On Wednesday 25 January 2012 16:14:22 Pascal Terjan wrote :
[...]
> Aah I see :)
> You are using the index2.php that I had created as a test and have not
> yet integrated to the main page. It did not get updated to display
> correct information...
Oh, thanks :)
I'll fix it asap (& i need to me
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:47, Balcaen John wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 08:54:49 Pascal Terjan wrote :
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:07, Balcaen John wrote:
>> > On Sunday 22 January 2012 15:51:28 Pascal Terjan wrote :
>> >> I did some minor changes in the build system meaning that "upl
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 15:37:40 Pascal Terjan wrote :
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 15:15, Balcaen John wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 14:45:33 Pascal Terjan wrote :
> > [...]
> >
> >> The .upload (used to decided if we display it as uploaded) was created
> >> 3s after the upload finis
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 15:15, Balcaen John wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 14:45:33 Pascal Terjan wrote :
> [...]
>>
>> The .upload (used to decided if we display it as uploaded) was created
>> 3s after the upload finished (the .youri)
>> Looking at the .youri, it correctly updates the hdli
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 14:45:33 Pascal Terjan wrote :
[...]
>
> The .upload (used to decided if we display it as uploaded) was created
> 3s after the upload finished (the .youri)
> Looking at the .youri, it correctly updates the hdlists (to
> 20120125-132029-synthesis.hdlist.cz) and runs the
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 13:25, Balcaen John wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 07:47:09 Balcaen John wrote :
>> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 08:54:49 Pascal Terjan wrote :
>> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:07, Balcaen John wrote:
>> > > On Sunday 22 January 2012 15:51:28 Pascal Terjan wrote :
>>
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 07:47:09 Balcaen John wrote :
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 08:54:49 Pascal Terjan wrote :
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:07, Balcaen John wrote:
> > > On Sunday 22 January 2012 15:51:28 Pascal Terjan wrote :
> > >> I did some minor changes in the build system meaning
On Wednesday 25 January 2012 08:54:49 Pascal Terjan wrote :
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:07, Balcaen John wrote:
> > On Sunday 22 January 2012 15:51:28 Pascal Terjan wrote :
> >> I did some minor changes in the build system meaning that "uploaded"
> >> now really mean uploaded (the package is guar
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:07, Balcaen John wrote:
> On Sunday 22 January 2012 15:51:28 Pascal Terjan wrote :
>> I did some minor changes in the build system meaning that "uploaded"
>> now really mean uploaded (the package is guaranteed to be in the
>> hdlists), and you can safely submit anything
On Sunday 22 January 2012 15:51:28 Pascal Terjan wrote :
> I did some minor changes in the build system meaning that "uploaded"
> now really mean uploaded (the package is guaranteed to be in the
> hdlists), and you can safely submit anything depending on it.
Hum in fact it seems not « perfect » :/
W dniu 22.01.2012 16:51, Pascal Terjan pisze:
I did some minor changes in the build system meaning that "uploaded"
now really mean uploaded (the package is guaranteed to be in the
hdlists), and you can safely submit anything depending on it.
Perfect!
Thank you!
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 03:51:28PM +, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> I did some minor changes in the build system meaning that "uploaded"
> now really mean uploaded (the package is guaranteed to be in the
> hdlists), and you can safely submit anything depending on it.
Nice!
--
Regards,
Olav
On Sunday 22 January 2012 15:51:28 Pascal Terjan wrote :
> I did some minor changes in the build system meaning that "uploaded"
> now really mean uploaded (the package is guaranteed to be in the
> hdlists), and you can safely submit anything depending on it.
Nice :)
Regards,
--
Balcaen John
Jabb
I did some minor changes in the build system meaning that "uploaded"
now really mean uploaded (the package is guaranteed to be in the
hdlists), and you can safely submit anything depending on it.
14 matches
Mail list logo
