Paul and all,
Now Paul don't get carried away! LOL! I wasn't giving you any
career counseling of any sort. I was asking! Or did you miss the
question mark?
At any rate I had heard that you were having some difficulty at one point
not too long ago career wise form a fairly reliable source
Michael,
Get a grip on yourself! Sheeesh!
Michael Sondow wrote:
> Jeff Williams wrote:
> >
> > I am not answering your question for Paul,
>
> You and William Walsh are irremediable morons. For the first time, I
> had engaged a root server operator in a serious discussion, and you
> have sc
are you folks sick of me yet? if so, you'll need to stop cc'ing me.
> > > Well, if you want us to chip in so we can pay you to post
> > > your important announcements here I suppose we probably
> > > could. How much were you thinking?
like i said earlier, there's an ethical rudder consideration
> I am not answering your question for Paul, but my guess is that
> Paul believes, now anyway, that the big companies is where the
> big money is. Am I close here Paul? >;) At any rate, I can't blame
> Paul for making this decision for himself at this juncture in his
> career
the number
Jeff Williams wrote:
>
> I am not answering your question for Paul,
You and William Walsh are irremediable morons. For the first time, I
had engaged a root server operator in a serious discussion, and you
have scared him off with your idiot postings. You two have destroyed
the credibility of
> > > Mr. Vixie, everyone who has a domain name is your client.
> >
> > Show me the money. ("I'm not in this for your revolution, man.")
>
> That's very funny, Mr. Vixie, but I don't believe it. I'll bet you
> aren't in this for the money. But, then, why would you do what the
> big money guys w
William X. Walsh a écrit:
>
> > Well, if you want us to chip in so we can pay you to post
> > your important announcements here I suppose we probably
> > could. How much were you thinking?
That message of Mr. Vixie's was addressed to me. You've scared him
off, just when we were getting somewhere
William and all,
Shame on you WIlliam, suggesting that Paul would consider a bribe...
Tisk, Tisk!!!
William X. Walsh wrote:
> Wednesday, July 28, 1999, 5:59:44 PM, Richard J. Sexton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > At 05:29 PM 7/28/99 -0700, you wrote:
> >>> Mr. Vixie, everyone who has a doma
Michael and all,
I am not answering your question for Paul, but my guess is that
Paul believes, now anyway, that the big companies is where the
big money is. Am I close here Paul? >;) At any rate, I can't blame
Paul for making this decision for himself at this juncture in his
career
Mic
Paul A Vixie wrote:
>
> > Mr. Vixie, everyone who has a domain name is your client.
>
> Show me the money. ("I'm not in this for your revolution, man.")
That's very funny, Mr. Vixie, but I don't believe it. I'll bet you
aren't in this for the money. But, then, why would you do what the
big mon
At 05:29 PM 7/28/99 -0700, you wrote:
>> Mr. Vixie, everyone who has a domain name is your client.
>
>Show me the money. ("I'm not in this for your revolution, man.")
Well, if you want us to chip in so we can pay you to post
your important announcements here I suppose we probably
could. How much
> Mr. Vixie, everyone who has a domain name is your client.
Show me the money. ("I'm not in this for your revolution, man.")
> Well, I hate to say this, but are you a member of the Poisson list?
No.
Paul A Vixie a écrit:
>
> None of my clients has told me that they read ifwp. I see them each
> regularly and they have other ways to make their needs known to me.
Mr. Vixie, everyone who has a domain name is your client.
> The other reason I don't do ifwp is that it's got some of the flaming
> I wonder if you would be willing to comment on the question of multiple roots.
> It's an idea which has recently been attracting renewed vigor in these crowds,
> and its supporters are so energetic, I sometimes wonder whether some new sort
> of alternate root launch is imminent. Outspoken advo
> Well, I assume that you do whatever it is you do for some purpose,
> don't you? It's not just to amuse yourself, is it? So engaging in
> discussion once in a while with the beneficiaries of the service you
> provide, and not just with those who do it, seems to me to be a
> worthwhile idea. No bu
Paul A Vixie wrote:
>
> discussion among the people whose job is to do it, is worthwhile to me.
>
> discussion by the people who think they should have been consulted is
> worthless to me. probably it is not worthless to you, or to the many
> (i'm sure) subscribers to the ifwp list. i'd have n
> Well, I'm not familar with your code-language, I just speak plain
> English (and Spanish, French, Italian, and German), but I don't
> think a discussion of creating new A roots is pointless, given the
> present circumstances, do you?
discussion among the people whose job is to do it, is worthwh
You wrote:
>
> actually i'm just trying to stay out of pointless nonterminal discussions.
Well, I'm not familar with your code-language, I just speak plain
English (and Spanish, French, Italian, and German), but I don't
think a discussion of creating new A roots is pointless, given the
present c
At 09:31 PM 7/27/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Paul A Vixie wrote:
>>
>> i didn't say the people were worthless. some of ifwp's subscribers
>> are folks i'm proud to call my friends. but the list is "worthless to > me."
>
>Sounds to me like you're trying to hide. Are you afraid to debate
>with people o
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, Michael Sondow wrote:
> Paul A Vixie wrote:
> >
> > i didn't say the people were worthless. some of ifwp's subscribers
> > are folks i'm proud to call my friends. but the list is "worthless to > me."
>
> Sounds to me like you're trying to hide. Are you afraid to debate
>
Paul A Vixie wrote:
>
> i didn't say the people were worthless. some of ifwp's subscribers
> are folks i'm proud to call my friends. but the list is "worthless to > me."
Sounds to me like you're trying to hide. Are you afraid to debate
with people outside your small circle of Internet infrastr
ondow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [fr] (Win95; I)
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > To: Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [IFWP] vix
> > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Content-Type: text
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
>
> Besides the fact that it is Jon, not John, and that everybody should be able
> to decide by him/herself whether he/she is in need to read something or not,
> my opinion is that Paul's reply should not be isolated from the context,
> which was a forwarded message by
Michael,
>
> taken over John's NewCo. Only a fool would continue to refuse to
> listen to those who oppose them, many of whom post to the IFWP. It
> is not we who are in need of your messages, but you who are in need
> of ours.
>
Besides the fact that it is Jon, not John, and that everybody sh
Mr. Vixie-
You have uncritically supported the ICANN conspiracy since it began
merely because you believe it is John Postel's legacy. Well, Mr.
Postel is dead, and Don Heath, Javier Sola, and David Maher have
taken over John's NewCo. Only a fool would continue to refuse to
listen to those who opp
25 matches
Mail list logo
