Re: [Ltsp-discuss] lts.conf problem

2004-07-19 Thread Liam Marshall
At 02:20 PM 7/16/2004, John McCreesh wrote: You may be lucky - try: SOUND = Y SOUND_DAEMON = esd SMODULE_01 = auto But if that doesn't work you have to specify the modules manually. I have to use the following with a Crystal: SOUND = Y SOUND_D

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] workstation crash

2004-07-19 Thread Jeff Nelson
Jim, Forgot to mention in my last message: > Also, can you describe the failure ? > > Is the machine locking up? > Is the Xserver just crashing, and going back to the login > prompt ? > > If it's the latter, i'd suspect an Xserver problem. In which case, > it might be good to try LTSP-4.1, whi

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] workstation crash

2004-07-19 Thread Jeff Nelson
Jim, Thanks for your helpfulness; I'll try and give you some more data so that maybe we can get to the bottom of this. > o Version of LTSP. I'm using standard LTSP-4.0, not k12ltsp. K12LTSP 4.0.1 > o Version of the kernel. I'm using 2.4.24-ltsp-1. I think it's also 2.4.24-ltsp-1; here's my

[Ltsp-discuss] Multiple Monitors

2004-07-19 Thread Josemar Lohn
Hello all: I'm trying to make a dual monitor configuration, with thinclients and LTSP 4.0 (3.0 kernel). And I can't get it running. Can anyone tell me if the X version included in the package support this feature? And can anyone help me on how to do this? Thanks. --

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Video memory

2004-07-19 Thread jam
Craig, excellent point. When you tried the nvidia, were you using the nv driver from Xfree86/Xorg, or did you try the vendor supplied driver ? Jim McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Craig Ringer wrote: > On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 01:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > As you can se

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Video memory

2004-07-19 Thread Craig Ringer
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 01:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > As you can see, with that resolution/depth, you would only be using > about 1.5mb of video ram. Any more doesn't help. Indeed. However, a newer, faster card _can_ help performance a lot. I've seen incredible improvements moving from S3 Trio

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Video memory

2004-07-19 Thread Nick
Hello Richard 2.5Mb of video memory is sufficient to operate a screen at 1024x768 true colour. 1024 x 768 x 3 bytes. Additional memory may be used by a graphics rendering engine. Since you are not likely to be rendering 3d texturised trixel scapes, the extra video memory will not be useful. The req

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Video memory

2004-07-19 Thread jam
Richard, I don't think the additional video memory will help at all. If you were running 3D, it probably would be of some value, but most people are doing 2D. A simple way to see how much video memory you actually need is to use the following formula: Required_mem = ( height_pixels * width_

[Ltsp-discuss] Video memory

2004-07-19 Thread Richard Houston
Hi all, I know this may be slightly off topic but it is related to LTSP. :) I have several clients machines that only have 8 meg video cards and am wondering if an upgrade to 32 or 64 meg card will enhance the LTSP or X experience in general. Wondering if anyone had any thoughts on this. Regard

[Ltsp-discuss] Video memory

2004-07-19 Thread Richard Houston
Hi all, I know this may be slightly off topic but it is related to LTSP. :) I have several clients machines that only have 8 meg video cards and am wondering if an upgrade to 32 or 64 meg card will enhance the LTSP or X experience in general. Wondering if anyone had any thoughts on this. Regard

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] video streaming

2004-07-19 Thread Michael Messner
Am Samstag, 17. Juli 2004 18:16 schrieb Michael Messner: > Am Freitag, 16. Juli 2004 16:27 schrieb Cian Cullinan: > > 2) As above, but run the video decoding/displaying app (VLC) as > > a local app on the clients. > > look here: > > http://www.users.fh-sbg.ac.at/~mmessner/download/Beta/ new URL:

[Ltsp-discuss] Re: Updates to LTSP-4.1 Beta 1

2004-07-19 Thread Charles Marcus
LTSP-4.1 beta 1 is going really well. We've been squishing lots of bugs, and things are looking good. This is sounding really good, Jim... great work! I am curious though... any idea when the work will be done integrating LDAP as a backend, so that its implementation is simply a config option?

[Ltsp-discuss] XF86Config entries in lts.conf file

2004-07-19 Thread curtorkar
Hi ltsp users, i have upgraded ltsp3 to ltsp4. in my ltsp3 i had customized my xf86config files for different workstations having uncompatible display adapters. however lts.conf file for ltsp4 does not take the customised xf86config file. what could be the reason for this. i have gone through th

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] LTSP + http proxy on the same machine

2004-07-19 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 17:14, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > The typical way to set up a transparent http proxy is to put it on a > separate machine near the ISP connection. With LTSP, all the clients > are actually running browsers on the LTSP server. Can I run the LTSP > server and transparent proxy

[Ltsp-discuss] LTSP + http proxy on the same machine

2004-07-19 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
The typical way to set up a transparent http proxy is to put it on a separate machine near the ISP connection. With LTSP, all the clients are actually running browsers on the LTSP server. Can I run the LTSP server and transparent proxy on the same machine? A quick glance through iptables doc sug