Re: MD: MP3's vs MD.

2001-02-06 Thread Robert J Lynn Jr
ght just topple MP3. - Original Message - From: "Dave Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 1:48 PM Subject: Re: MD: MP3's vs MD. > > [snip] > > Looking from a purely technical standpoint, ATRAC > &

Re: MD: MP3's vs MD.

2001-02-06 Thread Dave Hooper
[snip] > Looking from a purely technical standpoint, ATRAC > beats MP3. ATRAC is fully reverse and forward compatible, and is constantly > updated with new revisions. MP3 has been the same since the MPEG1 Audio > standard was made back in the late '80s. > -- > Robert J. Lynn, Jr. > Brainbench Cer

Re: MD: MP3's vs MD.

2001-02-05 Thread Robert J Lynn Jr
ginal Message - From: "Ivica Petrovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 4:42 PM Subject: Re: MD: MP3's vs MD. > > Donald Person wrote > > >This is another reason I don't understand why a

Re: MD: MP3's vs MD.

2001-02-05 Thread Ivica Petrovic
Donald Person wrote >This is another reason I don't understand why all these portable MP3 >devices are so popular. People are misers? wow, a bunch of music for a cost of nothing! and the quality is equal. - To stop getting this li

Re: MD: MP3's vs MD.

2001-02-05 Thread Donald Person
>...I have noted with some interest that several list members apparently >record mp3 files from their computers onto minidisc. Apparently, from what >I've read here and on the several webboards devoted to minidisc, this is a >rather common practice. In light of this, how do you all feel about the