Sudev Barar wrote:
On 07/04/06, matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to start out by saying that I'm new to the list and haven't
looked into this much yet, but I plan on setting up a server for home
use shortly. One of the things I would like to do if possible is to
disconnect a session, bu
On 07/04/06, matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> I want to start out by saying that I'm new to the list and haven't
> looked into this much yet, but I plan on setting up a server for home
> use shortly. One of the things I would like to do if possible is to
> disconnect a session, but allow any
Gideon Romm wrote:
Bob-
This is actually more of a question for the display manager that you use
than it is for LTSP. A straight X connection is stateless, and
therefore lacks the capability to do session migration (ala Windows
Terminal Services). BUT, X is also modular and powerful, which mea
Bob-
This is actually more of a question for the display manager that you use
than it is for LTSP. A straight X connection is stateless, and
therefore lacks the capability to do session migration (ala Windows
Terminal Services). BUT, X is also modular and powerful, which means
that it can be mad
I've started testing 4.2 and so far it works great! Great job -- you
know who you are.
I've seen recent and past threads talking about logging in from more
than one terminal. I use to do this but now I kill a user's processes
when he/she logs in and out. This solved some problems I was having
but
