Re: MD: MD vs. DAT

2001-05-27 Thread las
Stainless Steel Rat wrote: > What purpose will this serve? None at all. We allready know that the > waveforms will be slightly different because the algorithms and reduction > rate are different. But if your ears cannot tell the difference -- which > is the entire point of Sony's continuing i

Re: MD: MD vs. DAT

2001-05-27 Thread Stainless Steel Rat
* Stainless Steel Rat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 27 May 2001 | What purpose will this serve? None at all. We allready know that the already | waveforms will be slightly different because the algorithms and reduction | rate are different. But

Re: MD: MD vs. DAT

2001-05-27 Thread Stainless Steel Rat
* Mike Hooker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 26 May 2001 | i would like for anyone interested to grab these files from me and give | them a listen. those really in the know can do spectrum analysis and what | ever else is available to do this kind of comparison besides the ears. What purpose w

MD: MD vs. DAT

2001-05-26 Thread Mike Hooker
hi, i was recently given a free sony DAT deck . i thought being that i now have a deck, i may as well have a DAT portable , so i bought a used sony 7( in perfect working order, just serviced.). i set up my mics in my basement, along with my soundprofesionals premium binaural mics and bass r

MD: md vs. dat

1999-07-28 Thread assemblage
Hey All, I'm new to the list and wnat to know if any of you have used md decks in a da computer studio set up, in place of dat decks, and if so what do you reccomend, do I need spdif, how about the sony mds-e11, or similar, I understand the sound quality is comparable or better. H. Elmer NYC