[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> So.which one is better hehehe? :)
>
> Wallace
>
It depends.
BitStream or 1 bit D/A converters are cheaper to produce/implement than a 16-20
bits D/A converter of an equal quality. The thing is that I must yet see a 1 bit
high-end D/A converter!
Cheers,
Ralph
So.which one is better hehehe? :)
Wallace
- Original Message -
From: Colin Burchall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 1999 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: MD: 1bit, 16bit, 20bit..
>
> I should also add that "1 bit" does no
I should also add that "1 bit" does not refer to the resolution or bit width
of the convertor, and is a bit of a misnomer. The actual resolution of a 1
bit D-A is determined by the capacity of its counter and the frequency
multiple of the sampling rate that its clock runs at.
-cb
-
Eric Woudenberg wrote:
>If someone who knows this subject *cold* would like to write a crisp,
>concise, FAQ level answer about 16 bit vs. 1 bit conversion, I would
>be happy to include it in the MDCP FAQ. I will clean up the English if
>requested.
Conventional 16 bit convertors produce a 16 bit
=== The original message was multipart MIME===
=== All non-text parts (attachments) have been removed ===
Hello, i was wondering is 20 bit better than 16bit and 1bit?
most sharp's are using 20bit does this make it better recording then =
lets say a sony using a 16bit?
Aiwa is only
