On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:58:37AM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> > > There is no copy in v3?
> >
> > Not yet. Shall we add it?
>
> Yes, please.
>
> Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Done, r444.
Uwe.
--
http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de
http://www.crazy
* Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070705 09:36]:
> > > > I personally don't think there should be a place in the v3 tree for a
> > > > utility like this, as it leads an almost completely independent life.
> > >
> > > Yes, and it should. The copy in v2/v3 is merely there for convenience.
> >
> >
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 09:36:04AM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 06:41:19AM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> > * Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070703 01:32]:
> > > I don't have a strong opinion either way (as long as we don't have
> > > _forks_ of code for v1 and v2, which i
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 06:41:19AM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> * Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070703 01:32]:
> > I don't have a strong opinion either way (as long as we don't have
> > _forks_ of code for v1 and v2, which is why we now use svn:externals).
>
> I like the way doing the forks
* Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070704 01:28]:
> Get v2:
> svn co svn://linuxbios.org/repos/trunk/LinuxBIOSv2
>
> Get only flashrom:
> svn co svn://linuxbios.org/repos/trunk/util/flashrom
What was wrong with:
svn co svn://linuxbios.org/repos/trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/util/flashrom
??
> Get everyth
* Peter Stuge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070704 00:10]:
> To have that, and get _only_ what you need when you need the
> utilities they get their own repo. I think that makes the most
> sense logically too.
>
> I am definately for the externals so they are pulled into both v2 and
> v3 co:s too.
>
> How
* ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070703 18:19]:
> I don't care where flashrom is but it is really nice if ONE co is all
> that is needed to get all you need.
I do care for flashrom, and I think it should be in v3 (using externals
or not)
--
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i
* Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070703 01:32]:
> I don't have a strong opinion either way (as long as we don't have
> _forks_ of code for v1 and v2, which is why we now use svn:externals).
I like the way doing the forks as they really allow us to progress with
new code while leaving old code i
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 12:10:29AM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 09:19:12AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
> > I don't care where flashrom is but it is really nice if ONE co is
> > all that is needed to get all you need.
>
> To have that, and get _only_ what you need when you need
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 09:19:12AM -0700, ron minnich wrote:
> I don't care where flashrom is but it is really nice if ONE co is
> all that is needed to get all you need.
To have that, and get _only_ what you need when you need the
utilities they get their own repo. I think that makes the most
sen
I don't care where flashrom is but it is really nice if ONE co is all
that is needed to get all you need.
thanks
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:32:36AM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 08:00:57PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> > I fully agree with the earlier stuff, but is there any reason to keep
> > this in the v3 tree? People will not be that unhappy if they're required
> > to pull in the fl
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 08:00:57PM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> I fully agree with the earlier stuff, but is there any reason to keep
> this in the v3 tree? People will not be that unhappy if they're required
> to pull in the flashrom utility seperately,
I fully agree, it's not required. Some de
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 09:02:54PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> please note that we're planning to create a new top-level directory
> 'util' in svn where independant utilities (which are not tied to a
> certain LinuxBIOS version) will reside.
>
> One of these utilities will be flashrom
Hi all,
please note that we're planning to create a new top-level directory
'util' in svn where independant utilities (which are not tied to a
certain LinuxBIOS version) will reside.
One of these utilities will be flashrom, but others will follow.
The new repository layout will look like this:
15 matches
Mail list logo
