[Ltsp-discuss] Fwd: sgi_fam

2002-02-07 Thread Ragnar Wisløff
This didn't seem to show up on the list. Trying again. - Videresendt melding fra Ragnar Wisløff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Dato: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 23:44:31 +0100 Fra: Ragnar Wisløff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Svar-til:Ragnar Wisløff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Emne: sgi_fam Til: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Motherboard

2002-02-07 Thread Joe George
Hi, We just setup a 10 workstation LTSP using the ECS K7SEM266 motherboard for clients. It has the SiS 730 Chipset, Sound, video, LAN, 2 PCI, 1 AGP, 1 AMR, 1 CNR, micro ATX and supports AMD Athlon XP / Duron CPUs. It goes for US$60-70. Joe Vamsidhar Mullangi wrote: > hello jim > I made m

[Ltsp-discuss] is there anything about cdroms on xterminals

2002-02-07 Thread fam.valverde
is there any package to be able to use local cdrom?

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Shadowing Logged in Users

2002-02-07 Thread Abraham Pearson
There were two good articles on running VNC transparently in Linux Jounal. It sounds good, but I have not tried it yet. Check out http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=5499 and http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=5560. I would like to know if any one has tried this. It looks in

[Ltsp-discuss] Re: Upgrade to ltsp 3.0 a risk? Re: floppy support on ltsp 2.08

2002-02-07 Thread Keld Jørn Simonsen
One risk I see with upgrading to 3.0 is that the sound support is not so easy. At least I could not get it to work, as the install script for sound was for 2.08, not for 3.0. So you may have your sound working under 2.08 which would go away for 3.0 Is there any work going on for sound support fo

[Ltsp-discuss] sgi_fam

2002-02-07 Thread Ragnar Wisløff
On my RHL server there is an sgi_fam service run by xinetd. This reports broken pipes in the syslog, and I turned it off to see what would happen. Now most my KDE-based apps like KOffice, Konqueror runs at a much higher speed. Am I running without safety net here? The fam man page says it shoul

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] Upgrade to ltsp 3.0 a risk? Re: floppy support on ltsp 2.08

2002-02-07 Thread Egan, Matt B. (Artco)
You can install version 3 and still run your old version (correct me if I'm wrong) that is what I'm doing I have most people using 2.08 but I've installed and tested version 3 along side the 2.08 without any complications. So you could fire it up set a couple machines to use the v3 kernels make s

[Ltsp-discuss] Upgrade to ltsp 3.0 a risk? Re: floppy support on ltsp 2.08

2002-02-07 Thread Henrik Ormåsen
Thu, 07 Feb 2002, Ragnar Wisløff skrev: > Upgrade to ltsp version 3 and read the news about updated floppyd on > the news page of http://www.ltsp.org. Floppy on ltsp 3 is quite easy. Don't know if I dear to upgrade. It's a little office for an ideal organization were I'm using my spare time.

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] floppy support on ltsp 2.08

2002-02-07 Thread Ragnar Wisløff
Sitat Henrik Ormåsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi! > > I hacked the script for ltsp 3.0, so it should function. But I get > the > error message: > > [root@malmserver henrik]# mdir a: > Can't open /dev/fd0: Device or resource busy > Cannot initialize 'A:' > > Some months ago I tried to get

[Ltsp-discuss] floppy support on ltsp 2.08

2002-02-07 Thread Henrik Ormåsen
Hi! I hacked the script for ltsp 3.0, so it should function. But I get the error message: [root@malmserver henrik]# mdir a: Can't open /dev/fd0: Device or resource busy Cannot initialize 'A:' Some months ago I tried to get floppy access using nbd (http://www.ltsp.org/contrib/LTSP_FLOPPY.

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] (no subject)

2002-02-07 Thread jam
Francois, When you get your machine connected to the internet, please send me a copy of your scripts. I'd like to see exactly what you did. Thanks, Jim McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, François Mauger wrote: > On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Cobus wrote: > > > Hi! > > Has anyone starte

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Incomplete installation

2002-02-07 Thread jam
Fivda, What you are describing is completely normal. When the workstation boots up, it creates a ramdisk and mounts it on the /tmp directory. Then, it creates those files that are missing, which causes the symlinks to be correct. As for the /dev directory, LTSP now uses devfs, which automatica

[Ltsp-discuss] A question of noise

2002-02-07 Thread Alan Truesdale
Hello List This will be my third ltsp install I've (we've) done a test install, one for our LUG so we can have computers for an intro to Linux class, this one will be for a local community center. The first two installations had no requirement for sound but this one does. I have a couple questions

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Incomplete installation

2002-02-07 Thread Dario Rapisardi
Hi Fivda, There seem to be nothing wrong with your installation. It's normal to have broken links, since the /opt/ltsp/i386/ directory will be mounted by the workstation as its root filesystem, and by then the links will be pointing correctly to /tmp/x. By the other hand, the /opt/lts

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] (no subject)

2002-02-07 Thread François Mauger
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Cobus wrote: > Hi! > Has anyone started KDE as a local-App on the workstation? if so could you please >tell me how!!! > Cobus Hill > I chosed to use ltsp209 (RH71) to boot my ws (celeron 800MHz/RAM 129Mb) but i run **everything** locally: kdm , kde then everything. For this

[Ltsp-discuss] Incomplete installation

2002-02-07 Thread Fivda Harry
Hi, I need help. I'm using RH7.2 distro with upgraded kernel to 2.4.13, and tried these installation files: ltsp_core-3.0.0-1.i386.rpm , ltsp_core-3.0.0-i386.tgz ltsp_kernel-3.0.1-1.i386.rpm, ltsp_kernel-3.0.1-i386.tgz ltsp_x_core-3.0.1-1.i386.rpm, ltsp_x_core-3.0.1-i386.tgz ltsp_x_fonts-3.0.0-0.