On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 04:33:39PM +0200, Robert Schuettler wrote:
> I finally got around to put together the "Perfect Thin-Client" poll
> results.
So if we take it apart, here are the most important features (more than half
of the participants selected these):
> 98% (42) | network bootabl
Hi everybody,
I finally got around to put together the "Perfect Thin-Client" poll
results.
--
% (Votes) | Feature
+-
98% (42) | network bootable
8
Thanks to all those who participate/d!
Here's one last call, and I'll try to sum up the results by the end of the
week...
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:52:07PM +0200, Robert Schuettler wrote:
> Client these days. To make this a bit more fun and efficient, there's a
> Doodle poll at:
>
> http://d
Hi Robert
I just added a comment with your doodle, but then realized, it might be
better to post a bit more along with this comment here:
A decent audio card is also important
An integrated linux-compatible webcam would be a nice feature
and an integrated VOIP-adapter with RJ11-port to be able to
The only option that I really want in a thin client that is missing from
your poll is POE support. I'd love not to have to plug these little
buggers in at the source. I can run lam many places I don't run power.
On 06/11/2010 06:52 AM, Robert Schuettler wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Noise? Speed?
Hi everyone,
Noise? Speed? Price? Features? (...)
I'd be interested to know what most people would want in a "perfect" Thin
Client these days. To make this a bit more fun and efficient, there's a
Doodle poll at:
http://doodle.com/mqhdchrg59ishmfb
If you have time, take a look and select wh
