subject:"\[llvm\-branch\-commits\] \[llvm\] release\/20.x\: \[RISCV\] Fix assertion failure when using \-fstack\-clash\-protection \(#135248\) \(PR #139388\)"

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

2025-06-12 Thread Craig Topper via llvm-branch-commits


https://github.com/topperc updated 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139388

>From ff4132ec328ed80be247856939dbf7345106cc55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth 
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:12:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using
 -fstack-clash-protection (#135248)

We can't assume MBBI is still pointing at MBB if we've already expanded
a probe. We need to re-query the MBB from MBBI. Fixes #135206

Co-authored-by: Craig Topper 
(cherry picked from commit b3d2dc321c5c78b7204696afe07fe6ef3375acfd)
---
 llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp |  8 +-
 llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll  | 84 
 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp 
b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp
index bb2e5781c34db..6f4c1e16190f4 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp
@@ -2135,11 +2135,13 @@ TargetStackID::Value 
RISCVFrameLowering::getStackIDForScalableVectors() const {
 }
 
 // Synthesize the probe loop.
-static void emitStackProbeInline(MachineFunction &MF, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
- MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI, DebugLoc DL,
+static void emitStackProbeInline(MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI, DebugLoc DL,
  Register TargetReg, bool IsRVV) {
   assert(TargetReg != RISCV::X2 && "New top of stack cannot already be in SP");
 
+  MachineBasicBlock &MBB = *MBBI->getParent();
+  MachineFunction &MF = *MBB.getParent();
+
   auto &Subtarget = MF.getSubtarget();
   const RISCVInstrInfo *TII = Subtarget.getInstrInfo();
   bool IsRV64 = Subtarget.is64Bit();
@@ -2228,7 +2230,7 @@ void RISCVFrameLowering::inlineStackProbe(MachineFunction 
&MF,
   MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI = MI->getIterator();
   DebugLoc DL = MBB.findDebugLoc(MBBI);
   Register TargetReg = MI->getOperand(1).getReg();
-  emitStackProbeInline(MF, MBB, MBBI, DL, TargetReg,
+  emitStackProbeInline(MBBI, DL, TargetReg,
(MI->getOpcode() == RISCV::PROBED_STACKALLOC_RVV));
   MBBI->eraseFromParent();
 }
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll 
b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0..196e78d8ed8b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py 
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc -mtriple riscv64 < %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+%"buff" = type { [4096 x i64] }
+
+declare void @llvm.memset.p0.i64(ptr, i8, i64, i1)
+declare void @bar()
+
+define i1 @foo() nounwind "probe-stack"="inline-asm" "target-features"="+v" {
+; CHECK-LABEL: foo:
+; CHECK:   # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi sp, sp, -2032
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd ra, 2024(sp) # 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s0, 2016(sp) # 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s1, 2008(sp) # 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s2, 2000(sp) # 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s3, 1992(sp) # 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui a0, 7
+; CHECK-NEXT:sub t1, sp, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui t2, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB0_1: # =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
+; CHECK-NEXT:sub sp, sp, t2
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd zero, 0(sp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:bne sp, t1, .LBB0_1
+; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.2:
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi sp, sp, -2048
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi sp, sp, -96
+; CHECK-NEXT:csrr t1, vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui t2, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB0_3: # =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
+; CHECK-NEXT:sub sp, sp, t2
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd zero, 0(sp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:sub t1, t1, t2
+; CHECK-NEXT:bge t1, t2, .LBB0_3
+; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.4:
+; CHECK-NEXT:sub sp, sp, t1
+; CHECK-NEXT:li a0, 86
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi s0, sp, 48
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi s1, sp, 32
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi s2, sp, 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui a1, 353637
+; CHECK-NEXT:vsetivli zero, 16, e8, m1, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT:vmv.v.x v8, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui a0, 8
+; CHECK-NEXT:addiw a0, a0, 32
+; CHECK-NEXT:add a0, sp, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT:vs1r.v v8, (a0) # vscale x 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:addiw a0, a1, 1622
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s0)
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s1)
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s2)
+; CHECK-NEXT:slli a1, a0, 32
+; CHECK-NEXT:add s3, a0, a1
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s3, 64(sp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:call bar
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui a0, 8
+; CHECK-NEXT:addiw a0, a0, 32
+; CHECK-NEXT:add a0, sp, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT:vl1r.v v8, (a0) # vscale x 8-byte Folded Reload
+; CHECK-NEXT:vsetivli zero, 16, e8, m1, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s0)
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s1)
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s2)
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s3, 64(sp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:li a0, 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:csrr a1, vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:add sp, sp, a1
+; CHECK-NEXT:

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

2025-06-12 Thread Tom Stellard via llvm-branch-commits


tstellar wrote:

@topperc You should be able to push to this branch.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139388
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

2025-06-12 Thread Craig Topper via llvm-branch-commits


topperc wrote:

@tstellar This is the fix. Can I push to this PR or do I need to make a new PR 
from my fork?

```
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll 
b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll
index 196e78d8ed8b..859179f62d70 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ define i1 @foo() nounwind "probe-stack"="inline-asm" 
"target-features"="+v" {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:lui a0, 8
 ; CHECK-NEXT:addiw a0, a0, 32
 ; CHECK-NEXT:add a0, sp, a0
-; CHECK-NEXT:vs1r.v v8, (a0) # vscale x 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:vs1r.v v8, (a0) # Unknown-size Folded Spill
 ; CHECK-NEXT:addiw a0, a1, 1622
 ; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s0)
 ; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s1)
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ define i1 @foo() nounwind "probe-stack"="inline-asm" 
"target-features"="+v" {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:lui a0, 8
 ; CHECK-NEXT:addiw a0, a0, 32
 ; CHECK-NEXT:add a0, sp, a0
-; CHECK-NEXT:vl1r.v v8, (a0) # vscale x 8-byte Folded Reload
+; CHECK-NEXT:vl1r.v v8, (a0) # Unknown-size Folded Reload
 ; CHECK-NEXT:vsetivli zero, 16, e8, m1, ta, ma
 ; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s0)
 ; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s1)
```

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139388
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

2025-06-11 Thread Tom Stellard via llvm-branch-commits


tstellar wrote:

It looks like there are some test failures with this backport.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139388
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

2025-05-10 Thread via llvm-branch-commits


https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139388
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

2025-05-10 Thread via llvm-branch-commits


eyestoreoye wrote:

Very clean code with good test coverage. This is a great example of best 
practices.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139388
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

2025-05-10 Thread via llvm-branch-commits


llvmbot wrote:

@preames What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139388
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

2025-05-10 Thread via llvm-branch-commits


llvmbot wrote:




@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v

Author: None (llvmbot)


Changes

Backport b3d2dc321c5c78b7204696afe07fe6ef3375acfd

Requested by: @tstellar

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139388.diff


2 Files Affected:

- (modified) llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp (+5-3) 
- (added) llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll (+84) 


``diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp 
b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp
index bb2e5781c34db..6f4c1e16190f4 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp
@@ -2135,11 +2135,13 @@ TargetStackID::Value 
RISCVFrameLowering::getStackIDForScalableVectors() const {
 }
 
 // Synthesize the probe loop.
-static void emitStackProbeInline(MachineFunction &MF, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
- MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI, DebugLoc DL,
+static void emitStackProbeInline(MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI, DebugLoc DL,
  Register TargetReg, bool IsRVV) {
   assert(TargetReg != RISCV::X2 && "New top of stack cannot already be in SP");
 
+  MachineBasicBlock &MBB = *MBBI->getParent();
+  MachineFunction &MF = *MBB.getParent();
+
   auto &Subtarget = MF.getSubtarget();
   const RISCVInstrInfo *TII = Subtarget.getInstrInfo();
   bool IsRV64 = Subtarget.is64Bit();
@@ -2228,7 +2230,7 @@ void RISCVFrameLowering::inlineStackProbe(MachineFunction 
&MF,
   MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI = MI->getIterator();
   DebugLoc DL = MBB.findDebugLoc(MBBI);
   Register TargetReg = MI->getOperand(1).getReg();
-  emitStackProbeInline(MF, MBB, MBBI, DL, TargetReg,
+  emitStackProbeInline(MBBI, DL, TargetReg,
(MI->getOpcode() == RISCV::PROBED_STACKALLOC_RVV));
   MBBI->eraseFromParent();
 }
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll 
b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0..196e78d8ed8b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py 
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc -mtriple riscv64 < %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+%"buff" = type { [4096 x i64] }
+
+declare void @llvm.memset.p0.i64(ptr, i8, i64, i1)
+declare void @bar()
+
+define i1 @foo() nounwind "probe-stack"="inline-asm" "target-features"="+v" {
+; CHECK-LABEL: foo:
+; CHECK:   # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi sp, sp, -2032
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd ra, 2024(sp) # 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s0, 2016(sp) # 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s1, 2008(sp) # 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s2, 2000(sp) # 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s3, 1992(sp) # 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui a0, 7
+; CHECK-NEXT:sub t1, sp, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui t2, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB0_1: # =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
+; CHECK-NEXT:sub sp, sp, t2
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd zero, 0(sp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:bne sp, t1, .LBB0_1
+; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.2:
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi sp, sp, -2048
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi sp, sp, -96
+; CHECK-NEXT:csrr t1, vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui t2, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB0_3: # =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
+; CHECK-NEXT:sub sp, sp, t2
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd zero, 0(sp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:sub t1, t1, t2
+; CHECK-NEXT:bge t1, t2, .LBB0_3
+; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.4:
+; CHECK-NEXT:sub sp, sp, t1
+; CHECK-NEXT:li a0, 86
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi s0, sp, 48
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi s1, sp, 32
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi s2, sp, 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui a1, 353637
+; CHECK-NEXT:vsetivli zero, 16, e8, m1, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT:vmv.v.x v8, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui a0, 8
+; CHECK-NEXT:addiw a0, a0, 32
+; CHECK-NEXT:add a0, sp, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT:vs1r.v v8, (a0) # vscale x 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:addiw a0, a1, 1622
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s0)
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s1)
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s2)
+; CHECK-NEXT:slli a1, a0, 32
+; CHECK-NEXT:add s3, a0, a1
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s3, 64(sp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:call bar
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui a0, 8
+; CHECK-NEXT:addiw a0, a0, 32
+; CHECK-NEXT:add a0, sp, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT:vl1r.v v8, (a0) # vscale x 8-byte Folded Reload
+; CHECK-NEXT:vsetivli zero, 16, e8, m1, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s0)
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s1)
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s2)
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s3, 64(sp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:li a0, 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:csrr a1, vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:add sp, sp, a1
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui a1, 8
+; CHECK-NEXT:addiw a1, a1, -1952
+; CHECK-NEXT:add sp, sp, a1
+; CHECK-NEXT:ld ra, 2024(sp) # 8-byte Folded Reload
+; CHECK-NEXT:ld s0, 2016(sp) # 8-byte Folded Reload
+; CHECK-NEXT:ld s1, 2008(sp) # 8-byte Folded Reload
+; CHECK-NEXT:ld s2, 2000(sp) # 8-byte Folded Reload
+; CHECK-NEXT:ld s3, 1992(sp) # 8-byte Folded Reload
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi sp,

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

2025-05-10 Thread via llvm-branch-commits


https://github.com/llvmbot created 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139388

Backport b3d2dc321c5c78b7204696afe07fe6ef3375acfd

Requested by: @tstellar

>From ff4132ec328ed80be247856939dbf7345106cc55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth 
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:12:52 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using
 -fstack-clash-protection (#135248)

We can't assume MBBI is still pointing at MBB if we've already expanded
a probe. We need to re-query the MBB from MBBI. Fixes #135206

Co-authored-by: Craig Topper 
(cherry picked from commit b3d2dc321c5c78b7204696afe07fe6ef3375acfd)
---
 llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp |  8 +-
 llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll  | 84 
 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp 
b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp
index bb2e5781c34db..6f4c1e16190f4 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp
@@ -2135,11 +2135,13 @@ TargetStackID::Value 
RISCVFrameLowering::getStackIDForScalableVectors() const {
 }
 
 // Synthesize the probe loop.
-static void emitStackProbeInline(MachineFunction &MF, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
- MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI, DebugLoc DL,
+static void emitStackProbeInline(MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI, DebugLoc DL,
  Register TargetReg, bool IsRVV) {
   assert(TargetReg != RISCV::X2 && "New top of stack cannot already be in SP");
 
+  MachineBasicBlock &MBB = *MBBI->getParent();
+  MachineFunction &MF = *MBB.getParent();
+
   auto &Subtarget = MF.getSubtarget();
   const RISCVInstrInfo *TII = Subtarget.getInstrInfo();
   bool IsRV64 = Subtarget.is64Bit();
@@ -2228,7 +2230,7 @@ void RISCVFrameLowering::inlineStackProbe(MachineFunction 
&MF,
   MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI = MI->getIterator();
   DebugLoc DL = MBB.findDebugLoc(MBBI);
   Register TargetReg = MI->getOperand(1).getReg();
-  emitStackProbeInline(MF, MBB, MBBI, DL, TargetReg,
+  emitStackProbeInline(MBBI, DL, TargetReg,
(MI->getOpcode() == RISCV::PROBED_STACKALLOC_RVV));
   MBBI->eraseFromParent();
 }
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll 
b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0..196e78d8ed8b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr135206.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py 
UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc -mtriple riscv64 < %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+%"buff" = type { [4096 x i64] }
+
+declare void @llvm.memset.p0.i64(ptr, i8, i64, i1)
+declare void @bar()
+
+define i1 @foo() nounwind "probe-stack"="inline-asm" "target-features"="+v" {
+; CHECK-LABEL: foo:
+; CHECK:   # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi sp, sp, -2032
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd ra, 2024(sp) # 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s0, 2016(sp) # 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s1, 2008(sp) # 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s2, 2000(sp) # 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s3, 1992(sp) # 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui a0, 7
+; CHECK-NEXT:sub t1, sp, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui t2, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB0_1: # =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
+; CHECK-NEXT:sub sp, sp, t2
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd zero, 0(sp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:bne sp, t1, .LBB0_1
+; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.2:
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi sp, sp, -2048
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi sp, sp, -96
+; CHECK-NEXT:csrr t1, vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui t2, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB0_3: # =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
+; CHECK-NEXT:sub sp, sp, t2
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd zero, 0(sp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:sub t1, t1, t2
+; CHECK-NEXT:bge t1, t2, .LBB0_3
+; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.4:
+; CHECK-NEXT:sub sp, sp, t1
+; CHECK-NEXT:li a0, 86
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi s0, sp, 48
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi s1, sp, 32
+; CHECK-NEXT:addi s2, sp, 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui a1, 353637
+; CHECK-NEXT:vsetivli zero, 16, e8, m1, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT:vmv.v.x v8, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui a0, 8
+; CHECK-NEXT:addiw a0, a0, 32
+; CHECK-NEXT:add a0, sp, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT:vs1r.v v8, (a0) # vscale x 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:addiw a0, a1, 1622
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s0)
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s1)
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s2)
+; CHECK-NEXT:slli a1, a0, 32
+; CHECK-NEXT:add s3, a0, a1
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s3, 64(sp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:call bar
+; CHECK-NEXT:lui a0, 8
+; CHECK-NEXT:addiw a0, a0, 32
+; CHECK-NEXT:add a0, sp, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT:vl1r.v v8, (a0) # vscale x 8-byte Folded Reload
+; CHECK-NEXT:vsetivli zero, 16, e8, m1, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s0)
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s1)
+; CHECK-NEXT:vse8.v v8, (s2)
+; CHECK-NEXT:sd s3, 64(sp)
+; CHECK-NEXT:li a0, 0
+; CHECK-NEX

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] release/20.x: [RISCV] Fix assertion failure when using -fstack-clash-protection (#135248) (PR #139388)

9 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information