[Ltsp-discuss] Volker Mischo/Germany/IBM is out of the office.

2005-04-19 Thread Volker Mischo
I will be out of the office starting 20.04.2005 and will not return until 01.05.2005. I will be out of my office and will not return until 2 of Mai. In very urgent cases , you can leave me a message on my voice mail --- This SF.Net email is

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] LTSP-4.1.1 now available

2005-04-19 Thread Jim McQuillan
Don, Try again, and see what happens. It could be slowness in the internet or something transient. And, if it still doesn't work, try upgrading your ltsp-utils package. You are using v 0.12, and the current version is v0.14. Although, the one I just tried is v0.12, and it worked fine. Jim McQu

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] LTSP-4.1.1 now available

2005-04-19 Thread Don Robertson
Hi - I have tried to upgrade from 4.1 to 4.1.1 using ltspadmin but get errors: ltspadmin - v0.12LTSP dir: /opt/ltsp Retrieving list of packages from http://www.ltsp.org/ltsp-4.1/...Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_per

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] root directory problem

2005-04-19 Thread Jim McQuillan
Ben, What you are seeing is EXACTLY what is supposed to happen. You are using the ltsp terminal as a TERMINAL, to get a session on the server. You see exactly what everybody else sees on that server. The thin client is using /opt/ltsp/i386 for its own purposes of running the Xserver, but you ar

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] LTSP-4.1.1 now available

2005-04-19 Thread Eric Thibodeau
Hey everyone, this looks like quite an update... one thing though, I had some bad experience with the Composite Extension turned on (some apps quite simply won't start or some browser plugins don't like it). This was about 2 months ago, so things might have changed, anyone else have experienced

[Ltsp-discuss] root directory problem

2005-04-19 Thread Ben lemasurier
Hey everyone, I have LTSP 4.1 up and running on RHEL 4. I am able to log in on the thin client and everything. The problem is that, the root directory is the same as the server, it is not mounted as "/ is equal to /opt/ltsp/i386" instead, users get the exact same results as if they were on the se

[Ltsp-discuss] LTSP-4.1.1 now available

2005-04-19 Thread Jim McQuillan
Hello all, I'm happy to announce that LTSP-4.1.1 is now available. Lots of enhancements and bug fixes to make you all happy. Take a look at the announcement at: http://www.LTSP.org/ltsp-4.1.1.html for more info. You'll also be happy to know that the LTSP packages are now being served up by a RE

[Ltsp-discuss] /home & autofs

2005-04-19 Thread Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
Dears,I installed autofs.When i start it,It made /home as a mount point.Even i have manipulated /etc/auto.master that it make /opt/ltsp/i386/home as a mount point.But it make /home & my mount point too.So it make 2 mount point. Please help me --

[Ltsp-discuss] symbiont?

2005-04-19 Thread tyson
Hi- I just set up a symbiont server that uses dhcp and ltsp. I just have a queston about setting up monitors for the clients. I have a MicroTouch touchscreen that I want to use for a client, but I can't get it to run correctly. I set up the normal configuration drivers for the the touc

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] /tmp permissions wrong?

2005-04-19 Thread Jim McQuillan
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, John Horne wrote: > On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 09:28 -0400, Jim McQuillan wrote: > > > > The fact that /tmp is 755 is simply an oversight. It's not being set to > > anything in particular, so it is defaulting to 755. > > > Okay, but if we did run LTSP with X and had different us

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] /tmp permissions wrong?

2005-04-19 Thread John Horne
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 09:28 -0400, Jim McQuillan wrote: > > The fact that /tmp is 755 is simply an oversight. It's not being set to > anything in particular, so it is defaulting to 755. > Okay, but if we did run LTSP with X and had different users logging in, then they wouldn't be able to write t

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] /tmp permissions wrong?

2005-04-19 Thread Jim McQuillan
John, The fact that /tmp is 755 is simply an oversight. It's not being set to anything in particular, so it is defaulting to 755. One thing that worries me though is that you are using LTSP-4.1, but you are mentioning files and configs that were from LTSP-3. The rc.local script has been replace

[Ltsp-discuss] /tmp permissions wrong?

2005-04-19 Thread John Horne
Hello, Running LTSP 4.1, I have noticed that /tmp gets mounted with the permissions 755 (rwxr-xr-x) and owned by root. This means that any other user cannot write into /tmp (which is what happened and why I am now querying it.) I could simply 'chmod' the directory in my rc.local, but I am confused

[Ltsp-discuss] LTSP4 & Suse 9.1

2005-04-19 Thread Tom Knowles
After a recent devastating fire I migrated from RH9 + LTSP3 + Dell to Suse 9.1 and LTSP4 on a twin Xeon IBM server. However , on this latter setup the X stuff (Open Office in particular) is relatively clunky and printing (in particular ksnapshot) is rather slow. Is anyone aware of any factor in thi

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] gray screen - 10.0.0.0 lan problem ?

2005-04-19 Thread Luciano Tolomei
i have none of the possible problem described in the wiki. so i really does not know where i have to look. i will try installing gdm... Alle 20:24, lunedì 18 aprile 2005, hai scritto: > n the wiki..wiki.ltsp.org > > > Luciano -- Luciano pgpy79RJJpwU5.pgp Description: PGP signature