Hello Anselm,
> BTW busybox has advantages too regarding the binary size - not
> needing all those fat utilities in a 16M RAM client is probably worth
> some pain.
Oh, that's for sure. Unless, as stated earlier, you
want or [sigh] have to (mis)use LTS as "instant Linux"
or something.
Thanks for
Serge Tiunov wrote:
> Check the binary that you're running. I went through this a while
> back and all of these pointed to the "busybox" executable, which
> wouldn't shutdown the client when called to do so.
Oops. I should have figured!
Busybox also segfaults for no readily apparent reason afte
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Tom Griffing wrote:
> Serge;
>
> Check the binary that you're running. I went through
> this a while back and all of these pointed to the
> "busybox" executable, which wouldn't shutdown the
> client when called to do so.
Oops. I should have figured!
Busybox also segfaults
Serge;
Check the binary that you're running. I went through
this a while back and all of these pointed to the
"busybox" executable, which wouldn't shutdown the
client when called to do so.
My solution was to copy "/sbin/halt" to the /opt/ltsp/i386/sbin
directory and create the symbolic link for
