Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Through. Sent from my iPad > On May 3, 2022, at 6:22 AM, Stephen Adolph wrote: > >  > I find myself wondering if the mailing list is now becoming very unreliable. > If this message gets through please respond. > thanks > Steve

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

As John says, sometimes only a few people might have an answer to your question and they may not be reading the list at that very time. There's an option in your list profile to see or not see your own posts; try turning that on if it's off. m - Original Message - From: Peter Volla

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

On 4/5/22 11:18, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: So I tried adding Host: lists.bitchin100.com Type: TXT Value: v=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all It accepted it..

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Looks like you didn't break the list John! On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 1:48 PM John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > On bitchin100.com I have one TXT record > > Host: @ > Type: TXT > Value: v=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include: > relay.mailchannels.net -all > > I have a lists type A record under b

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

it got through On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 5:53 PM Peter Vollan wrote: > I'd appreciate if someone could respond to my messages just so I know they > got through. I have posted about the weird error I am getting with Kurt > McCullum's Mcomm twice without a peep, and I don't want to bore people to > d

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

On bitchin100.com I have one TXT record Host: @ Type: TXT Value: v=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include: relay.mailchannels.net -all I have a lists type A record under bitchin100.com which is the IP address. So I tried adding Host: lists.bitchin100.com Type: TXT Value: v=spf1 mx incl

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

yes On Tue, May 3, 2022, 8:53 PM Peter Vollan wrote: > I'd appreciate if someone could respond to my messages just so I know they > got through. I have posted about the weird error I am getting with Kurt > McCullum's Mcomm twice without a peep, and I don't want to bore people to > death if they

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

I think only one other person actually cc'd Steve in on the reply. If he's having list problems, replying only to the list *probably* isn't going to help. --dt On 4/5/22 07:43, Alastair Wiggins wrote: Received loud and clear here in Australia! Alastair Wiggins

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

There's still the SPF record fix to try: John, tl;dr - copy the SPF TXT record from bitchin100.com to lists.bitchin100.com. Completely unsure if this resolves Google's issue or not, but it will improve the SPF side of things. On 4/5/22 02:00, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: If anyone has a sugge

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Received loud and clear here in Australia! Alastair Wiggins

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 11:55 AM Peter Vollan wrote: > I'd appreciate if someone could respond to my messages just so I know they > got through. I have posted about the weird error I am getting with Kurt > McCullum's Mcomm twice without a peep, and I don't want to bore people to > death if they ha

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

I'd appreciate if someone could respond to my messages just so I know they got through. I have posted about the weird error I am getting with Kurt McCullum's Mcomm twice without a peep, and I don't want to bore people to death if they have already seen it. On Tue, 3 May 2022 at 11:03, Gregory McGi

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

A good way to tell is the discord email list channel, it has 99% of the messages except the ones that exceed 2000 characters.. those are skipped due to limitations on the importer Greg

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

> On May 3, 2022, at 10:02 AM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > You say "messages will look a little different from these users." > Can you talk more about that? Are you talking about mail service software or > people reading the list? End users (us!) will see messages from the list with a From: that

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

You say "messages will look a little different from these users." Can you talk more about that? Are you talking about mail service software or people reading the list? If you think there are any likely side effects to the suggested fixes, pluses and minuses it would be helpful to hear them. Btw,

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

> On May 3, 2022, at 9:30 AM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > If anyone has a suggestion that I can try in Mailman I'll try it. Hi John, In my own opinion the safest thing to do is to sigh and implement one of mailman's two header munging policies: Option A is: set dmarc_mitigate_action to munge_fr

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 12:38 PM John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > > If anyone has a suggestion that I can try in Mailman I'll try it. On the mailman server I used to manage, I had to bite the bullet and enable munge_from https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC -Josh

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

If anyone has a suggestion that I can try in Mailman I'll try it. For what it's worth I think emails are coming through. Seems like some are getting delayed or bouncing for some users. But I haven't personally noticed any gaps in the discussions. -- John. >

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

> On May 3, 2022, at 8:20 AM, Cedric Amand wrote: > > By implementing DMARC records, you know who's trying to send mail "on your > behalf" and I noticed that in the DMARC reports, this mailing list's server > was one of them. This is true for users who control their domain and can manage mail

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Zero percent degredation. From: M100 on behalf of Lloyd Johnson Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 3:57 PM To: m...@bitchin100.com Subject: Re: [M100] is the list actually working? Received by me. From: M100 On Behalf Of Stephen Adolph Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2022

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Received by me. From: M100 On Behalf Of Stephen Adolph Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2022 8:23 AM To: m...@bitchin100.com Subject: [M100] is the list actually working? I find myself wondering if the mailing list is now becoming very unreliable. If this message gets through please respond. thank

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Exactly, Actually DMARC just let's you know what SPF records would already do on their own, but silently. By implementing DMARC records, you know who's trying to send mail "on your behalf" and I noticed that in the DMARC reports, this mailing list's server was one of them. In my case, SPF record

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

> On May 3, 2022, at 7:09 AM, Cedric Amand wrote: > I did not investigate this much ; but I would look at the DMARC and « from » > problems DMARC is definitely one -- potentially the main -- issue here. If someone with a strict DMARC record submits a message to the list for broadcast, many li

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Ok Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > Op 3 mei 2022 om 15:40 heeft Brad Grier het volgende > geschreven: > >  > Got it. > >> On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 7:24 AM incoming wrote: >> received >> >> > On May 3, 2022, at 8:22 AM, Stephen Adolph wrote: >> > >> > I find myself wondering if the mailing list

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

There are multiple things that seem to be weird with the mailing list ; I for example receive DMARC complaints that your domain is sending email with a « from » of my domain ; which is nowadays asking for problems The « reply « field is also weird with multiple times the mailing list name in it

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

5 x 5 From: M100 On Behalf Of Stephen Adolph Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2022 9:23 AM To: m...@bitchin100.com Subject: [M100] is the list actually working? I find myself wondering if the mailing list is now becoming very unreliable. If this message gets through please respond. thanks Steve

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Yep. Got it. I'm using Fastmail, not Gmail. george g. On Tue, May 3, 2022, at 6:22 AM, Stephen Adolph wrote: > I find myself wondering if the mailing list is now becoming very unreliable. > If this message gets through please respond. > thanks > Steve

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Got it. On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 7:24 AM incoming wrote: > received > > > On May 3, 2022, at 8:22 AM, Stephen Adolph wrote: > > > > I find myself wondering if the mailing list is now becoming very > unreliable. > > If this message gets through please respond. > > thanks > > Steve > > -- -- Bra

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

received > On May 3, 2022, at 8:22 AM, Stephen Adolph wrote: > > I find myself wondering if the mailing list is now becoming very unreliable. > If this message gets through please respond. > thanks > Steve

Re: [M100] is the list actually working?

Yep, the list is working and at least I seem to get all of the messages normally (but then again I'm not using Gmail). - kim -- Original Message -- From: "Stephen Adolph" To: m...@bitchin100.com Sent: Tue, 03 May 16:22:32 Subject: [M100] is the list actually working? I find myself w

[M100] is the list actually working?

I find myself wondering if the mailing list is now becoming very unreliable. If this message gets through please respond. thanks Steve