Re: MD: OT: Re: LAME/BladeEnc

1999-12-17 Thread Matt Wall
28(minimum) for anything worth listening to :) Later Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Peter Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 1:46 PM Subject: Re: MD: OT: Re: LAME/BladeEnc > >Hya All, &g

Re: MD: OT: Re: LAME/BladeEnc

1999-12-15 Thread Peter Wood
Hya All, Not wishing to take this OT threed any further but... ;) Besides from the encoder what else makes the best output... ie settings. Obvious the higher the bit rate the better, using a HQ option if the encoder has one... my main question is the stereo... There are two option that I can fi

MD: OT: Re: LAME/BladeEnc

1999-12-12 Thread Jason K. Fritcher
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > After Jake told me about LAME, I went and downloaded and compared it to > L3enc and BladeEnc... I must say, I am amazed at the difference between it > and Blade -- it's like going from 80 kbps MP3 to a MD. :) In case anyone hasn't looked, either the