On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 05:22:49PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:06:33AM -0700, Dino Farinacci wrote:
> > > I'm not sure I understand the need for "use a different key for
> > > consecutive
> > > messages", but probably we should just talk about that on Tuesday.
> >
>
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:06:33AM -0700, Dino Farinacci wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understand the need for "use a different key for consecutive
> > messages", but probably we should just talk about that on Tuesday.
>
> Well in your last reply you felt it was okay if we used the nonce in each
> Ma
> I'm not sure I understand the need for "use a different key for consecutive
> messages", but probably we should just talk about that on Tuesday.
Well in your last reply you felt it was okay if we used the nonce in each
Map-Register for a new key per message.
What this addition brings is use o
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 03:27:26PM -0700, Dino Farinacci wrote:
> Ben regarding using PSKs for Map-Registers. How about we do this:
>
> (1) The ETR and map-server can be provisioned with up to 256 keys.
> (2) Each Map-Register uses one of the 256 keys buy doing a random number
> modulo 256.
> (3)
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 02:10:19PM -0700, Fabio Maino wrote:
> On 3/20/19 8:05 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 03:01:07PM -0700, Fabio Maino wrote:
> >> Hi Ben,
> >> I'm starting this separated thread to discuss this point.
> > Thanks for splitting it off.
> >
> >> On 2/7/19 5