Re: [PING] was Re: [PATCH] Dynamically load XOpenDisplay,XQueryPointer and XCloseDisplay (2nd try)

2003-02-23 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! > Now -lext2fs should follow. I guess it is used way less than -lX11... Yes. And gpm too. Dependency on gpm is bad in particular, because it makes mc depend on S-Lang and ncurses (through libgpm) in the same time. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin ___

Re: Retain orig. filename as suffix for tmp. filename

2003-02-23 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello, Adam! > It is worth noting, that the getlocalcopy has already supported file > 'extension' as a suffix (mclocalcopyX.tgz in our case, btw it was > implemented in a quite ugly way: 6 lines of code could be easily > substituted with simple strrchr), but it is not enough IMO: > > * Someth

Re: Retain orig. filename as suffix for tmp. filename

2003-02-23 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:39:44AM +0100, Adam Byrtek / alpha wrote: > +basename = strrchr (filename, PATH_SEP); > +if (basename && *basename==PATH_SEP) > + basename++; this is totally bogus. if (basename) basename++; else basename = filename; greetings -- Hi! I'm a .signature

Retain orig. filename as suffix for tmp. filename

2003-02-23 Thread Adam Byrtek / alpha
It is useful to have an original filename as a part of temporary filename when editing files from extfs or vfs: * editors can use it's features connected to file name/extension (syntax highlihting etc.) * user can see the real name of the file he is editing in external editor I've create

Re[2]: QNX 6.2 patch

2003-02-23 Thread Dmitry Alexeyev
Hello! Thank you! BTW, I have packaged mc-4.6.0 in QPR (QNX Package Installer files). Do you want me to send you a copy to put it on download site ? Also I have subbmitted this package to QSS's "QNX 3-rd Party Software CD", which ships with QNX Momentics 6.x. This CD contains public software with

Re: [PING] was Re: [PATCH] Dynamically load XOpenDisplay, XQueryPointer and XCloseDisplay (2nd try)

2003-02-23 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 12:29:10AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > Hello! > > > > I just looked at your patch, and it looks good, but it needs testing with > > > both glib-1.2 and glib-2.0, which would take some time. > > > > JFYI, I've tested the patch with both versions. On Cygwin, OpenBSD and > >