I was pretty 'up' on LTSP 4. I remember a great deal of messing with
it at Lee Lumber of Chicago, for example. I even used it to turn Ace
Hardware onto LTSP.
But now I've loaded LTSP5. Wow.
The process is blindlingly easy. SO EASY, it's hard, if you've done
it before. :) The cu
On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 09:02, Erick Tyack wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know people have asked in the past about blanking the screen on a
> Jammin 125. Jim McQuillan happened to bump into Keith Packard (xfree86
> guru) and Keith suggested turning on DPMS -- how simple. Well low and
> behold it worked!
>
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:00:39 -0500 (EST), Julius Szelagiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Brian,
> your wish has been granted by k12osn. Eric's cd set installs
> flawlessly, without fuss, and works like a charm. it uses rh 7.3 or 8
> (still beta, but really good) and supports just about an
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:22:54 -0500 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Brian,
>
> The problem you are having with the blank screen in X windows is
> exactly the same problem, whether you are dealing with LTSP 2.x
> or LTSP 3.x. This is a Server issue with your display manager.
> it makes no differ
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 21:29:35 +0800 (WST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Brian
>
> I utterly conceed your opinion to you , but I totally dis-agree.
> I've installed LTSP on literly 100's servers from old-isa to latest MBs.
> It has never been so easy as it is now. I use PXEstuff to boot all PXE
>
On 17 Dec 2002 15:24:09 -0500, Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed the rpm's on RH8.0 and it worked.
>
> What is the problem anyway?
I spent a great deal of time getting a network-bootable card to come up...even
after I read the FAQ. Then I eventually dumped it, using instead a
I'm a big believer in LTSP; when I installed 2.x it was fast, simple and light.
But I've made two, seperate, multi-week install attempts on 3.x and have yet to see an
X login screen. And trying to debug it, even after knowing how to do it before, was
darned near impossible.
This is n
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 23:19:56 -0800, John N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> know that certain subscribers to this list distrust tigerdirect.com but
> take a look at this
>
>
>http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?sku=h27-1176%20p&SRCCODE=WEM39300
Well, this NO en
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:26:52 +0100 (MET), Julian Wieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have on one Terminal a error message when i start opera. The Message said
> Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on ...
>
> Can somebody help me?
"GLX" is a means of running spiffy, OpenGL stuff over a network.
On 26 Nov 2002 09:31:36 -0600, "Baeseman, Clifford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[snipped]
> The last line in the inittab is set as follows...
> x:5:respawn:/usr/X11R6/bin/X -query your.terminal.server
>
> We have found this to be the easiest possible way to install client
> machines. It eliminat
Here's another collection. Sorry, but it was *this* one that called it's product
a 'thin client' by name...
http://www.flatpanels.com/GraphicsClient.html
Brian Fahrländer GNU/Linux Zealot, Conserv
I was looking for a little 'R2' unit to watch the GPS and record it, etc.
Something small with a low power-drain so it could be on at all times. They have some
other things, too...and they're Linux friendly.
They also have a thin-client...kinda reminds me of the one from
DisklessWork
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:34:28 +, Shane Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is anyone interested in some (8) "PCM-4894"'s ?. 8"x5" 586-133's. See
> Aaeon site for details. I have been asked by my ex-employer to find
> homes for them. I also have a bunch of 2" dot matrix led boards and
> modu
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:10:13 -0600 (CST), <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would expect Freeciv (which is probably already installed in the K12LTSP
> install as I think it's included in the default install of Redhat) to work
> just fine in an LTSP environment.
Yeah, just bandwidth-eating. Th
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 01:08:27 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> John,
>
> I tried, but my version of Netscape apparently doesn't like your
>
> Submit
>
> way of defining Submit and Reset buttons. They simply appear as text
> and they don't function. Please take the
>
>
>
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:07:54 +, John McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes please, as long as you can remember enough about it to answer the
> questions :-)
Well, we were using the LTSP 2.x version, sitting on a P2/300 with 128M of RAM.
Networking was single-card; meaning that the t
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:12:23 +, John McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> **Final request - survey closing at the end of the month**
I *used* to run one of these; would my information be helpful?
Brian Fahrländer
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 01:54:44 -0500, Michael Spiceland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a script I can run to recreate the XF86Config without rebooting? I
> make changes then I have to reboot the terminals to get them to remake the
> config files.
How about "init 3;sleep 5;init 5"? Tha
I successfully built an LTSP cluster about two years ago, using LTSP 2.0. I've
tried using the same technology to install *both* 2.0 and 2.something, but have always
managed to get hung up on that change to etherboot ("Must have NIC specified in
Option-129" message.
Well, I'm about to
On Sat, 09 Nov 2002 08:53:21 -0800, John N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And with a bit more memory, this would make a good LTSP server
>
> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?sku=d13
> 6-4016%20p&SRCCODE=WEM374L
Guys, what's the big swinging pocketwatch that
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:44:24 -0800 (PST), mslicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My apology--that specification is truelly a thin client. The Netvistas I
> once considered buying were different.
>
> This $99 deal sounds like a good one.
Well, it's a PC-compatible CPU, memory, power suppl
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:32:11 -0600, "Joey Officer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone attempted to contact say a mall or other public arena to offer a
> Internet Kiosk for sell? I'm recently unemployed and have alteast enough
> history working with integration projects that I would like to of
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 23:09:37 +0100, Martin Herweg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi !
>
> A friend pointed me to
> http://www.lex.com.tw/case-light.htm
>
> Dimension:
> 4.9cm (H) x 22.0cm (W) x 16.5cm (D)
Hey, now that's cool; and it runs on 12V, too. I wonder if there's a way to stack
I don't want to go into this on this list since it's SO far off-topic...but you
guys are chocked full of info...
I'm having trouble attaching files to a SquirrelMail 'webmail' system. I've gone
over the FAQ and did a google search, and no help. I'm getting:
[Thu Oct 31 18:16:10 2002
On 25 Oct 2002 14:14:13 +0200, Daniel £a¶ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am network administrator of Main Library of Opole University. We are
> going to use LTSP in our library. Definitely. We even bought 2 servers
> for this and 12 dedicated terminals. Yes we want to use one account for
>
On 24 Oct 2002 01:17:42 -0600, Tom Lisjac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have my own schema for LDAP, that stores the login, name, password
> > and mail directory. If the home dir already exists, adding pam_ldap to
> > the auth entry of /etc/pam.d/system-auth allows a login, but I think
On 23 Oct 2002 15:22:28 -0400, Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could any one on this list give me some tips on connecting to sco from
> linux and get all the function keys to work?
>
> I don't have any access to the sco box, so what I have to do is all on
> the linux client side. From windows
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 14:04:41 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dieter Kroemer) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there a way, to use true type fonts with the X-Fontserver or is it
> possible to use the xfstt (or simillar) - soffice is using truetypes, and I
> can only use 14 fonts on the client - at the server I ca
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 22:54:22 -0400, Patrick Rea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are starting to see an awful lot of spam for a managed list. Has someone
> craked the database?
This thing's probably running BSD for all I know...but if you want to kill spam
(AND I DO...) use SpamAssassin. T
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 18:57:44 -0400 (EDT), Julius Szelagiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Brian,
> think via eden board and casetronic case. 12V power supply.
> haven't fried it yet in my van where voltage varies between 10.6V and
> 16.3V. total cost as an ltsp terminal: $181 + delivery. i
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 17:31:19 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Brian,
>
> Very interesting adventure that you are embarking on.
Yeah, I had the choice between being known as 'that guy that used to be married to
Linda" or something elseand I researched all the dreams I once had, an
I'm getting to the point I might be able to afford/jury-rig a single LTSP
workstation. It's part of a whole project I'm working on.
I'm getting my gear together to spend the rest of my life from the road- parking
wherever business convenience dictates, and sometimes where asthetics dic
On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 23:19:29 -0700, "Charles N. Burns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are the benefits of setting up a font server over, well, not
> setting one up?
If yours is a standalone machine, there's little need for a font server. But if
you have more than one, you only have to
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:42:47 +0200, Hans Ekbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 09:32:05AM +0200, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:46:05AM +0100, Mikkel C. Simonsen wrote:
> > > Is it possible to run two X-sessions simultaniously on some terminals?
> >
> >
On Thu, 03 Oct 2002 09:46:45 +0800, Stephen Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:01 AM 10/3/2002 +0200, Linux Autrement wrote:
> >On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 17:47, Stephen Liu wrote:
> >
> > > If prevention is remote, can a track record of all emails and webmail
> > > dispatched by users be kept in
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:38:18 -0500, "Bhaskar S. Manda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi, people!
> > We need your help now and fast (if possible), please!
> > We are testing the LTSP and an error was find.
> >
> > That is it: Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 01:00
> > The lines
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 23:04:38 -0400, Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure whether this is a bug or a feature, or an unavoidable side
> effect.
[snipped]
> So is access like this to EVERYTHING on a LTSP client's hard drive
> intentional, or an unavoidable situation? (I can't b
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:56:54 +0530, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> to extend the flame ;):
> it is true that putting several partitions makes it more secure, but will be
> a headache if you run out of space on one partition. So, why not use LVM? -
> I've come along a perl-script (one ye
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 09:25:40 +0200, Evgeny Limarenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's see. If your /tmp filesystem is getting full...
[Snipped: summation of an age old problem.]
> With the /home it's the same story...
[Ditto]
> It's not just my speculations, it's my expirience. I've been w
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 09:46:47 +0800, Stephen Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
>
> Thanks for your advice.
>
> One further question
>
> I suppose "/home, /opt, /u, /data, etc" in separate partitions, not one
> big partition. If I am wrong please correct me. If in such an arrangemen
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 17:43:12 -0400, "Jason Bechtel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snipped]
> >> I guess you could use the HDs for that and for swap. I
> >> don't understand what you're asking with regard to "the
> >> best way" though. Do you want details of how to set it all
> >> up? As far as
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 18:07:01 +0200 (CEST), Alessandro Selli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Il giorno Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Evgeny Limarenko così ha scritto:
>
[snipped]
> |/boot should be of small size like 32Mb. Swap can be big enough,
> |something like twice an amount of RAM. The rest is for /.
>
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:28:54 -0500, "Jason A. Pattie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I know this is slightly off the wall, but 28 40GB hard drives aren't
> going to fit in a single server machine. Why not leave them in the
> clients, inform the users that they can never turn their computers off
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:01:10 +0100, "Stephen Berry"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know of an Xserver for the Macintosh that will allow me to use
> my LTSP server on a Mac? I have Xmanager for the PC but do not know of
> anything for the Mac.
I'd also be interested in hea
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 07:54:14 -0500 (COT), "John Karns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would think that it would make sense, as mdk is an rh derivative. I've
> no idea how much it may have distanced itself from rh though.
I wouldn't use Mandrake for a high-profile LTSP application.
I've
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 16:56:57 +0200, "Adrian Snyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 July 2002 16:04, Jeff Roberts wrote:
> > I came to ltsp from a citrix/windows terminal server setup. With ssh, vnc,
> > the citrix ICA client for linux and some creativity we have a much more
> > relia
On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:41:04 +0200, "Anselm Martin Hoffmeister"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There seems to be something like a Java API for the iButton devices, with
> Linux support announced. Try to get your apps run with that, with the
> iButton reader device hanging at the server serial port
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:10:22 +0200 (CEST), "Alessandro Selli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> |That's odd; I'm on a stock kernel; it works here. You *are* trying this as
>root,
> | right? It might be a stupid question, but I have to ask...
> |
>
> It could be that the drive in use is in
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:48:41 +0200, "Alain Vaslet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's odd; I'm on a stock kernel; it works here. You
> > *are* trying this as root, right? It might be a stupid
> > question, but I have to ask...
>
> I have no login at the beginning of LTSP, but I think
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:32:40 +0200, "Alain Vaslet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIK, it has to be compiled in kernel. I'm using hdparm (-d1 /dev/hda)
> to enable DMA support on my hard disk drive. It says this:
>
> HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
>
> I searched the web for this a
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:56:42 -0700, "John Holbrook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did a quick search on freshmeat for Point of Sale and came up
> with 7 projects -
> http://freshmeat.net/search/?q=point+of+sale§ion=projects
>
> There's also an open source accounting project called Nola.
> There's
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:07:20 -0500 (CDT), "Jeff Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am interested in this also. Do anyone know of a mailing-list or project
> already devoted to this? Or does anyone want to start one? I have been
> messing around with something a lot more simplified than this
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:34:15 -0400, "Hal Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have LTSP working fine, but I've run into a problem with NFS.
Before we get to far afield, I thought I'd throw in something you should know.
"Native" NFS anyway, including Redhat Linux from 6.2, has an unwritte
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 00:33:41 +1200, "Kerry Herbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Make sure, at some point that the owner of this machine goes past the "Font
Deuglification Howto". That'll help clean up the fonts and complete the job. Just
look for "font deuglification" on google; it's probab
Am I the only one noticing how motherboards nowdays seem to die without any
recourse? I've gone for years without having to ever throw away a motherboard, but
now I have two of them. This happened on two motherboards with that "always on"
technology where you have to literally pull the p
On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 00:18:10 +0800, "fsswyjz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
ICK! HTML mail AND a mention of the reason we're all here, all in the same
message!
Get this man some holy water, quick!
:)
Brian
Just about everyone who's ever seen the Font Deuglification Howto at
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/FDU has enjoyed it a lot. It makes X SO MUCH BETTER
it's wonderful.
But the only problem I have with TrueType fonts is the content; either you have
nice, gorgeous fonts that scale perfe
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 04:54:49 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi.
> FIRST: I am new to the list and perhaps some local settings are wrong
> (although I don't think so) - but - can someone please tell me why - whenever
> I press r (for reply in kmail) I would reply directly to the recipient
> i
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 17:52:54 -0500, "Luis Abraham Ponce García." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi to everyone in this list, I have some questions on LTSP, I made
> a complete Internet Cafe using a LTSP server with a 1 Ght processor
> and 192 Mb in RAM, there are only 8 terminals (333 MHz and 12
On 28 Jun 2002 09:58:36 +1000, "Derek Zoolander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian, what version of Flash and Galeon are you using? Have you tried it
> on Mozilla?
>
Nope, just Galeon. I like the simple, modular way Galeon works. And in about 6
months of use, it's never broken one me ON
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 19:31:17 -0400, "Tom Allison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone heard of any progress with the Mozilla Browser and Flash?
>
> If it didn't crash, I would have a house full of converts and more.
> A lot of my kids schools are using flash-based websites on the
> internet
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 21:19:04 +0100, "Shane Kennedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This was sent as part of a request for help. In fact, we are probably
> going to revert to netboot shortly, as the clients are going to be
> VIA-Mini-ITX boards. i.e. Fat clients as opposed to thin clients.
Re
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:08:33 -0400, "Charles Marcus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > But before you get worried about running out of network
> > resources, have an independant network specialist put his
> > troubleshooting gear on the net. 100-base-T is apparently a
> > single bad connection
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 10:37:00 -0400, "Charles Marcus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Last year our school added a ltsp server to our pre-existing
> > Linux network. There were around 20 workstations on the ltsp
> > server. It worked well, until all 20 machines were being
> > used at the same ti
On 25 Jun 2002 11:58:37 +1000, "Derek Zoolander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking around for software to monitor the network, any
> recommendations?
Well, for realtime, visual (simpler) stuff, I like trafshow. Under X you can
stretch it vertically to be able to see more traffic.
On 24 Jun 2002 20:05:46 +1000, "Derek Zoolander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should I assume from the lack of replies, apart from some ebay pointers
> to bargains, that nobody is using the LTSP for anything other than home
> use.
HELL no. Isn't the City of Largo, Florida running a big one?
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 12:29:46 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Michel,
>
> Are you talking about using X windows, or do you just
> want a char telnet session ?
>
> If you don't want X, then you just need to set
> RUNLEVEL = 4
> and take a look at the lts.conf.readme file for the other
> p
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 12:02:18 -0400, "Michel Donais" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to place a script so that when a user login in bash
> it is immediately telnet to an SCO server.
>
> Where do I place this script and what do I have to modify to
> to get it work in LTSP
>
>
> This script
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 00:36:52 -0400, "Brent Hasty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using xdm and or kdm how does one go about configuring custom login
> backgrounds, to replace the hounds tooth that seems to be default for the
> login screen on the ltsp clients (workstations)?
Well, *GDM* has
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 16:50:46 -0500, "Phillips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian, how do you "work out the RSA" to work on an lts. It would be very
> helpfull.
You didn't get my last message with the howtos? I looked up the references
myself! Look for "rsa" and "ssh" and take a look at'
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 12:28:26 +0800, "Stephen Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did try removing the bootable floppy and inserted another floppy. But I was
> not allowed to mount the floppy.
Yeah, when you "mount /dev/floppy", you're actually mounting the server's floppy.
It's an odd pers
On Sat, 08 Jun 2002 09:08:09 +0800, "Stephen Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All Guys,
>
> I am trying to find a way to save clients' works by themselves other than
> stored in the Terminal Server nor getting them printed. The workstation is
> booted by floppy and I am not allowed to mou
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 22:20:35 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That cruft you are seeing is SourceForge's way of paying for the
> equipment and bandwidth that they give to us for free.
>
> But, I hate it as much as anybody.
Come July, I'll have a server to dedicate to this purpose. An
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 17:14:35 -0400 (EDT), "R P Herrold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, R P Herrold wrote:
>
> > -- Russ Herrold
>
> Hey -- I did not add all that cruft at the bottom. Is it
> really necessary to add the following lines of advert to every
> message?
>
> >
> >
On Tue, 04 Jun 2002 15:58:04 -0500 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I never used any 486's in production but I did find in testing that some
> of the older video cards with small amounts of memory (like what
> usually came with a 486) seemed to be a problem when dealing with graphics
> and fo
On Tue, 04 Jun 2002 19:23:09 +0530, "Mandar Deodhar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running LTSP thin clients in conjuction with my windows network.
> Now my linux users want to access some shares on windows network.
> Basically they want an interface like the Network Neighbourhood in windows
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 08:28:28 +1000, "Katsonis, Dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > 8086's are still usefull machines and I would hate to see any thrown out.
> > I have no dought that an 8086, even with 640K or less of ram would make a
> > tireless and efficient text terminal. They are acta
On Sun, 02 Jun 2002 04:59:09 -0500, "Rock s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running a 1.1 gigz dell with redhat 7.3. I got the dhcp running and
> tftp running. I got the client to get the ip addy and it starts to hook up
> then it just sits there no screen is coming up. I have alot of tra
On Thu, 30 May 2002 23:48:47 +0200, "Hans Ekbrand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'll partially agree with that, but there still isn't a desktop app where
> > the Linux version is better than the Windows version.
>
> There are many reasonable definitions on "better" that make that
> statement
On Tue, 28 May 2002 19:25:35 -0400 (EDT), "Julius Szelagiewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> John,
> the company i'm working for is not exactly what you are looking
> for, but it is pretty darn close. 9 locations, not 10, wholesale, not
> finance, and not switched but in the process of swi
On Tue, 28 May 2002 16:08:31 -0700, "John Holbrook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anybody have any information on some real world, multiple
> location, switching from the M$ world, real world examples of
> companies switching 100% to the LTSP?
>
> How they overcame problems and challenges, e
On Tue, 28 May 2002 22:49:37 +0800 (WST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> I need to communicate with my ltsp terminals (independant of the display)
>
>[ server -> ws : cash draw open, switch VirtualTerms etc]
>[ ws -> server : start_ws must launch the app on the server]
>
> The ltsp-
On Sun, 27 May 2001 18:08:53 -0400, "Michel Donais" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AT LAST!!
>
> I succeded to get a case for the Eden motheboard at a fair price;
> 90.00 $can. with the motherboard and 62meg pc-133 sdram it comes
> to 295.00 $can approximatly $ 178.00usd
Cool; I'm happy for
On Sat, 25 May 2002 09:06:31 -0400, "Michel Donais" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] Re: Via Eden motherboard/cpu systemsAny .net
>
> I found that case that perfectly suit for the Eden board.
> http://www.casetronic.com/Product/PCcase/2677/CS-2677.html
>
> This case get it's
On Fri, 24 May 2002 21:14:43 +0100, "Shane Kennedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Fahrlander wrote:
> >
> > A few years ago I went to great lengths to find a *good* Wyse60 termi=
> > nal emulator to mesh Linux to SCO applications. Did anyone e
A few years ago I went to great lengths to find a *good* Wyse60 termi=
nal emulator to mesh Linux to SCO applications. Did anyone ever develop =
one? (Function keys included?)
Brian Fahrländer Linux Ze
On Tue, 21 May 2002 16:37:56 -0400 (EDT), "Jim Wildman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Several reasons come to mind all based around the need for segregation
> of traffic.
> 1) DHCP. If I'm already running dhcp in the wider network, placing my
> terminals on a separate network allows me to do the p
On Tue, 21 May 2002 10:31:42 +0200, "Hans Ekbrand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't understand why this would be of benefit; having two seperate lines
>might buy some bandwidth, but it must be a real pain in physically wiring the place.
>Besides- I would thing the internet traffic (0
On Mon, 20 May 2002 19:26:38 -0700, "Sheilafel Vida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i am just amazed and wondering, how will the server and workstations realize that
>there are two lan cards? that one is connected to the ltsp set-up and the other to
>the internet.
It's no big trick; one LAN
On Mon, 20 May 2002 18:14:14 -0700, "Richard Camp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> May I suggest taking a look at the K12LTSP project. This project uses
> Red Hat and LTSP. Everything has already been set up to work with a
> server with 2 network cards.
I don't understand why this would be
On Mon, 20 May 2002 03:41:17 -0700, "Sheilafel Vida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey! Thanks a lot guys. We finally got our workstations running in graphical mode :)
GoodOnYa! I know the feeling very well!
> However, we are to run Netscape in our workstations for them to be able to conne
On Sun, 19 May 2002 19:01:37 -0400, "Brent Hasty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In our cad department we are building a terminal server per workgroup to
> reduce administration and equipment costs. each terminal being a celeron 333
> with 256 mb and a decent video card, using copper gigabit nic
On Thu, 16 May 2002 22:39:12 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Skip,
>
> Cool stuff, but I think it loses its meaning when done like
> this. As far as SNMP is concerned, it's just a bunch of text.
Yep, until you try to parse it on the other end...
> I think the right way is to have
On Thu, 16 May 2002 21:14:34 -0400, "Skip Gaede" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian,
>
> You clearly know your SNMP stuff!
Oh, no...I'm just a wanderer bangin' on things until they work. I've been exposed
to SNMP several times and it just never really sank in.
> In going through the EXA
On Thu, 16 May 2002 17:29:18 -0500 (COT), "Roger Moreno Quintero"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cant find pci card
> try option-129 in the kernel options on the DHCPD conf File
>
> i put option option-129 "NIC=3C5x9 IO=0x300" but doesnt work
Ah- I see you got to where I did. Mine's a garde
On Thu, 16 May 2002 16:56:51 -0500 (COT), "Roger Moreno Quintero"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we have a big problem with a 486 workstation,
>
> ---
> vfs: cannot open root device "ram0" or 01:00
> please append a correct "root=" boot option
> ker
b2 none none
access public "" any noauthexact system none none
access local "" any noauthexact allall all
syslocation 1830 Alta Vista Drive, Evansville, IN
syscontact
On Thu, 16 May 2002 15:30:08 +1000, "Gary Hodder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is there any way to stop the time stamps being sent to each client?
> I've tried deleting the clocks on each terminal but that didnt seem to
> help much.
> I'm looking at about 2 mb data flow per minute w
On Wed, 15 May 2002 22:33:30 -0700, "Sheilafel Vida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi, we tried to boot up our workstation at runlevel 5 but it gives the following
>error:
>
> server fatal error:
> no screens found
>
>
> but it runs in runlevel 3. we wonder what is wrong with it.
> thanks.
On Thu, 16 May 2002 09:09:41 +0530 (IST), "Shanmugasundaram Doraisamy"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Readers,
> We have LTSP 3.0 running on Redhat Linux 7.2. The LTSP
> terminals are used for dataentry into a Custom made Hospital management
> package. Our package does not n
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
