Can they not limit liabilities by contract?
At 04:21 PM 3/25/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>Hello Stephen --
>
>My take on all this is that;
>
>First: The .us TLD has been a wasteland since it was created.
>(This is why I have always avoided any us of .US;-)...
>
>and that;
>
>Second: Now it is going to
time, how about a longer conversation? You can
call in the evenings (508 820-1889).
Best regards.
Tamar
At 12:10 PM 1/14/00 -0500, you wrote:
>At 08:30 AM 1/14/00 , Tamar Frankel wrote:
>
>>In the US legitimacy is gained more by the trustworthiness of the system
>>than that
I must go, but will return in a few days and we can continue the
discussion. Thanks for responding.
Tamar
At 01:22 PM 11/24/99 -0800, you wrote:
>Richard and all,
>
>Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>
>> >>I did not conclude that all is lost, so long as I see some progress. The
>> >>alternatives scare me
I do not think we disagree. I certainly agree with Larry Lessig, and I did
read his book. We disagree on the timing. I am willing to be more patient,
and hope that people like you will continue to demand more accountability.
I did not conclude that all is lost, so long as I see some progress. The
Ken: I was the one who did not believe in the selection process of ICANN's
board and who spoke, whenever I could, for membership and election. But I
also recognize that ICANN has to be built. The current board is composed of
people whom I respect. It has the support of the government, conditioned
Ann Sching's book contains transparency mainly under lawsgoverning state
legislatures and state governments. Simon Lorne is an expert on the rules
that govern transparency in the US government in general, not only the SEC.
The US government and the US legislatures are not a bad model to examine
(n
To those who brought so many people from all over the world to the meeting
in Berlin. Many many thanks and compliments. You are breaking new grounds to
permit global open meetings.
Tamar
At 03:31 AM 5/27/99 +0200, you wrote:
>Deutsche Telekom provided Net connectivity, and Germanynet augmented
Governance can be viewed as an efficient mechanism for problem solving. If
spam is a problem for so many parties that a combined effort avoids
duplication and makes the solution less expensive, then a "governance" or
"self-governance" mechanism is likely to arise. Whether it will be
world-wide dep
One comment on constituencies: I define constituencies in terms of the
legitimate objectives and well being of the Internet as a whole:
(i) those who provide the infrastructure of the Internet. Without them there
would not be an Internet
(ii) those who are affected by the Internet, such as the l
I would like to subscribe to the Asia-Pacific forum. Thank you. Tamar Frankel
At 09:34 AM 2/15/99 -0800, you wrote:
>An Asia-Pacific Forum has JUST been created.
>
>List name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>List address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>List Desc: ap-forum
>To join: send an e-mail t
ere do you draw the line? I
believe that the line is drawn where competition and the law do not
adequately and efficiently protect users, and may reduce the trust in the
rest of the servicers.
Tamar
At 11:18 AM 2/16/99 -0500, you wrote:
>I agree with Ken.
>
>As I understand her, Tamar F
Must we choose? Can we not have a representation of both?
Tamar
At 09:31 AM 2/9/99 -0500, you wrote:
>I agree that membership will not likely attract the world population en
>mass. But every reference to "the lists" as being the only voice
>ignores people who do not use these lists or the Englis
Please do not unsubscribe me but keep me on the list
Tamar Frankel
At 08:09 AM 2/9/99 -0800, you wrote:
>
>
>
>
YOUR NAME HERE
Boston University School of Law
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I understand Jonathan's point to be that the interests of activist-Internet
users may not coincide with the interests of passive users, and that passive
users should have representation with all other interests that affect and
are affected by the Internet. After all, passive users affect the Inter
I am not an intellectual property maven, but will say this anyway. In our
discussion "property" is not the thing itself but the legal relationship
relating to a thing. One of the rights of an owner of property is the right
to exclude others from the use of the property. Some property rights are
lo
Just two comments: First, the applicable law is not the law governing
individual members of the board (persons or corporations) but the law
governing the institution--ICANN.
Second, the law applicable to a contract among institutions is usually the
law in which the contract is made. The internal
16 matches
Mail list logo