On Saturday 03 March 2007 12:43:53 pm you wrote:
> On 2/23/07, Andrew Straw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2) make our own distutils monkeypatch a la setuptools. Looking at
> > setuptools/dist.py, this doesn't look trivial -- certainly beyond my
> > free bandwidth capacity.
>
> This is fine by me -
On 2/23/07, Andrew Straw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2) make our own distutils monkeypatch a la setuptools. Looking at
> setuptools/dist.py, this doesn't look trivial -- certainly beyond my
> free bandwidth capacity.
This is fine by me -- I actually was forced to think about this this
morning as
On 3/3/07, Jouni K. Seppänen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Done. Should the function signature in the docstring of barh be
> changed as well? I think listing the possible keyword arguments and
> their defaults is valuable in the help text, but the signature could
> make people think they can use po
"John Hunter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I replaced most of the kwargs by a **kwargs dict in svn revision 3037.
>
> Since this changes the API, albeit minimally, make sure these changes
> are documented in the API_CHANGES file. Thanks for working on this.
Done. Should the function signature
On 3/3/07, Jouni K. Seppänen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I replaced most of the kwargs by a **kwargs dict in svn revision 3037.
> This does change the behavior for people who were giving positional
> arguments to barh, but they do get an error message.
Since this changes the API, albeit minimall
