* "Danny-K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 30 May 2001
| I am curious to learn exactly how sampling at twice the highest frequency
| changes things. I'm trying to visualize it, but I can't grasp it.
Are you familiar with the term "jaggies" in regards to images displays?
Jaggies are the stair-step
===
= NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please =
= be more selective when quoting text =
===
From: "Danny-K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > With du
> With due respect (and perhaps I'm misinterpreting what you say), this
> statement is completely false. Digital "achieves a wave" perfectly,
> provided you sample the wave at twice the highest frequency you're
> trying to capture. Flaws can be introduced in the conversion (A/D and
> D/A) steps,
Hi Danny,
"Danny-K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Let us not forget that digital is in essence trying to achieve a wave that
> it never can.
With due respect (and perhaps I'm misinterpreting what you say), this
statement is completely false. Digital "achieves a wave" perfectly,
provided you sa
