Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Virualization

2005-04-20 Thread Keir Vaughan-Taylor
You are at the right place with LTSP. You set up accounts for each of your users on a server witht he desktop items that you would like each user to have easy access to. After installing LTSP your users can log into their own account and the user desptop appropriate to them appears as though lo

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Virualization

2005-04-20 Thread bob greatguy
Well...yes, you can do what "they" are asking. You'll also have to add the actual thin client device in which you plug your keyboard, mouse, and display. datacenter? Must have a lot of users. How? Go to ltsp.org and wiki.ltsp.org. Download 4.1.1 bob On 4/20/05, Abubakar . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Ltsp-discuss] Virualization

2005-04-20 Thread Abubakar .
hi! plz let me explain the scenario first We are intending to build a Data Center. A part of this Data center is that - they want their end-users to have, so called, thin clients, i.e. they should have only keyboard mouse and a dispplay on their desks - all the data, applications, Operating sys

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] A safe path for upgrade to 4.1.1

2005-04-20 Thread Verner Kjærsgaard
Onsdag den 20. april 2005 21:01 skrev Verner Kjærsgaard: > Onsdag den 20. april 2005 20:39 skrev Richard Bos: > > Op woensdag 20 april 2005 20:28, schreef Verner Kjærsgaard: > > > - I've got a couple of 4.1 installations in production setups. So I'm a > > > little reluctant to just upgrading for th

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] A safe path for upgrade to 4.1.1

2005-04-20 Thread Verner Kjærsgaard
Onsdag den 20. april 2005 20:39 skrev Richard Bos: > Op woensdag 20 april 2005 20:28, schreef Verner Kjærsgaard: > > - I've got a couple of 4.1 installations in production setups. So I'm a > > little reluctant to just upgrading for the upgrade alone. Why fix > > something that isn't broken :-) > >

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] A safe path for upgrade to 4.1.1

2005-04-20 Thread Richard Bos
Op woensdag 20 april 2005 20:28, schreef Verner Kjærsgaard: > - I've got a couple of 4.1 installations in production setups. So I'm a > little reluctant to just upgrading for the upgrade alone. Why fix something > that isn't broken :-) I know your feeling ;) > But, the auto-USB thing is a real ni

[Ltsp-discuss] A safe path for upgrade to 4.1.1

2005-04-20 Thread Verner Kjærsgaard
Hi List, - I've got a couple of 4.1 installations in production setups. So I'm a little reluctant to just upgrading for the upgrade alone. Why fix something that isn't broken :-) But, the auto-USB thing is a real nice-to-have... So a safe path would that not be: a) No clients on the server b)

[Ltsp-discuss] Ltsp-4.1.1 dhcpd fail with kernel 2.6.9

2005-04-20 Thread Atenea
Hi, we´ve updated from Ltsp 4.1 to 4.1.1 With Kernel 2.4.26-ltsp-3 works fine, but not with 2.6.9 (dhcpd failed - kernel panic) Any idea? Thanks Oscar --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. Version 11 adds new functio

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] LTSP and proprietary graphics drivers?

2005-04-20 Thread Pål Arne Hoff
Gaston Velez wrote: > Hi: > To me your post is quite interesting and I want to make > some questions, because I have developed a similar configuration but it > did not work good in my environment. > 1) My environment, HP t5515 with 128 MB ram, TransMeta Crusoe 800 MHz > with NVIDIA Qua

[Ltsp-discuss] Sound

2005-04-20 Thread Ben lemasurier
Hey everyone, I am having some trouble getting sound to work. I have followed the Wiki (http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/Sound) and installed ltsp-sound. I don't seem to be getting anywhere though. When I boot the terminal, esd starts, the modules are loaded - everything seems to go ok. Bu

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Awk available?

2005-04-20 Thread John Horne
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:17 -0400, Jim McQuillan wrote: > > Awk wasn't a part of Busybox 0.60, and sure enough, it is part of bb > 1.0. > Thanks for the reply, and sorry about this, but I'm answering myself. I found that by downloading the original awk.c and incorporating it into busybox 0.60.4 (

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] Awk available?

2005-04-20 Thread Jim McQuillan
John, Awk wasn't a part of Busybox 0.60, and sure enough, it is part of bb 1.0. The problem is, BB 1.0 is vastly different from 0.60. They've created an elaborate build system for BB 1.0, and i've not had the time to figure out how to integrate that into our own elaborate build system (LBE). As

[Ltsp-discuss] Awk available?

2005-04-20 Thread John Horne
Hello, Running TLSP 4.1 I have been asked if the 'awk' command can be made available. I see that in busybox version 1 awk is present. I have tried installing the awk.c file, and modfying the build process to deal with it, but the file is obviously dependant on busybox version 1 (the build fails re

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] LTSP-4.1.1 now available

2005-04-20 Thread Jim McQuillan
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Emiliano 'AlberT' Gabrielli wrote: > On 04:10, mercoledì 20 aprile 2005, Jim McQuillan wrote: > > Don, > > > > Try again, and see what happens. It could be slowness in the internet > > or something transient. > > > > And, if it still doesn't work, try upgrading your ltsp-ut

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] Please help me.I have a sample question...........

2005-04-20 Thread Wyman, Dale (RMV)
I apologize for not including the fact that we are using Evolution 2.4 Dale Wyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wyman, Dale (RMV) Sent: Wednesday April 20, 2005 7:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ltsp-discuss@lists.sourcef

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] Please help me.I have a sample question...........

2005-04-20 Thread Wyman, Dale (RMV)
Can anyone assist me with an Evolution (Exchange connector) problem. I am running LTSP 4.1 on Redhat, Fedora Core 3. I have tried everything I can think of to get the exchange connector configured to connect to our Exchange server. I constantly get either cannot connect to exchange server, a bac

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] LTSP-4.1.1 now available

2005-04-20 Thread Emiliano 'AlberT' Gabrielli
On 04:10, mercoledì 20 aprile 2005, Jim McQuillan wrote: > Don, > > Try again, and see what happens. It could be slowness in the internet > or something transient. > > And, if it still doesn't work, try upgrading your ltsp-utils package. > You are using v 0.12, and the current version is v0.14. >

[Ltsp-discuss] IBM Netvista again

2005-04-20 Thread Marcus Purper
Hello list, I'm using some IBM Netvista 2800 as clients. I discovered, that only the 2.4.19 kernel is working, newer kernels can't be loaded. I've got the kernel from an pxeutils package. My problem is, that I haven't the the drivers to place them in the /ltsp/i386/etc/lib/modules directory. Is t

[Ltsp-discuss] Please help me.I have a sample question...........

2005-04-20 Thread Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
Dears, I installed ltsp & NIS server & client on one machine. I can boot from client & login from X. I have copied /lib/* to /opt/ltsp/i386/lib Also i have copied /usr/lib/* to /opt/ltsp/i386/lib I have copied following script to a file : HOST=`echo $DISPLAY | awk -F: '{ print $1 }'` rsh ${HOST} /