Wilson wrote:
Which one is better? Also, in a LTSP situation would you see any benefits
running Star vs Open Office?
I have OOo 1.1.2 installed in an LTSP pilot. Because OOo can take a
long time to load (relative to Microsoft Office), running OOo in LTSP
actually makes you feel much better
R. Scott Belford wrote:
Thanks, Wayne. It is not mine. I see it more as an endeavor for
*our* tech community. We are getting two responses: one is great, how
can we help, and the other is from the crabs in the bucket.
--scott
Plse see my privat mail. wayne
Hawaii Linux Institute wrote:
This is a great, very ambitious project. However, unless you know
something I don't, I am a little bit concerned as to whether we have the
infrastructure to support such a trans-Pacific conference.
What infrastructure are you referring to?
A more practical
R. Scott Belford wrote:
The Hawaii Open Source Education Foundation (HOSEF) is pleased to
announce that the First annual Trans-Pacific Open Source Software
Conference (TPOSSCON) will be this December at the Hawaii Convention
Center from December 13-17.
This is a great, very ambitious project
Which one is better? Also, in a LTSP situation would you see any benefits
running Star vs Open Office?
Wilson
On Friday 2004-09-03 23:53, Nakashima wrote:
> Hi all,
> I received the following inquiry from a colleague. Can anyone
> provide some guidance?
> --Peter
>
> Linux on old Macs? I did a bit of reading last night and both
> LinuxPPC and Yellow Dog Linux are known to support the 7200s.
> Basically,
