On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 05/23/2011 12:31 PM, Manuel de Ferran wrote:
>
>> Greetings lxc-users,
>>
>> I'm running lxc 0.7.4-0ubuntu7 on an ubuntu 11.04 with kernel
>> 2.6.38-8-generic.
>>
>> There is something I don't understand with the lxc.network.hwaddr. I wa
I loled.
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:12 PM, John Soros wrote:
> that's a weird BOOLEAN
>
>
> On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:52:23 +0200
> Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
>> On 05/22/2011 07:27 AM, Marc Haber wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:53:56PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> >> On 05/21/2011 10:11 PM,
that's a weird BOOLEAN
On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:52:23 +0200
Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 05/22/2011 07:27 AM, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:53:56PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 05/21/2011 10:11 PM, Marc Haber wrote:
> >>> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:07:03PM +0200, Daniel L
To have auto-restart of my containers after a host reboot I add a sticky
bit to their configuration file (indeed this does my lxc meta-script) and
on the host I have the init-script:
root@vms2:/lxc# cat /etc/init.d/lxc
#!/bin/sh
#
### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides: lxc
# Required-Start:
On Mon 2011-05-23 (18:22), Roberto wrote:
> http://www.phenona.com/blog/using-lxc-linux-containers-in-amazon-ec2/
>
> Unfortunately, it seems I cannot start a container. In fact, after I
> run the following:
>
> lxc-start -n vm0
>
> I cannot see any login prompt.
lxc-start does not show you a
On Mon 2011-05-23 (21:24), Christoph Mitasch wrote:
> I was just thinking about another test case. The native network
> performance of the host system (not inside the container).
framstag@diaspora:~: fexsend -u vms2 /tmp/2GB.tmp .
Server/User: http://vms2/frams...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de
/tmp/2GB.t
On 05/23/2011 12:31 PM, Manuel de Ferran wrote:
> Greetings lxc-users,
>
> I'm running lxc 0.7.4-0ubuntu7 on an ubuntu 11.04 with kernel
> 2.6.38-8-generic.
>
> There is something I don't understand with the lxc.network.hwaddr. I was
> expecting to have the veth MAC addr set to it, but it appears t
Hi again,
I was just thinking about another test case. The native network
performance of the host system (not inside the container).
Regards,
Christoph
On 05/23/2011 01:32 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
> On Mon 2011-05-23 (13:26), Christoph Mitasch wrote:
>
>> What kind of networking did you use in
Quoting Roberto (prof...@gmail.com):
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new to LXC and I've been following the following instructions on
> how to setup a container:
>
> http://www.phenona.com/blog/using-lxc-linux-containers-in-amazon-ec2/
>
> Unfortunately, it seems I cannot start a container. In fact, after I
>
Hi,
Which 10 gb adapter did you use in the esx box? I have test data on a broadcom
10 gb adapter that shows very poor results in thruput. The problem is that the
chip on the broadcom only pump 25% of the 10 gb when talking to non broadcom
adapters. We have several level 3 calls open regarding t
Hi all,
I'm new to LXC and I've been following the following instructions on
how to setup a container:
http://www.phenona.com/blog/using-lxc-linux-containers-in-amazon-ec2/
Unfortunately, it seems I cannot start a container. In fact, after I
run the following:
lxc-start -n vm0
I cannot see any
On 5/21/2011 7:48 PM, Benjamin Kiessling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Indeed this is not a virtualization specific problem. You want your host to
> operate as a router for
> the other two IP addresses and, depending on the configuration of OVH,
> ARP-Proxy the whole stuff.
> Assuming you want have PUB-IP1 on
Ulli Horlacher wrote:
> A small network application benchmark between LXC and VMware ESX:
>
> ESX:
>
> framstag@diaspora:~: fexsend -i unifex /tmp/2GB.tmp .
> Server/User: http://fex.uni-stuttgart.de/frams...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de
> /tmp/2GB.tmp : 2048 MB in 87 s (24105 kB/s)
>
> LXC:
>
> fra
On Mon 2011-05-23 (13:26), Christoph Mitasch wrote:
> What kind of networking did you use in LXC. Veth?
Yes.
Hardware is an ordinary Dell office PC, whereas the ESX host is a
datacenter grade Fujitsu server. Price difference ca factor 1000 :-)
--
Ullrich Horlacher Server- und Arb
Hello Ulli,
thanks for the interesting numbers.
What kind of networking did you use in LXC. Veth?
Regards,
Christoph
On 05/23/2011 01:22 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
>
> A small network application benchmark between LXC and VMware ESX:
>
>
> ESX:
>
> framstag@diaspora:~: fexsend -i unifex /tm
A small network application benchmark between LXC and VMware ESX:
ESX:
framstag@diaspora:~: fexsend -i unifex /tmp/2GB.tmp .
Server/User: http://fex.uni-stuttgart.de/frams...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de
/tmp/2GB.tmp : 2048 MB in 87 s (24105 kB/s)
LXC:
framstag@diaspora:~: fexsend -i flupp /tmp/2
Greetings lxc-users,
I'm running lxc 0.7.4-0ubuntu7 on an ubuntu 11.04 with kernel
2.6.38-8-generic.
There is something I don't understand with the lxc.network.hwaddr. I was
expecting to have the veth MAC addr set to it, but it appears that is only
setting the vm ethernet.
If we can not use this
Hi all,
i'm going to use LXC as a lightweight instrument to partition a modern equipped
blade server center into discrete, handy units to run a set of business
applications in it. Because it's a "friendly environment", I don't have to
focus on jail security. But I want to use the features of th
18 matches
Mail list logo
