[IFWP] A related trademark issue

1999-12-17 Thread Andy Oram
Only tenuously related to domain names, but definitely an important ruling that re-establishes traditional limits on trademarks. Andy --- http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/12/cyber/cyberlaw/17law.html Former Playboy Model Wins Right to Use Keywords ... In a closely reasone

[IFWP] BOUNCE list@ifwp.org: Non-member submission from [Paul Cabana ]

1999-12-17 Thread Richard J. Sexton
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [Paul Cabana ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] >Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1999 13:47:04 -0500 (EST) > >>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri D

[IFWP] whois.god is online

1999-12-17 Thread baptista
Just running some whois tests of dot.god's whois server. Were now running some test records - so the following will work whois -h whois.pccf.net icann.god whois -h whois.pccf.net nic.god whois -h whois.pccf.net baptista.god regards joe -- J. Baptista Planet Commun

Re: [IFWP] CPSR Comment on Domain Name Expansion (WG-C/DNSO/ICANN)

1999-12-17 Thread Richard J. Sexton
At 08:31 AM 12/17/99 -0800, you wrote: >On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Hans K. Klein wrote: > >> In short, the DNSO has a historic opportunity to change the TLD namespace >> from its current status as a contraint on the development of the Internet, >> not to mention a battleground for wasteful disputes, int

Re: [IFWP] CPSR Comment on Domain Name Expansion (WG-C/DNSO/ICANN)

1999-12-17 Thread Patrick Greenwell
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Hans K. Klein wrote: > In short, the DNSO has a historic opportunity to change the TLD namespace > from its current status as a contraint on the development of the Internet, > not to mention a battleground for wasteful disputes, into a force for > innovation consistent with t

[IFWP] CPSR Comment on Domain Name Expansion (WG-C/DNSO/ICANN)

1999-12-17 Thread Hans K. Klein
Comment on Interim Report of Working Group C of the Domain Name Supporting Organization, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Submitted to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] December 17, 1999 by

[IFWP] not related - but interesting y2k

1999-12-17 Thread baptista
I find the following sort of thing comforting. Just remember, when the big one comes - we'll all go together. The dns will however survive y2k, not all of it. I expect alot of failure - but it will be progressive and compounded by time. MARINES ISSUE Y2K GAG ORDER (Source: FCW) Marine C