h, I see. I never edited the rc.setupx file, I'll have a look. Too
bad the vncviewer's F8 functionality isn't working, or you could have
session persistence.
>
> Tom Schouteden ::
> > On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 11:37, Andres Toomsalu wrote:
> >
> >>I've
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 11:37, Andres Toomsalu wrote:
> I've got it working. At least on some terminals.
> You should have ltsp_x_core-3.0.4 installed (XFree 4.2.99) and I used
> vnc.so-4.2.0.1 + xf4vnc 4.2.0 drivers. There are some drivers still
> missing and some don't work as expected but you ca
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 12:43, Rob Keeling wrote:
> > Tom Schouteden wrote:
> > > Has anyone tried this: http://xf4vnc.sourceforge.net/ or
> >
> > yes
>
> Just had a look at the website, this sounds exactly like what I want to be
> able to do, I want to
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 20:14, Ingo Bruell wrote:
> > I've installed LTSP 3 on an Red Hat 8.0 machine and upgraded it
> > afterwards to Red Hat 9 with XD2. I'm not experiencing any problems
> > you're mentioning.
>
> i want to upgrade from RH 8 to RH 9, too. Have you just installed RH 9
> as upgra
Has anyone tried this: http://xf4vnc.sourceforge.net/ or
http://www.pcxperience.org/thinclientdevel.html in order to achieve
session persistence? i've been playing around with these things for a
while but unsuccessful so far.
any pointers, suggestions or ideas would be welcome
tnx
tom
--
I've installed LTSP 3 on an Red Hat 8.0 machine and upgraded it
afterwards to Red Hat 9 with XD2. I'm not experiencing any problems
you're mentioning.
just my 2c
tom
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 14:28, Matthew McCarty wrote:
> Here is an interesting problem.
>
> I have a RedHat 8.0 K12LTSP machine an
Hi
Does anyone have an idea of the memory footprint differences between
Galeon and Phoenix? Wich one is better/faster for an LTSP environment?
regards
tom
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants:
Hi
I've recently installed an LTSP on RedHat 9. I'm using Via Eden based
"thin clients" with PXE booting, which in turn boot Etherboot to boot an
LTSP kernel. The onboard NIC on the Via's are Realtek's 8139.
When I boot the thin client over a crossover link everything is working
just fine. How
give it the .gz extension now)
>
> Sorry not too descriptive bit I'm sure you'll figure it out.
>
> Best regards,
> Jacob Hoopes
>
>
> On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 09:13, Tom Schouteden wrote:
> > Has anyone succesfully used the Realtek RTL8100B chips
Has anyone succesfully used the Realtek RTL8100B chipset for PXE
booting? I didn't find an image for it at the rom-o-matic website.
Perhaps it works fine with the RTL8139 image?
any feedback would be appreciated
tnx
tom
---
This SF.net ema
Hi
I was wondering if, with all the discussions about light-weight window
managers going on, anyone has already tried using Gnome in a working
environment. I mean 10+ clients, working concurrently. I'd be
interested in hearing some results, experiences.
thanks
tom
---
et
> screwed up". With the word "font" omitted. It's really wierd and only
> mildly annoying. :) Any ideas?
>
> -Gadi
>
> On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 09:21, Tom Schouteden wrote:
> > I have the exact same problem. I've tried using several different
&
-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
> For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
--
Tom Schouteden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linugen - linux business solutions
-
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 23:02, Dieter Kroemer wrote:
> I want to buy a tft-display, but I don't know, if there are any
> problems if I use it with ltsp?
> Does anybody works with a ltsp-client _and_ a tft-display?
I'm using ltsp in a test environment with a TFT display and it works
perfectly. If y
Being on this list I learned that the somewhat standard window manager
for use with LTSP is either iceWM or qvwm. I also noticed that most
people are using Phoenix as a web browser and sylpheed or evolution as
email client. I am curious to know what you are using as a file
manager, seeing that no
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 06:08, Vice P. Jandusay wrote:
> I am new in LTSP, and find the installation
> straight forward. I have installed everything
> DHCP, NFS, TFTP and of course LTSP. The server
> works fine, and I think everything in it. I am
> using 3c509b NIC in my workstation and server. I
> h
;t scale
for more than 2 servers, which is a shame really because the setup is
very straightforward.
tom
> -----Original Message-
> From: Tom Schouteden
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 1/29/03 12:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp capacity on server
>
> What abo
> On Wednesday 29 January 2003 16:23, Jake Schroeder wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:04:30PM +0100, Tom Schouteden wrote:
> > > hi, does anyone here have a modeline example for TFT screens? on the
> > > clients my screen looks like it has vertical "blurry f
hi, does anyone here have a modeline example for TFT screens? on the
clients my screen looks like it has vertical "blurry fields". there
appear to be some (imaginary) vertical columns below which the fonts
look more blurred/aliased than those next to them. i think this may be
caused by a wrong mod
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 18:05, Rick Gatewood wrote:
> If the pre-release news I have been reading is correct, 3.1 is supposed to be
> lighter and more efficient. That would be a nice present for everyone, if
> true.
i would love to hear some feedback from people who actually used it,
especially in
What about setting up let's say 3 modestly configured servers (1GB) each
and load balance between the 3? It offers you better redundancy and
cheaper disks. If it is possible to load balance ltsp though.
tom
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 17:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, that's reasonable. But even
Is there anyone who can help me out with this?
Should I try installing xfs? I remember hearing that xfs cannot cope
with a large amount of users (>~40)?
Any info would be welcome
tnx
tom
-Forwarded Message-
From: Tom Schouteden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subje
hi
I'm having a little problem with font spacing on the clients. It looks
like there's a space behind every letter. I'm not seeing this on the
ltsp system itself. How can I avoid this without having to enable xfs?
I'm currently using -*-helvetica-medium-r-normal-*-12-*-*-*-*-*-*-*- but
I've had
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 14:02, Mike Eggleston wrote:
> Does anyone have any recomendations on how to strip ltsp
> to its minimum for running as the os on a cluster's nodes? The
> applications and support data for the cluster processing
> I will have on nfs mounts. I see a stripped down ltsp as having
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 17:52, Julius Szelagiewicz wrote:
> Matthew,
> the best Eden board would be the fastest :-)
> Via mini-itx come in 2 flavors: eden and c3. eden uses fanless
> processor, c3 is faster but with fan. via eden 500 is just about perfect,
> because it is cool enough to r
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 14:04, Dan Scannell wrote:
> Tom,
>
> Im wondering if you experiencing a problem that I had a while back, it used
> to hang for about 15 seconds while booting Gnome. It only seemed to occur
> under Metacity rather than XFCE.
Dan, it's not really hanging .. it's just kinda s
> For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
>
>
>
> ---
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _
NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _
> Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
> https://
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 09:32, Peter Childs wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Dan Scannell wrote:
>
> > Regarding bloatware, what do people actually mean when they refer to this,
> > is it the number of bundled applications that come with the WM/DM or the
> > actual memory footprint of the overall basic
ve of Pete, find a good Unix-style WM that is fast,
> unbloated, simple, and working. Users will have a better time of it.
working on it.
tom
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 12:04:14PM +0100, Tom Schouteden wrote:
> > True, I installed it an hour ago and it took me some time to get it
&
True, I installed it an hour ago and it took me some time to get it
properly into GDM. It looks like XP (without the Luna interface) but is
even worse to work with. Nothing really works, except the Run menu.
If you want something like XP, get the real thing (yeah I know, you
don't want it, but y
31 matches
Mail list logo
