+1 (According to Digy's suggestion)
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Troy Howard wrote:
> All,
>
> Please cast your votes regarding the topic of .Net Framework support.
>
> The question on the table is:
>
> Should Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4 be the last release which supports the
> .Net 2.0 Framewor
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> +1 to getting 2.9.4 ready to roll + the changes to the directory structure we
> have
> going
+1 for 2.9.4 and directory structure.
To make that happen, I'd like to know what needs to be done and in
what way I could be of any help. There
> Am I correct that your trial code changes make this version of Lucene.NET
> incompatible and un-buildable with any version of .NET prior to 4.0?
As I understand it, 2.9.4g only replaces non-generic collections with
generic ones. Generics was introduced in .NET Framework 2.0.
Oh, sorry, I took
Builds fine.
Three failed tests,
Lucene.Net.Index.TestIndexWriterReader.TestDuringAddIndexes and
Lucene.Net.Index.TestIndexWriter.TestFutureCommit and
Lucene.Net.Store.TestWindowsMMap (MMapDirectory does not seem to be
ready for the world yet)
Related: What is the Hudkins status?
On Tue, Apr 5,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13014455#comment-13014455
]
Amanuel Workneh commented on LUCENENET-397:
---
The code on Bitbucket w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13009224#comment-13009224
]
Amanuel Workneh commented on LUCENENET-391:
---
The bitbucket version is a
