Jordan Crouse wrote:
> On 07/12/07 00:06 -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
>
>> Typo! That makes 2 mistakes this week! Are you feeling okay? :P
>> This does look pretty good though, and the idea of having v3 in buildrom
>> is great! I'm kicking myself now for never having used buildrom until
>> yester
Jordan Crouse wrote:
> On 07/12/07 22:51 -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
>
>> Jordan Crouse wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> HOST_CC=gcc
>>> -HOST_CFLAGS=
>>> +HOST_CFLAGS=$(STACKPROTECT)
>>>
>
>
>> Okay, there's reason that I've left just this part of the patch. With
>> the patch this way, mkelfi
On 07/12/07 22:51 -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
> Jordan Crouse wrote:
> >
> > HOST_CC=gcc
> > -HOST_CFLAGS=
> > +HOST_CFLAGS=$(STACKPROTECT)
> Okay, there's reason that I've left just this part of the patch. With
> the patch this way, mkelfimage builds (awesome, thanks!), but lzma fails:
>
> mak
> further question, could we get rid of mkelfimage? I can't see why
> we're still using it.
mkelfimage combines the kernel and the init.rd so it an be loaded by kexec.
Myles
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On 09/12/07 10:16 -0800, ron minnich wrote:
> further question, could we get rid of mkelfimage? I can't see why
> we're still using it.
Are you serious? What other options do we have for turning kernel images
into ELF images for payloads?
Jordan
--
Jordan Crouse
Systems Software Development En
further question, could we get rid of mkelfimage? I can't see why
we're still using it.
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
To work around the -fno-stack-protector problem, which mkelfimage
isn't smart enough to handle on it's own
On 12/9/07, Peter Stuge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 10:51:30PM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
> > > -HOST_CFLAGS=
> > > +HOST_CFLAGS=$(STACKPROTECT)
> >
> > With quotes a
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 10:51:30PM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
> > -HOST_CFLAGS=
> > +HOST_CFLAGS=$(STACKPROTECT)
>
> With quotes around $(STACKPROTECT), lzma finishes, but mkelfimage
> fails:
Why is mkelfImage called wtih $HOST_CFLAGS or any other CFLAGS?
//Peter
--
linuxbios mailing list
lin
Okay, its time to start re-thinking how we do -fno-stack-protector, its
obvious we are constantly robbing Peter to pay Paul.
I'll look at this on Monday.
On 07/12/07 22:51 -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
> Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > On 07/12/07 00:06 -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
> >
> >> Typo! That mak
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:31:37PM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> On 07/12/07 00:06 -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
> > Typo! That makes 2 mistakes this week! Are you feeling okay? :P
> > This does look pretty good though, and the idea of having v3 in buildrom
> > is great! I'm kicking myself now for ne
Jordan Crouse wrote:
> On 07/12/07 00:06 -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
>
>> Typo! That makes 2 mistakes this week! Are you feeling okay? :P
>> This does look pretty good though, and the idea of having v3 in buildrom
>> is great! I'm kicking myself now for never having used buildrom until
>> yester
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:31:37PM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> On 07/12/07 00:06 -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
> > Typo! That makes 2 mistakes this week! Are you feeling okay? :P
> > This does look pretty good though, and the idea of having v3 in buildrom
> > is great! I'm kicking myself now for ne
On 07/12/07 00:06 -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
> Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > This is my code to expand on what Myles has already done for v3 -
> > basically, we move to using a V3 only .mk for LinuxBIOS, and take
> > advantage of LAR to clean up the build considerably. Also, introduce
> > my new idea
On 07/12/07 07:40 -0700, Myles Watson wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jordan Crouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 4:47 PM
> > To: Myles Watson
> > Cc: linuxbios@linuxbios.org
> > Subject: Re: Expand linuxbiosv3 support
> >
> > On 06/12/07 16:
> -Original Message-
> From: Jordan Crouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 4:47 PM
> To: Myles Watson
> Cc: linuxbios@linuxbios.org
> Subject: Re: Expand linuxbiosv3 support
>
> On 06/12/07 16:32 -0700, Myles Watson wrote:
> > It complains that the logs dire
On 06/12/07 16:32 -0700, Myles Watson wrote:
> It complains that the logs directory doesn't exist when it tries to fetch
> and create the linuxbiosv3/logs/fetch.log file.
oops - my bad - I can fix that.
> I prefer to have LinuxBIOSv2 and LinuxBIOSv3 represented in the same way. I
> think it's co
23 matches
Mail list logo
