Hello,
I encounter a recurrent problem with LTSP (thin client on debian jessie,
ltsp-server version 5.5.8). When a user moves the scroll bar too fast in
whatever program it is (text editor, web browser, etc) he is
disconnected from the thin client and looses his session and thus any
unsaved work.
Sorry for late answer.
Le 23/02/2015 13:19, Alkis Georgopoulos a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> try:
> poweroff
> read -p "The system will now power off..." dummy
Nah, no effect, the thin client do the poweroff and throws me Squashfs
error messages before dying...
Although it's not "nice" to let a thin clie
Hi,
try:
poweroff
read -p "The system will now power off..." dummy
On 20/02/2015 08:01 μμ, Pierre Yann Baco wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> I'm writing a bash shell script to be executed on a LTSP 5.x client
> (once copied in /opt/ltsp/amd6/usr/share/screen.d + ltsp-update-image.
>
> The script (started as
Hi All!
I'm writing a bash shell script to be executed on a LTSP 5.x client
(once copied in /opt/ltsp/amd6/usr/share/screen.d + ltsp-update-image.
The script (started as a SCREEN_O2=srv_launch in lts.conf) starts and
execute correctly (backup local mbr/gpt/partitions of windows/linux
station t
Hello,
Have you logged into X with this other account on the server? It is
possible that $HOME directory for this account misses .dmrc file which
specifies X session to be invoked at login. In case this file is missing
try to copy *.dmrc* from the original account (that works in thinclient).
--
My thin client is booting fine from my LTSP server and I have created
a new user in my server. Now the problem is that i am unable to login
into the thin client with the new user but it works fine with the
original user, that is logged in when I boot the thin client.
What can be the possible issue
Hello, all.
I know for many of you, September marks the end of summer and
beginning of a new year, and though Spring is usually for cleaning, we
have chosen to make some room now.
So, I have a partial list of odds and ends that may be of interest to
someone on this list. I know many folks here ma
Στις 07-10-2010, ημέρα Πεμ, και ώρα 14:07 +0200, ο/η guyonne έγραψε:
> But how can this happened, when it was working correctly with ubuntu
> 8.04 ?
Can you somehow boot it with 8.04 and paste the xorg.conf that's used
there, so that we see the exact modeline (timings)?
> Yes and in 1024x768 reso
Στις 07-10-2010, ημέρα Πεμ, και ώρα 14:12 +0200, ο/η rolf έγραψε:
> I just want to point out that maybe the problem is with Ubuntu 10.04,
> not LTSP.
> When i try to use 1024x768 my screen goes black and the system hangs.
And your system doesn't hang when you use another monitor?!
Because AFAIK th
Le 07/10/2010 12:50, Alkis Georgopoulos a écrit :
> Στις 07-10-2010, ημέρα Πεμ, και ώρα 12:26 +0200, ο/η guyonne έγραψε:
>> Hi
>>
>> If I try xrandr --output default --mode 1024x768
>> I get nothing when I switch with Alt+Ctrl+F7
>>
>> here it is the result of the xrandr command
>>
>> Screen 0: min
hi,
I just want to point out that maybe the problem is with Ubuntu 10.04,
not LTSP.
When i try to use 1024x768 my screen goes black and the system hangs.
I had to stay with Ubuntu 9.10, where some of my monitors (10) are
'recognized' at a higher resolution, but it is still possible to change
it.
Στις 07-10-2010, ημέρα Πεμ, και ώρα 12:26 +0200, ο/η guyonne έγραψε:
> Hi
>
> If I try xrandr --output default --mode 1024x768
> I get nothing when I switch with Alt+Ctrl+F7
>
> here it is the result of the xrandr command
>
> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1024 x 768, maximum 1024 x 768
>
Le 07/10/2010 09:55, Alkis Georgopoulos a écrit :
> Στις 07-10-2010, ημέρα Πεμ, και ώρα 09:16 +0200, ο/η guyonne έγραψε:
>> I'm trying to set a 1024x768 resolution, but your solution
>> doesn't change anything.
>
> You mean it did change something, it turned off the screen (presumably
> because the
Στις 07-10-2010, ημέρα Πεμ, και ώρα 09:16 +0200, ο/η guyonne έγραψε:
> I'm trying to set a 1024x768 resolution, but your solution
> doesn't change anything.
You mean it did change something, it turned off the screen (presumably
because the timings were too high) instead of giving you 800x600, righ
Le 07/10/2010 03:48, james a écrit :
> On Wednesday 06 October 2010 22:23:32 ltsp-discuss-
> requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> My setup was working with ubuntu 8.04, since I switch to ubuntu 10.04
> one of my thin-client work only with 800x600 resolution (resolution I
> should set
I'm trying to set a 1024x768 resolution, but your solution
doesn't change anything.
The thin-client boot, ubuntu load and when the monitor turn off then on
for the ldm screen, it's turn off and not on. I can switch to a console
but I don't have access to the GUI.
Thanks
Le 06/10/2010 21:03, Alki
On Wednesday 06 October 2010 22:23:32 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> >>> My setup was working with ubuntu 8.04, since I switch to ubuntu 10.04
> >>> one of my thin-client work only with 800x600 resolution (resolution I
> >>> should set in the lts.conf with this:
> >>> [MAC ADR
What resolution are you trying to set?
X_HORZSYNC=30.0-55.0 is too low, for 1024x768 try the following in
lts.conf:
[Default/or client mac address]
X_HORZSYNC=30.0-88.0
X_VERTREFRESH=50.0-65.0
XRANDR_MODE_0=1024x768
Στις 06-10-2010, ημέρα Τετ, και ώρα 20:25 +0200, ο/η guyonne έγραψε:
> @Zs
@Zsolt : my monitor seems to support 54 kHz HSYNC, so I've tried :
X_HORZSYNC = 30-55 and X_HORZSYNC="30-55" and X_HORZSYNC=30.0-55.0
but no one works (I've always the same Xorg.7.log file).
I've tried XSERVER=vesa too, but with no much result
@Gadi : no changement
Thanks
Le 06/10/2010 15:2
Le 06/10/2010 10:52, SZABO Zsolt a écrit :
> > On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Guyonne wrote:
> >
My setup was working with ubuntu 8.04, since I switch to ubuntu 10.04
one of my thin-client work only with 800x600 resolution (resolution I
should set in the lts.conf with this:
Le 06/10/2010 15:21, Gideon Romm a écrit :
> > Guys,
> >
> > If you are having video problems on a newer distro, always make sure
> > compiz is disabled on the server first. 9 times out of 10, it is the
> > source of the problem. You can disable it on the server with this:
> >
> > if compiz is gi
Le 06/10/2010 10:52, SZABO Zsolt a écrit :
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Guyonne wrote:
>
My setup was working with ubuntu 8.04, since I switch to ubuntu 10.04
one of my thin-client work only with 800x600 resolution (resolution I
should set in the lts.conf with this:
[MAC ADRESS]
Le 06/10/2010 15:21, Gideon Romm a écrit :
> Guys,
>
> If you are having video problems on a newer distro, always make sure
> compiz is disabled on the server first. 9 times out of 10, it is the
> source of the problem. You can disable it on the server with this:
>
> if compiz is giving you probl
Le 06/10/2010 15:21, Gideon Romm a écrit :
> Guys,
>
> If you are having video problems on a newer distro, always make sure
> compiz is disabled on the server first. 9 times out of 10, it is the
> source of the problem. You can disable it on the server with this:
>
> if compiz is giving you probl
Le 06/10/2010 10:52, SZABO Zsolt a écrit :
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Guyonne wrote:
>
My setup was working with ubuntu 8.04, since I switch to ubuntu 10.04
one of my thin-client work only with 800x600 resolution (resolution I
should set in the lts.conf with this:
[MAC ADRESS]
Le 06/10/2010 10:52, SZABO Zsolt a écrit :
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Guyonne wrote:
>
My setup was working with ubuntu 8.04, since I switch to ubuntu 10.04
one of my thin-client work only with 800x600 resolution (resolution I
should set in the lts.conf with this:
[MAC ADRESS]
Guys,
If you are having video problems on a newer distro, always make sure
compiz is disabled on the server first. 9 times out of 10, it is the
source of the problem. You can disable it on the server with this:
if compiz is giving you problems, one way to disable it for all users
is: sudo gconft
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, SZABO Zsolt wrote:
> and some lines before:
> (II) SAVAGE(0): : Using hsync range of 31.47-53.67 kHz
> (II) SAVAGE(0): : Using vrefresh range of 43.48-87.85 Hz
>
> Try to define a wider HSYNC range explicitly in lts.conf (if you are SURE
> that your monitor supports it, e.g.: 3
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Guyonne wrote:
>>> My setup was working with ubuntu 8.04, since I switch to ubuntu 10.04
>>> one of my thin-client work only with 800x600 resolution (resolution I
>>> should set in the lts.conf with this:
>>> [MAC ADRESS]
>>> X_MODE_0 = 800x600
>>>
>>> This happen only wit
Le 03/10/2010 15:53, Jakob Unterwurzacher a écrit :
> Am 03.10.2010 15:43, schrieb stef guyonne:
>> Hi
>>
>> My setup was working with ubuntu 8.04, since I switch to ubuntu 10.04
>> one of my thin-client work only with 800x600 resolution (resolution I
>> should set in the lts.conf with this:
>> [MA
Le 03/10/2010 15:53, Jakob Unterwurzacher a écrit :
> Am 03.10.2010 15:43, schrieb stef guyonne:
>> Hi
>>
>> My setup was working with ubuntu 8.04, since I switch to ubuntu 10.04
>> one of my thin-client work only with 800x600 resolution (resolution I
>> should set in the lts.conf with this:
>> [MA
Le 03/10/2010 15:53, Jakob Unterwurzacher a écrit :
> Am 03.10.2010 15:43, schrieb stef guyonne:
>> Hi
>>
>> My setup was working with ubuntu 8.04, since I switch to ubuntu 10.04
>> one of my thin-client work only with 800x600 resolution (resolution I
>> should set in the lts.conf with this:
>> [MA
Le 03/10/2010 15:53, Jakob Unterwurzacher a écrit :
> Am 03.10.2010 15:43, schrieb stef guyonne:
>> Hi
>>
>> My setup was working with ubuntu 8.04, since I switch to ubuntu 10.04
>> one of my thin-client work only with 800x600 resolution (resolution I
>> should set in the lts.conf with this:
>> [MA
Am 03.10.2010 15:43, schrieb stef guyonne:
> Hi
>
> My setup was working with ubuntu 8.04, since I switch to ubuntu 10.04
> one of my thin-client work only with 800x600 resolution (resolution I
> should set in the lts.conf with this:
> [MAC ADRESS]
> X_MODE_0 = 800x600
>
> This happen only wi
Hi
My setup was working with ubuntu 8.04, since I switch to ubuntu 10.04
one of my thin-client work only with 800x600 resolution (resolution I
should set in the lts.conf with this:
[MAC ADRESS]
X_MODE_0 = 800x600
This happen only with one thin-client, the 2 others works correctly
(the 3 machi
Found out that it was the floppy drive setting in the BIOs. Both
computers don't have floppy drives. On the fast booting thin client it
was disabled on the slow computer it was enabled, once I disabled the
floppy drive everything came to life and it stopped seg faulting on
localapps as well.
I've got two identical thin clients, one runs slow whilst the other runs
fast.
The slow running client sometimes has trouble booting over the network.
Both thin clients have hard drives in them but I've configured them to
boot over the network in a diskless fashion. The hard drive can be
rem
Hi,
I'm making some tests with Linux Terminal Server (on Ubuntu) and Alix
as thin client.
Alix1d works correctly, but Alix3d3 freezes during the boot (after to
have download the image).
Do you have any suggestions? It's due to the fact that Alix3d3 has not
PS2 keyboard?
Thank you and Happy New Ye
I think that really depends on what you intend to run as localapp.
>From discussions in #tlsp @ freenode about 512mb if you're going
Firefox(With flash and sound),OpenOffice,iTalc and videos as a minimum.
So more then 512mb.
Just firefox with flash and sound maybe 256 should be ok?
Your thoughts?
> We are planning to deploy an LTSP network with about 32
> clients. We are going to install Firefox+Flash and a media
> player (likely VNC) as local applications, so I'm wondering
> what thin client specs we need in order to handle that flawlessly.
>
>
-
We're having g
Tommaso R. Donnarumma kirjoitti:
> BTW, anybody here has had any experience with Atom-based "nettops" (i.e.
> things like the Asus eee Box or MSI Wind PC) as thin clients? There are
> upcoming models with the Dual-Core Atom 330 and 1 or 2 GB RAM that look
> perfect (on paper) for thin clients with
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 10:59 +, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
> Firefox is a bit of a ram hog at the best of times and it varies hugely.
> The way I (ab)use it involves holding open up to 100 tabs at a time.
> Currently, it's using 500MB of RAM on its own. If people stick to a few
> tabs things w
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Appiah wrote:
> I think that really depends on what you intend to run as localapp.
> From discussions in #tlsp @ freenode about 512mb if you're going
> Firefox(With flash and sound),OpenOffice,iTalc and videos as a minimum.
>
> So more then 512mb.
>
> Just firefox with
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 10:23 +, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
> Presumably the more RAM the better too (within reason). Does anyone have
> an idea of a minimum for a client running local apps? 256MB? 512MB maybe?
> You want to avoid relying on nbd swap if at all possible.
I do hope 512 MB is en
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 12:08 +0200, Asmo Koskinen wrote:
> Tommaso R. Donnarumma kirjoitti:
>
> > We are planning to deploy an LTSP network with about 32 clients. We are
> > going to install Firefox+Flash and a media player (likely VLC) as local
> > applications, so I'm wondering what thin client s
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Asmo Koskinen wrote:
> Most important thing is video card - Intel, NVidia or Ati. Do not waist
> your time with Via or something like that, you need real GPU here.
Presumably the more RAM the better too (within reason). Does anyone have
an idea of a minimum for a clien
>Hi!
>We are planning to deploy an LTSP network with about 32 clients. We are going
>to install
>Firefox+Flash and a media player (likely VNC) as local applications, so I'm
>wondering what thin
>client specs we need in order to handle that flawlessly.
>Digging the docs, I only seem to find
Tommaso R. Donnarumma kirjoitti:
> We are planning to deploy an LTSP network with about 32 clients. We are
> going to install Firefox+Flash and a media player (likely VLC) as local
> applications, so I'm wondering what thin client specs we need in order
> to handle that flawlessly.
Good/best full
Hi!
We are planning to deploy an LTSP network with about 32 clients. We are
going to install Firefox+Flash and a media player (likely VNC) as local
applications, so I'm wondering what thin client specs we need in order
to handle that flawlessly.
Digging the docs, I only seem to find guidelines fo
On October 16th, we updated some cups packages on one of our 64-bit
Hardy Heron servers, and libcupsys2 in the thin client image.
Unfortunately, I believe this broke printing to thin clients. Port 9100
is no longer available on the clients, and cups times out with "Network
host 'ws0-005' is busy;
I have a netcafe with 4 thin clients running of a Kubuntu LTSP server. We
have them autologin based on mac address of the machines. So each mac
address is associated with a particular user but it's easy for the admin to
change and disable the autologin when troubleshooting with settings in
/var/lib
2008/6/20 Shrenik Bhura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I mean developers or organisations who are active contributors to LTSP and
> are also selling hardware for the same.
It is not a must that the developers also sell hardware. I have run
LTSP installations for 6(?) years now and have been involved in
ad
Sudev Barar wrote:
> 2008/6/19 Shrenik Bhura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Following a similar sentiment can anyone tell me of real contributors to
>> LTSP from India (anyone around may put their hands up ;-) ) or around
>> from where shipment shall be visible to Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
>>
2008/6/19 Shrenik Bhura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Following a similar sentiment can anyone tell me of real contributors to
> LTSP from India (anyone around may put their hands up ;-) ) or around
> from where shipment shall be visible to Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
??? Can you be more clear Shrenik?
Chris Roberts wrote:
> On Thursday 19 Jun 2008, Rob Owens wrote:
>
>> I usually look first to the companies who contribute software to LTSP,
>> like www.disklessworkstations.com and www.thesymbiont.com
>>
>> I have a few SYM1112 units from www.thesymbiont.com and I like them.
>>
>
> diskle
On Thursday 19 Jun 2008, Rob Owens wrote:
> I usually look first to the companies who contribute software to LTSP,
> like www.disklessworkstations.com and www.thesymbiont.com
>
> I have a few SYM1112 units from www.thesymbiont.com and I like them.
disklessworkstations would have been my first sugg
I usually look first to the companies who contribute software to LTSP,
like www.disklessworkstations.com and www.thesymbiont.com
I have a few SYM1112 units from www.thesymbiont.com and I like them.
-Rob
Sean Carte wrote:
> Does anybody have recommendations regarding thin client hardware for
> t
Ojdrej:
Which casting did you use for your Via Epia Ex-series boards?
Sichendra
On 6/18/08, Ondrej Valousek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have couple of Via Epia EX boards that I have fairly satisfied with.
> They are:
> - quiet, fanless and very small
> - reasonably priced
> - DVI output for
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:53:28 +0200
Sean Carte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see HP offer a few, including the NeoWare range. Has anybody used
> these with LTSP?
I use Neoware Capio 600-series terminals and they work fine with LTSP 4.2. I
haven't tried them with LTSP 5, though.
You can find the
We have couple of Via Epia EX boards that I have fairly satisfied with.
They are:
- quiet, fanless and very small
- reasonably priced
- DVI output for sharp picture
- with the binary video driver from Via also superior X performance
Ondrej
Chris Roberts wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 Jun 2008, Sean Car
On Wednesday 18 Jun 2008, Sean Carte wrote:
> Does anybody have recommendations regarding thin client hardware for
> the clients?
>
> I see HP offer a few, including the NeoWare range. Has anybody used
> these with LTSP?
We have a couple of HP t5700 series machines, which PXE boot straight into
L
Does anybody have recommendations regarding thin client hardware for
the clients?
I see HP offer a few, including the NeoWare range. Has anybody used
these with LTSP?
Sean
--
Sean Carte
esAL Library Systems Manager
+27 72 898 8775
+27 31 373 2490
fax: 0866741254
http://esal.dut.ac.za/
-
A couple of years ago I bought some really nice eTC-3800 (I think they are
also known as eBox 3800). They have been working like a charm (PXE boot) and
the supplierwere very helpful in substituting one that got lost in the
delivery.
However one died 6 month ago (couldn't power on). Last month
On Feb 11, 2008 4:53 AM, A J MacLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 11 February 2008 03:47:14 Ryan Churches wrote:
> > When you say 'plain old X11' do you mean running 'ssh -X foo
> > /path/to/gui/app/bar' from a standalone workstation or something
> > equivalent?
>
> No, not really - I mea
On Monday 11 February 2008 03:47:14 Ryan Churches wrote:
> When you say 'plain old X11' do you mean running 'ssh -X foo
> /path/to/gui/app/bar' from a standalone workstation or something
> equivalent?
No, not really - I mean XDMCP. With Linux based dedicated thin clients a
Linux server configure
On Feb 9, 2008 7:49 AM, Chris Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 08 February 2008 20:39, Ryan Churches wrote:
> > It would be nice to find a small form factor solution with integrated
> > LCD shipping with Linux
>
> I've looked into this previously but came to the conclusion that it is
Thanks so much for the response.
I was hoping you could clarify some points for me:
On Feb 8, 2008 3:54 PM, AJ MacLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 08 February 2008 20:39:25 Ryan Churches wrote:
> > I have a client with a space and cable clutter problem. He is adding
> > some terminals
On Monday 11 February 2008 05:09:53 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > I tried ebox2300. They work fine (but business graphics, not gee wiz
>
> With what LTSP version did you try it? I tried with both K12LTSP 6.0 and
> CentOS 5 versions and no network card friver could be found-->so kernel
> panic. If
We, Business Data Solutions, are the importers of the eBox range for
South Africa.
The 2300 will be end of Life soon. I t is a great LTSP machine but you
could struggle to get the audio drivers to work properly. The 4300 will
be replacing the 2300. The 4300 has the same casing, but has a 500MHz
> I tried ebox2300. They work fine (but business graphics, not gee wiz
With what LTSP version did you try it? I tried with both K12LTSP 6.0 and
CentOS 5 versions and no network card friver could be found-->so kernel
panic. If I understod manuals correctly the ebox2300 uses a r6040
network adap
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 12:04 -0800,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a client with a space and cable clutter problem. He is adding
> some terminals to run some Java-based software for his practice. The
> app is tested extensively in Linux, and I pointed out we could
> theoretically save money us
On Friday 08 February 2008 20:39, Ryan Churches wrote:
> It would be nice to find a small form factor solution with integrated
> LCD shipping with Linux
I've looked into this previously but came to the conclusion that it is not as
good an idea as it seems. You seem to have to pay double the price
On Friday 08 February 2008 20:39:25 Ryan Churches wrote:
> I have a client with a space and cable clutter problem. He is adding
> some terminals to run some Java-based software for his practice. The
> app is tested extensively in Linux, and I pointed out we could
> theoretically save money using
I have a client with a space and cable clutter problem. He is adding
some terminals to run some Java-based software for his practice. The
app is tested extensively in Linux, and I pointed out we could
theoretically save money using LTSP.
It would be nice to find a small form factor solution with
Bob Wooden kirjoitti:
> I am getting confused. There is (and I think I started it) two
> conversations, here on this list and over on the Edubuntu-users list
> regarding this issue. If it makes any difference, my system is an
> Ubuntu 7.10 (Gutsy) and then I added the LTSP5 packages. It is NO
I am getting confused. There is (and I think I started it) two
conversations, here on this list and over on the Edubuntu-users list
regarding this issue. If it makes any difference, my system is an
Ubuntu 7.10 (Gutsy) and then I added the LTSP5 packages. It is NOT a
Edubuntu 7.10 build. I i
hi,
On Di, 2008-01-29 at 08:34 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
>
> 2) if it's suppose to run in the chroot (when doing an upgrade)
> and something else is causing it to fail (like /proc or /dev/pts not
> being mounted).
its supposed to run in the chroot, the server side script just triggers
the postrm.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:12:26AM -0500, Charles Austin wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2008 10:49 AM, Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 09:43:32AM -0600, Bob Wooden wrote:
> > > I have now followed the "new" InstallX11VncOnLtspClients (listed below)
> > > and they are much b
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 09:43:32AM -0600, Bob Wooden wrote:
> I have been attempting to install x11vnc on our clients. I previously
> followed the "old" InstallX11VncOnLtspClients and got similar errors.
>
> I have now followed the "new" InstallX11VncOnLtspClients (listed below)
> and they are
I have been attempting to install x11vnc on our clients. I previously
followed the "old" InstallX11VncOnLtspClients and got similar errors.
I have now followed the "new" InstallX11VncOnLtspClients (listed below)
and they are much better, thank you. But, I am still receiving the
following erro
Hello,
My ltsp server is on Mandriva2007.1
running LTSP4.2.
I am trying to boot a Gigabyte thin clinet PC, TA series.
I get the following error :
client IP : 192.168.0.110, mask 255.255.255.0
DHCP IP : 192.168.0.245
PXE-E79 : NBP is too big to fit in free base memory.
PXE - MOF : exiting PXE
Hi,
please check the system itself having the network boot rom facility in the
NIC. If it have the boot rom ut will definitly supports PXE booting which
required for LTSP.
Try with VXL TC3831..low cost and you will get better perfomance..
cheers
manoj
On 8/10/07, Max Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Eric Holt wrote:
> When searching for new thin clients (that had serial port support) for a
> new project, it would have been handy to have had a page in the Wiki,
> perchance, that had detailed information.
Like this one? :)
http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/Clients
I've often wondered if it would be really helpful for us to compile a
list of thin clients that we've worked with, and what issues we've had
-- or how successfully we've been able to get them to work with LTSP.
When searching for new thin clients (that had serial port support) for a
new project, i
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 17:10:22 -0600, Max Clark wrote
> Hi all,
>
> I am curious about the support for OEM thin clients (i.e. the HP
> T5135). What is really needed on the client in order to support LTSP,
> how can I validate if this is the case?
>
> I have found a lot of success stories with the HP
Hi all,
I am curious about the support for OEM thin clients (i.e. the HP
T5135). What is really needed on the client in order to support LTSP,
how can I validate if this is the case?
I have found a lot of success stories with the HP 5125 but no mention
of the 5135.
Thanks,
Max
-
Thanks for the reply. It gave me some things to try. I wrote
everything down below, so sorry if it's long. If anyone has any ideas
based on this please let me know.
Thanks!
>
> I haven't tried LTSP on Ubuntu, and the latest release (v7.04) uses LTSP v5
> (I
> think) which is an entirely diff
On Wednesday 20 June 2007 20:25, mopey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having problems with usb thumbdrives being auto-detected. It is
> kind of weird, since all my other local media (floppy, cd, hard drive)
> is detected and I have tested on multiple hardware (completely different
> computers) that are kno
Hi,
I am having problems with usb thumbdrives being auto-detected. It is
kind of weird, since all my other local media (floppy, cd, hard drive)
is detected and I have tested on multiple hardware (completely different
computers) that are known to work.
I have a very vanilla install. In fact, I j
Running Ubuntu 6.10 / LTSP 5. When I turned on local device support,
everything worked perfectly; USB, floppy, CD-ROM, even the local hard
drive on a PC running as a thin client.
The problem is that it works too well. The HP T5125's thin clients that
I use have 32MB of flash memory on it with
Thanks for the info. I'll place an order today.
Jim McQuillan wrote:
> Damien,
>
> Most people are using PXE these days, because so many computers come
> with it built-in. It works great, and for most people, that's the best
> way to go.
>
> At DisklessWorkstations.Com, we offer both PXE and E
Damien,
Most people are using PXE these days, because so many computers come
with it built-in. It works great, and for most people, that's the best
way to go.
At DisklessWorkstations.Com, we offer both PXE and Etherboot, because
some people started out using Etherboot, and they just prefer to
I was about to buy a thin client and a few network cards from
http://www.disklessworkstations.com
I ran into a problem. Some thin clients use PXE and some use Etherboot.
The Ethernet cards have options as well. The AOpen card uses Etherboot.
The Linksys card uses bootp. I'm not sure if bootp is
Cristi Mitrana a écrit :
> On 10/10/06, Christophe Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The thin client stops booting and the screen turns off after the step
>> "building the Xorg configuration files". Everything before seems to be
> [...]
>
> It seems the problem is the X server start
On Thursday 12 October 2006 03:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > The thin client stops booting and the screen turns off after the step
> > "building the Xorg configuration files". Everything before seems to be
>
> [...]
>
> It seems the problem is the X server starting with the wrong parameters.
>
Cristi Mitrana a écrit :
> On 10/10/06, Christophe Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The thin client stops booting and the screen turns off after the step
>> "building the Xorg configuration files". Everything before seems to be
> [...]
>
> It seems the problem is the X server start
On 10/10/06, Christophe Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The thin client stops booting and the screen turns off after the step
> "building the Xorg configuration files". Everything before seems to be
[...]
It seems the problem is the X server starting with the wrong parameters.
Try to
Hello,
The thin client stops booting and the screen turns off after the step
"building the Xorg configuration files". Everything before seems to be
OK, dhcp and tftp are doing there job. The gdm.conf file contains the
two lines:
[Xdmcp]
Enable=true
The same thin client worked
perfectly on Debian
Dear Expert,
Anybody have tried below product on LTSP?
NStation L100
NStation L110
NStation L150
NStation L200
http://www.ncomputing.com/ncomputing/products/typel100.php
Thank you for your information.
--
Best Regards,
Donny Christiaan.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 12:46 -0500, Vern Graner wrote:
> Vern Graner wrote:
> > Does anyone know if Edubuntu/LTSP can work with hardware thin clients
> > (i.e. "Wyse Winterm", "Maxspeed" etc.) and, if so is there a listing of
> > the compatible hardware units? Thanks! :)
We have got wyse winterms
1 - 100 of 258 matches
Mail list logo
