Yes, IceWM is good enough but I don't have a choice but to use either
KDE or Gnome for this project.
In connection with this, which of the two is much faster to use for this
kind of an LTSP setup?
I don't know. KDE was considered more "bloated" (or complicated for fans
;o) than GNOME, however the
Hi all,
It gives me great pleasure to announce the release of OpenLab GNU/Linux
Version 3.2
It is currently available for download from http://www.direqlearn.org/olce
OpenLab is a different approach to the design of a GNU/Linux distribution,
built on the premise of "working out of the box". Vers
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 22:18, Derek Dresser wrote:
>
> Up until this fall I was running about 75 terminals (usually about 35-40
> active
> sessions) on a dual PIII 733Mhz with 2G of ram and had no performance
> problems.
> We now have a dual 3.2G Xeon with 4G of ram and about 100 terminals. I
>
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 15:54, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote:
> Hallo, Marvin
>
> It depends how responsible system do You want to have. I'd assume
> approx. double the users that Craige suggested, however I have no
> direct contact with such a large installation.
Well, this might be my first large
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 15:27, Eilert wrote:
> Hi Marvin,
>
> We've been running an LTSP server on a Xeon system quite similar to
> yours but with 2 GB RAM. There are 25 terminals connected at the moment,
> but not all of them are in use at the same time.
>
> Yesterday was the first time I saw 20
Look here:
http://www.ltsp.org/README.pxe
Peter wrote:
Hi 2 every1
I'm using many WS with LTSP. Few of them have NICs with PXE option, but
I can't (don't know how) to boot using PXE without floppies, so I use
floppies (rom-o-matic.com web) instead (which is disturbing).
I read (somewhere) ether
Hi
I can't compile lbe.
With the build_all script i get errors in bison, function mktmp dangerous,
in file.o
I work on Debian testing.
Thank´s
Oscar
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for F
Hi 2 every1
I'm using many WS with LTSP. Few of them have NICs with PXE option, but
I can't (don't know how) to boot using PXE without floppies, so I use
floppies (rom-o-matic.com web) instead (which is disturbing).
I read (somewhere) etherboot_PXE can download other/newer
etherboot_image & use
Ravi;
I don't know your requirements, but I have found the
"Barebones" thin clients from Caseoutlet to be quiet and
work well. With memory, they cost a little over $200.
Here is an example:
http://www.caseoutlet.com/shopexd.asp?id=203
With LTSP, a the bulk of the processing occurs on the
s
Thanks for the suggestions guys, I'll try everything at work tomorrow.
Its LTSP4.1, but the card is an S3 in some of the clients.
Some clients have 32 and others 64 MB RAM, and I haven't tried swap yet.
Not sure of the colour depth either.
I'll post again after checking or if I solve it.
nigel
Quoting "Marvin T. Pascual" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello all,
>
> Can anyone share their opinions on to how many workstations does LTSP
> supports
> with the following setup:
Up until this fall I was running about 75 terminals (usually about 35-40 active
sessions) on a dual PIII 733Mhz with 2G o
Hello!
I use Gigabyte G-MAX SA-4 V2.0
http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/DeskTop/Products/Products_NewProduct_List.htm
Felix Buschmann
On 10 Nov 2004 20:02 EET you wrote:
> Hello All,
> Can anyone suggest me a good barebone PC so that I can
> use it as an LTSP client. Currently, I got ASUS
Thanks. Nice to have some human readable settings for the clients.
--
Risto Pekkala
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for
Just waisted 1.5 hours to find any information or examples on
the LIKE keyword for lts.conf. I have seen one example just last
week. Can anyone help me?
I got a vanilla 2.6.9 kernel working with the 4.1 initrd. Any
recent news about a bootsplash-patch floating around? I only
find patches for 2.6.
14 matches
Mail list logo
