RE: MD: off topic- cool edit

2001-04-15 Thread Kenneth Lee
CE2000 support direct editing of MP3 files... and CE96 don't... so if you need this function.. it is a lot easier for you since you don't have to convert the files back and forth. Ken -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Timothy Stockman Sen

Re: MD: md-l-mimedigest V3 #9

2001-04-15 Thread me
Disks recorded on the x5 play well on the x5. likewise, disks recorded on the 702 play well on the x5 *AND* the 702. the only apparent problem is x5 -> 702 This is strange -- does the MD recorded on the x5 ALSO sound bad ON the x5? I ask beca

MD: off topic- cool edit

2001-04-15 Thread Timothy Stockman
I used CoolEdit 96 almost from the start and upgraded to CE2000 several months ago. Many things are almost the same, so there isn't much of a learning curve, so far as I can see. Like WinME, the user interface looks a bit slicker. It probably has lots of little changes, so whether it'd be wort

MD: What's missing on the MZ-R700 and MZ-R500? (was: Sony MZ-R900)

2001-04-15 Thread Eric Woudenberg, Minidisc.org Editor
Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The R500, R700 and R900 have different features. > > According to MDCP, the R700 doesn't have (when compared to the R900): > - - joint text > - - date/time stamp > - - LCD on remote > - - personal disc memory. > > On top of that, the R500 doesn't have: > - -

Re: MD: Light years (was Re: comparing sony mzr55 w/sharp 702/722)

2001-04-15 Thread Leon
=== = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please = = be more selective when quoting text = === In case you can't tell, that was a tongue stick

Re: MD: Light years (was Re: comparing sony mzr55 w/sharp 702/722)

2001-04-15 Thread Jeffrey Scorsone
=== = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please = = be more selective when quoting text = === Actually I think you sense the fact that on thi