On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, Ramon wrote:
Subject : any material on ltsp with ipv6?
Any material on this topic, please reply.
why would one bother ?- the link to LTSP client boxes doesn't
need it - it can be turned up on the LTSP servers as needed
Russ Herrold
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Andy Rabagliati wrote:
On the NFS server, the /home export was in a separate spindle
series (raid-5) from the OS, and from a code content export
for the presentation tier.
Was that a SCSI RAID ?
yes - Dell PERC set as hardware raid-5
I have battled with RAID5, hoping i
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Andy Rabagliati wrote:
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, R P Herrold wrote:
[Tuning the link layout was determined by sampling the
interface statistics]
I am not quite certain where the NFS server is in your setup ?
Is it a single server for the whole network ?
What was the disk
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Daniel Mealha Cabrita wrote:
Now it's me who's curious...
I wonder why did you choose segmenting the ethernet at server side with a
couple of [EMAIL PROTECTED], instead of using a single 1Gbit card and a switch
with 1-2 gigabit ports? You also wanted a QoS effect?
The l
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, DenisG wrote:
I'm just curious: What's the biggest LTSP network you know?
And what's the server(s)?
My largest so far was 200 seats, deployed with a max of 64
active clients per backend LTSP server. Each server further
segmented its down stream client network load, by h
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
However, I've got this scenario.
I already have a running dhcp on 192.168.0.245
And my LTSP server is 192.168.0.254
How do I tell that configuration in dhcpd.conf?
I'm trying this, but not working:
See section 8 of my outline at
http://www.owlriver.com/t
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, djemmy yunus wrote:
> hi all,
> i want to know how many workstations can be connected to one server.
> is there any formula to count the network load ?
No - the question is meaningless without expected usage
pattern information, and even then can, at best, be estimates
only.
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Chris Welsh wrote:
> jef peeraer wrote:
> >3com 3c905CX-TX-M
> >i use them all the time !
> >
> >jef
PXE on 3com NICs requires altering the boot kernel image with
a package, the source of which is not freely available, to my
understanding. Has this changed?
-- Russ Herrold
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Rudolf Rittmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have installed K12LTSP on a Redhat 9.0 , with 2 working test
> workstations. My problem is with configuring my Network Cards
> (3C905CX-TX-M) with MBA. Anybody has ideas on how to make this work.
The 3-com MBA is not really PXE, so far
> > When I try to start DHCPD I got this error
> >
> > # /etc/init.d/dhcpd start
> > Can't bind to dhcp address: Address already in use exiting.
This simply means that an instance of a dhcp server has
_already_ started, and taken the socket for dhcp
[herrold@oldnews herrold]$ grep dhcp /etc/se
On 4 Nov 2002, Tom Lisjac wrote:
> I've got a "how-to" almost ready to release on this subject.
>
> Unfortunately I'm the only one that's performed the configuration
> procedure I describe in the document... so I'd be very interested in
> hearing from anyone who might like to add a second server
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Jason A. Pattie wrote:
> --[PinePGP]--[begin]--
> This would have to be done via a VPN tunnel as SSH only tunnels TCP
> traffic, not UDP. IPSec for Linux is implemented in the FreeS/WAN
> package. You could also try to use CIPE
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Take a look at http://www.LTSP.org/lbe.html for the gory
> details.
Hi Jim -- Would it be possible to run this command on the
build host, and add a link to a copy of 'lbe-rpm-manifest.txt'
on 'lbe' webpage?
rpm -qa --qf '%{name}\t %{version}\t %{
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I've created a little web page about network booting with PXE; see
>
> http://www.kegel.com/linux/pxe.html
>
> If you know of other PXE resources I should be linking to
Nice compilation -- you might add a direct link to the LTSP
diagnostic outline -- it
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, John McCreesh wrote:
>
> > I've noticed a peculiarity after doing the upgrade. After a few
> > sessions, clients hang during tftp and won't boot again - nothing in
> > /var/log/messages or /secure. The only way I've found to clear the
> > problem is to restart xinetd (I'm us
> > The LTSP network is a highly centralized system. All works done by its
> > users must be saved to its Server provided if no local floppy drive
> > installed. Therefore all confidential data can be retained out of the
> > reach by public.
heh ... I guess this keeps the thread within list typ
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Jim Wildman wrote:
> 1) monitor
> 2) backups
> 3) prestaged
> 4) hire (viz. co-optinf jujitsu)
> 5) different root
> 6) Change password
> 7) Firewall
> 8) Complacency is your enemy.
hmmm ... I would add (it might be called part of 8, but lets
make it express):
9) Stud
I spent an hour and a half last week, speaking with the market
positioning/technical input direct report to the CEO of a high
volume engineering and marketing firm of thin units.
Beyond the expected:
- slotted ram, more ram (one can never have too much)
- moderate processor speed boost (to c
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Jim Wildman wrote:
> This should do...
> lspci -v
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Zoilo wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 27 August 2002 18:56, Bill Cavalieri wrote:
> > > Anyone aware of a magical program that would tell me about the pci
> > > devices installed on a computer?
The Red Hat Ra
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Jan Humme wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 July 2002 14:14, R P Herrold wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Jan Humme wrote:
> > > Nope, you can only have one DHCP-server per segment.
> >
> > well --- the LTSP police will not come arrest you, but it may
>
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Jan Humme wrote:
> Nope, you can only have one DHCP-server per segment.
well --- the LTSP police will not come arrest you, but it may
not work as desired -- I have run two DHCP servers on a
segment, and while they do not interact before the ISC version
3, they do not 'fight
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, John McCreesh wrote:
> > We're somewhat married to Exchange -- what are your thoughts on
> > Evolution?
>
> Not a complete plug-in replacement for Outlook - it uses the web access
> interface of Exchange 2000 (which you probably aren't using yet :-).
> Check the small print
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Mark Farey wrote:
> I'm investigating using LTSP for a medical practice, which is a similar
> requirement. You might like to take a look at twiggi for the scheduling and
> groupware. See http://myezserver.com/twiggi.html
fascinating -- a GPL'd variant exists, which solves li
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Robert Maynord wrote:
> It is, of course, easy to simply set up more ltsp servers for clusters
> of workstations, letting the workstations get their dhcp from the
> regular server. The only concern is network traffic. I wonder if it is
> an advantage to have each ltsp se
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Jan Humme wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 June 2002 08:05 pm, R P Herrold wrote:
> > With a dual P-III 650, and a G or ram, switched, a ThinkNIC
> > comes up, worst case in 1 m 52 s (based on much testing)
>
> ??
>
> On my old Pentium 266 MHz, 128 MB
office. If you need guidance, buy some consulting
from a list member if time pressure is present.
-- Russ Herrold
--
end
==
.-- -... ---.. ... -.- -.--
Copyright (C) 2002 R P Herrold
[EMAIL PROTECTED] NIC: RPH5 (US)
My words are not deathless prose,
but they are mine.
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Michel Donais wrote:
> I need to place a script so that when a user login in bash
> it is immediately telnet to an SCO server.
> This script I think should look as:
> -
> telnet 192.168.0.200
> -
>
> but If I want more like:
>
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> Il giorno Sat, 22 Jun 2002, R P Herrold così ha scritto:
>
> |> The Dell and Compaq quad xeons are out there for under $200 on
> |
> |oops --- $2000, of course ...
>
> OH NO!
>
> I just ordered a score of th
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002, R P Herrold wrote:
> yes -- Dell 2450 with dual 650 through (i forget ...) --
> The Dell and Compaq quad xeons are out there for under $200 on
> ebay
oops --- $2000, of course ...
---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGee
On 22 Jun 2002, Derek Zoolander wrote:
> The time has come to build a Server with a much more powerful CPU
> perhaps even two CPU's. Is anyone using Dual CPU's, what mainboard are
> you using, CPU type, kernel etc. I know some people are using the 2.2
yes -- Dell 2450 with dual 650 through (i fo
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Ken Barber wrote:
> The User Private Groups (UPG) scheme is unique to Red Hat, and IMO is a bit
> ridiculous. I've never used them.
>
> It has been my practice to create groups that actually do something useful,
> such as "faculty", "students", "finaid" and so on.
and a
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> though, is local serial/usb support for cameras and palm
> pilots, things of that nature. I welcome any assitance on
> that project still to come...
>
> Hope something I wrote here helps someone, if not, sorry
> for babbling.
Nicely said -- I appr
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In the past, some people have suggested just copying the
> servers /etc/passwd file to /opt/ltsp/i386/etc, but I can
> tell you very clearly that will NEVER be part of a
> standard LTSP package.
Beyond the obvious 'least privilege argument' in not re
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, R P Herrold wrote:
> -- Russ Herrold
Hey -- I did not add all that cruft at the bottom. Is it
really necessary to add the following lines of advert to every
message?
>
> ___
>
> Don't miss
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Is anyone else willing to put their money where their mouth is?
>
> I am willing to pledge $100 U.S. towards this goal. Imho, this is the only
> thing LTSP lacks to, as Jason, said, make LTSP the Citrix/WinTSE killer...
>
> What do you say, Frank?
D
35 matches
Mail list logo
