Hi Jindrich,
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 15:25, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> I can imagine the enhancement can be useful for XML/HTML/PHP, etc. but
> maybe it could be a configurable feature if considered to be committed
> at all.
I like that idea. An editor_match_bracket_open_str and
editor_match_bracket_cl
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:31 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi Jindrich,
>
> On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 11:45, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> > The question is whether highlighting of '<' and '>' is desirable in all
> > cases. Highlighting of such characters doesn't make too much sense when
> > editing
Hi Jindrich,
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 11:45, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> The question is whether highlighting of '<' and '>' is desirable in all
> cases. Highlighting of such characters doesn't make too much sense when
> editing C source files for instance.
I figured this patch is about the "Go to matchi
Hi Jindrich,
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 11:45, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> The question is whether highlighting of '<' and '>' is desirable in all
> cases.
Highlighting where? Is this in any way related to the syntax
highlighting?
> Highlighting of such characters doesn't make too much sense when
> editin
Hello Frantisek,
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 09:07 +0200, František Řezníček wrote:
> here are the changes (just unified diff) :
Please send the patch as an attachment for the next time, it makes
extraction of it less painful.
> # Should I use the latest nighbuild and incorporate the changes there or y
Hi Andrew,
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 04:31, Andrew V. Samoilov wrote:
> this patch should be applied to both branches.
Both branches? Didn't you notice we've had a release? Or are these
patches security related?
Leonard.
--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research
_
