* Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061028 22:33]:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:28:46PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> > one thing, which would also allow a really quick checking on your own
> > machine (or therefore centrally on linuxbios.org as well) is to drop
> > romcc. This will get
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:28:46PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> one thing, which would also allow a really quick checking on your own
> machine (or therefore centrally on linuxbios.org as well) is to drop
> romcc. This will get build times per board from several minutes back to
> several s
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 12:49:38PM -0500, Richard Smith wrote:
> Because on my laptop (which I do a lot of work on) it takes over an
> hour to run abuild. I suspect a lot of people don't run abuild localy
> since it takes so long to run.
>
> But you have abuild on a fast machine that I can s
>
> Anyone into clusters? ;-)
openMosix is O'k? ;-)
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
* ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061027 20:25]:
> maybe this:
> svn diff
> send proposed patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> test account applies patch, if patch fails to apply, mail back to user
> test account runs abuild, if fails, mail back to user
> test account send abuild-passed and patch to maili
* Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061027 19:49]:
> >> list? That could be the first step for getting it approved.
> >> That way you know its abuild clean before you review it.
> >
> >Are you suggesting a development and a stable tree?
>
> No.
>
> >Is this better than running abuild locally? (
maybe this:
svn diff
send proposed patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
test account applies patch, if patch fails to apply, mail back to user
test account runs abuild, if fails, mail back to user
test account send abuild-passed and patch to mailing list for approval
??
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxb
> > list? That could be the first step for getting it approved.
> > That way you know its abuild clean before you review it.
>
> Are you suggesting a development and a stable tree?
No.
> Is this better than running abuild locally? (besides potential tool
> chain issues)
Because on my laptop (wh
* Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061027 15:18]:
> LinuxBIOS information wrote:
>
> > Build Log:
> > Configuration of dell:s1850 has ben broken
> > Configuration of intel:jarrell has ben broken
> > Configuration of supermicro:x6dai_g has ben broken
> > Configuration of supermicro:x6dhe_g has be
LinuxBIOS information wrote:
> Build Log:
> Configuration of dell:s1850 has ben broken
> Configuration of intel:jarrell has ben broken
> Configuration of supermicro:x6dai_g has ben broken
> Configuration of supermicro:x6dhe_g has ben broken
> Configuration of supermicro:x6dhe_g2 has ben broken
> C
Dear LinuxBIOS readers!
This is the automated build check service of LinuxBIOS.
The developer "uwe" checked in revision 2477 to
the LinuxBIOS source repository and caused the following
changes:
Change Log:
Rename E7520 to e7520, and E7525 to e7525 in the code. The next commit
will then rename t
11 matches
Mail list logo