On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Jan 28, 2010, at 12:13 AM, Jake Mannix wrote:
>
> > What do you do when your "svn stat | wc -l" returns "66", and you have
> fixes
> > for 6 of your 7 open bugs? I'd like to check in, but I've also done some
> > local rearranging:
>
>
On Jan 28, 2010, at 12:13 AM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> What do you do when your "svn stat | wc -l" returns "66", and you have fixes
> for 6 of your 7 open bugs? I'd like to check in, but I've also done some
> local rearranging:
Hmmm, my brain can usually only handle one or two fixes at a time! FWI
oooh, holey round-off errors, batman! Quick quiz:
- d = -7.105427357601002E-15
- Math.sqrt(d) == ?
yuck. Something which is no longer particularly close to zero!
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> Okeedokee, trigger fired.
>
> Folks might want to svn up sometime soo
Okeedokee, trigger fired.
Folks might want to svn up sometime soon.
-jake
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Sounds like a good idea to do as a batch.
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Jake Mannix
> wrote:
>
> > Should I go through the trouble of pulling apart all thes
Sounds like a good idea to do as a batch.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> Should I go through the trouble of pulling apart all these checkins, or can
> I just add a wad of new unit tests, and make sure everything passes? Y'all
> trust me? :)
>
--
Ted Dunning, CTO
DeepD
What do you do when your "svn stat | wc -l" returns "66", and you have fixes
for 6 of your 7 open bugs? I'd like to check in, but I've also done some
local rearranging:
colt's got DoubleDoubleFunction, we have BinaryFunction. colt's got
DoubleFunction, we have UnaryFunction. Same exact interfac
