Hello everyone,
I just committed some accelerator-related updates to the WXAgg
backend. I have fixed the problem with the way I was calling the
wxBitmap constructor in _wxagg.src. More importantly, I written
another set of the agg-to-wx.Bitmap conversion routines that uses the
new Bitmap
On 2/21/07, Jouni K. Seppänen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Have you had time to look at my patch regarding the PDF backend? :-)
>
> A bit, and I couldn't quite get it to work. But what the heck, let's
> put it in the repository so we can all hack on it. It is quite an
> improvement to the backend
Thanks Ken!!
> More importantly, I written
> another set of the agg-to-wx.Bitmap conversion routines that uses the
> new BitmapFromBufferRGBA() function in wxPython 2.8.
Are these in Python or c++?
> The blit()
> routine also got a bit faster after I realized it was more efficient
> to j
I noticed today that setup.py is using package_data. Is this absolutely
necessary? The most recent version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux includes
python-2.3, which does not support package_data. We are still supporting
python-2.3, aren't we?
Darren
--
On Feb 22, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
>
>> More importantly, I written another set of the agg-to-wx.Bitmap
>> conversion routines that uses the new BitmapFromBufferRGBA()
>> function in wxPython 2.8.
>
> Are these in Python or c++?
Since BitmapFromBuffer() and its aforemention
Ken McIvor wrote:
>> Are these in Python or c++?
>
> Since BitmapFromBuffer() and its aforementioned cousin are covered in
> the wxWidgets documentation for wxBitmap, I believe they're mostly in C++.
umm, I meant, is YOUR code in Python or C++, but it looks like you
answered that below:
>> um
FYI Christopher, et al. - Due to operator incompetence the changes I
blabbed about earlier haven't hit the repository yet.
Ken
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and y
On Feb 22, 2007, at 5:17 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
>
> I had written some "smarts" for setup.py (and utilities it uses) to
> do a better job of finding the correct wx-config. Is there any
> point to that now? If so, I'll sent it along to you.
Debian stable is going to be released soon with
Darren Dale wrote:
> I noticed today that setup.py is using package_data. Is this absolutely
> necessary? The most recent version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux includes
> python-2.3, which does not support package_data. We are still supporting
> python-2.3, aren't we?
Yes, I am sure that is the i
