On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 08:37:56 Egmont Koblinger wrote:
> I looked at the problem a while ago, and figured out that bash's speed
> improved quite a lot during versions, even though the latest is still not
> as fast as it should be, but much better than previous versions. I figured
> out that with bash
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 08:25:59 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 07:44:13 +1100 Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 04:09:45 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 11:43:35PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> > > > What do you think would be the best to do about it?
>
Hi guys,
I looked at the problem a while ago, and figured out that bash's speed
improved quite a lot during versions, even though the latest is still not
as fast as it should be, but much better than previous versions. I figured
out that with bash-4.2 the slowness it bearable and wasn't worth it
Hello,
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 07:44:13 +1100 Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 04:09:45 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 11:43:35PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> > > What do you think would be the best to do about it?
> >
> > find out where the slowness *actually* comes
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 04:09:45 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 11:43:35PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> > What do you think would be the best to do about it?
>
> find out where the slowness *actually* comes from. oprofile, or maybe
> callgrind (once you isolated the process).
I
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 11:43:35PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> What do you think would be the best to do about it?
>
find out where the slowness *actually* comes from. oprofile, or maybe
callgrind (once you isolated the process).
___
mc-devel mailing
Dear Oswald,
On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 21:26:04 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 11:34:58AM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> > For example if current working directory is /1/2/3/4/5 and we want to
> > change to /1/2/3/4/5/6 MC sends "cd /1/2/3/4/5/6" to bash when in
> > reality one would
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 11:34:58AM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> For example if current working directory is /1/2/3/4/5 and we want to
> change to /1/2/3/4/5/6 MC sends "cd /1/2/3/4/5/6" to bash when in
> reality one would likely to use "cd ./6" as long as it is just one hop
> away from current di
Dear MC team,
This is just an idea of improvement.
At the moment MC is quite ineffectively changing current working
directory (CWD) in subshell mode.
What's happening is MC sends full path of a directory we're we want to
change to the (bash) shell.
For example if current working directory is /1
