Hi Jim,
* Jim McQuillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [19.02.2007]:
> Edit your /etc/hosts file, and remove the '.ltsp' from all of the
> workstation entries.
i changed the hosts entries from
192.168.1.40tc1.my.domain.tld tc1
to
192.168.1.40tc1 tc1
and that did the tr
Stephan,
Edit your /etc/hosts file, and remove the '.ltsp' from all of the
workstation entries.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i am trying to get local dev support up and running. My problem is, that
> the hostname of the client differs on client and in $DIS
Hi,
i am trying to get local dev support up and running. My problem is, that
the hostname of the client differs on client and in $DISPLAY. In the
shell at the client 'hostname' returns the hostname without the domain
suffix. In $DISPLAY the domain suffix is included.
I use dnsmasq as dhcp server.
I have 2 weird issues with my fresh edubuntu ltsp setup.
1) I can't make the greeter work. I set the pretty greeter that I
installed as the default remote greeter and even made the change to
gdm.conf manually (setting the RemoteGreeter variable to be the same as
the Greeter variable). I get i
Well, progamatically there isn't much wrong from the "Linux as your OS"
perspective. I think the other areas of objections are in implementation and
support for "small" scale (<10 units) installs:
1) Thin clients aren't much cheaper than full systems and require
significant
servers.
Hi.
I have been using LTSP 4.2 on Ubuntu dapper for a while. I have
created my own debian/ubuntu packages that install LTSP 4.2/tftp/local
devices support:
http://archive.skolesys.dk/testing/pool/main/skolesys-ltsp_4.2-2-skolesys1_i386.deb
http://archive.skolesys.dk/testing/pool/main/skolesys-lts
Lack of infrastructure? If you don't have a solid network set up with
basic services like DHCP and name service running,
maybe LTSP isn't the right solution. If you don't have the IT support
staff to maintain it and those services, maybe LTSP
isn't the right solution. The low level of technical k
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:48:12 -, Ben Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What I have so far is:
>
> Reason against using it for a particular user are:
> * Particular legacy applications need supporting
> * Very high performance multimedia tasks are being undertaken such as
> # live mu
Hi all,
I am writing a best pratice document around LTSP. I am having trouble with the
section on situations where LTSP is inappropriate. I have been advocating it
for so long I can't really see and disadvantages in most situations, and many I
could have sighted are removed using LTSP-5.0.
Wha
