From: J. Coon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 1999 4:47 AM
Subject: Re: MD: It's that time again (the AHRA and copying)
> Maybe I missed something here. Isn't that what we have been talking
> about? Making recording
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* "J. Coon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 28 Dec 1999
| Maybe I missed something here. Isn't that what we have been talking
| about? Making recordings for our own use.
What started this was someone asking if it is legal to make recordings for
*anot
From: Eric Woudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 1999 3:58 AM
Subject: Re: MD: It's that time again (the AHRA and copying)
>
> "Magic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I beg to differ -
Jeffrey E. Salzberg wrote:
>
> > Yes, but the US copyright code has a clause in it particularly
> > exempting home recordists.
>
> Only those who are recording material for their own use.
Maybe I missed something here. Isn't that what we have been talking
about? Making recordings for our own
> Yes, but the US copyright code has a clause in it particularly
> exempting home recordists.
Only those who are recording material for their own use.
=
Jeffrey E. Salzberg, Lighting Designer
http://www.cloud9.net/~salzberg
==
On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 15:33:56 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I tried to explain why the below was so (having a formal law
> school education on the subject and having practiced copyright law to
> a limited extent) and how it came to pass, and found myself the
> subject of scurrilous attac
> > OK, it says that you may transfer devices and media; now quote the
> > part where it says you may transfer *content*.
>
> ".for making digital musical recordings or analog musical
> recordings."
>
> > Hint: you can't.
>
> I beg to differ - what is a musical recording if it isn't conten
- Original Message -
From: Jeffrey E. Salzberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Seth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 27, 1999 3:34 AM
Subject: Re: MD: It's that time again (the AHRA and copying)
>
> > "No action may
My God, someone else knows what they are talking about.
I feel almost giddy. I love the e-mail address. I might try setting
up a new separate e-mail for MD-L only so I can speak the truth
without people on the list harassing me through personal e-mail.
In the U.S., the IRS has decided that in-kind trades of services are
taxable income (you fix my car, I'll chop down your tree), and the IRS
has won on that point. This would favor Jeff's point to some degree
-- if in-kind trades are a form of income, they are commercial
activity. It is absolute
> So
> piracy, and its commercial impact, have nothing to do with home
> recording, or home recorders.
. . .And copyrights aren't meant solely to protect against
large-scale pirates.
=
Jeffrey E. Salzberg, Lighting Designer
http://www.cloud9.net/~salz
Here is an interesting statement.
http://www.hrrc.org/gklein_statement.html
FOr the web impared, let me quote part of it. (Note this com e under
the fair use principle) Home Recording Should Not
Be Confused With Commercial Piracy
The fears that have been expressed over giving consumers the a
Seth,
Couple of questions:
>Note, that from the previous sections of the AHRA
>which you can look up yourself, only home recording
>equiptment that contains SCMS and analog devices that
>comply with the law are covered by the previous quote
>(this excludes MP3's and computer CD-R drives).
Does
Seth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have any of you bothered to read the American
>Home Recording Act of 1976 and it's 1992 Ammendment
>before showing the list your ignorance regarding the
>issue? Judging from most of your posts it would seem
>to me that you haven't only not read it, but you
> The law is simple and straight to the point.
> It is neither illegal or unethical to copy CD's to MD
> or nearly and other derivation involving copying or
> recording.
For *personal* use. The minute you transfer that copy to someone
else, it's no longer personal.
> There simply is no ethi
> "No action may be brought under this title alleging
> infringement of copyright based on the manufacture,
> importation, or distribution of a digital audio
> recording device, a digital audio recording medium, an
> analog recording device, or an analog recording
> medium, or based on the noncom
- Original Message -
From: Seth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 27, 1999 5:56 AM
Subject: MD: It's that time again (the AHRA and copying)
> Have any of you bothered to read the American
> Home Recording Act of 1976 and it&#
Hey list,
I haven't posted in a long time, but some of you
who go way back will remember me and the many flame
wars I got into over this issue and others. I think
it's time someone cleared the air here. It seems that
every so often we have to go down this road of
"Illegal Copying" and poi
18 matches
Mail list logo
