Re: [Ltsp-discuss] High Availablity LTSP

2005-02-28 Thread Dan Stromberg
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 14:30 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If you want to make it even more bullet-proof you could have two such > > servers, and link them together using RAID-1 over enbd > > (enbd.sourceforge.net). So you run a network raid-1 over a physical > > raid-5. You must only mount th

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] High Availablity LTSP

2005-02-28 Thread Dan Stromberg
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 14:30 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If you want to make it even more bullet-proof you could have two such > > servers, and link them together using RAID-1 over enbd > > (enbd.sourceforge.net). So you run a network raid-1 over a physical > > raid-5. You must only mount th

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] High Availablity LTSP

2005-02-26 Thread christoph
> If you want to make it even more bullet-proof you could have two such > servers, and link them together using RAID-1 over enbd > (enbd.sourceforge.net). So you run a network raid-1 over a physical > raid-5. You must only mount the filesystem on one server at the time, > but the other one could s

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] High Availablity LTSP

2005-02-23 Thread Daniel Hedblom
Hello! Have anyone tried this and was it successful? Is it hard to manage etc? I saw this tonight and became interested but is it something we mere mortals can pull off with a sacrificed chicken and some luck? /cheers! Citerar Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 2005-22-02 at 0

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] High Availablity LTSP

2005-02-23 Thread Tom Lisjac
> On Tue, 2005-22-02 at 07:55 +, Peter Childs wrote: > > I would like to get a second server and be able to have everything > > on both machines so that should one fail the other one can take over > > even if we lose a few thin clients that need resetting to bring them back. Another approa

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] High Availablity LTSP

2005-02-23 Thread Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
On Tue, 2005-22-02 at 07:55 +, Peter Childs wrote: > I would like to get a second server and be able to have everything > on both machines so that should one fail the other one can take over > even if we lose a few thin clients that need resetting to bring them back. Setup a cluster. It

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] High Availablity LTSP

2005-02-22 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
Nothing to do with LTSP really, but...: > Currently we have 1 main server provinding files on Raid (5) running > LTSP. It serves the files via NFS If you want to make it even more bullet-proof you could have two such servers, and link them together using RAID-1 over enbd (enbd.sourceforge.ne

[Ltsp-discuss] High Availablity LTSP

2005-02-21 Thread Peter Childs
We have about 30 Thin Clients (ST320/Jammin) running LTSP. We run a 24x7 operation and hence need 24x7 operation from our computer system. We are still in the progress of transfering from a 12 year old DPS6 mini-computer to a Linux, based system. Currently we have 1 main server provindi